I would like to know more before completley comdeming globalization as evil. I know Ron Paul supporters dont like merging and they keep making reference to the European Union. However not only is the EU extremely successful (so far) but I thought it was only an economic agreement to use the same currency am I wrong in that assumption? Dont the countries of europe keep their individual governments and so on, their identities? They just make an economic decision that would mutually benifit everyone involved. Now im not supporting it cause i obviously dont know enough about it, im just saying if done correctly or in a limited fashion couldnt it help our increasingly shity dollar?

Well, the reason for the US Dollar losing it's value is a separate issue, altogether, and we don't need a North American Union to increase its value. That aside, this debate really comes down to whether you'd prefer to remain a sovereign nation or not. The borders between Canada, the US and Mexico will effectively disappear if there's a NAU, because the NAU goes much further than just currency and trade. The purpose of our Declaration of Independence was to claim our Union of States' independence. The NAU will render that document obsolete, and shortly thereafter the Constitution would be obsolete, because it cannot exist without our DoI. This isn't something to shrug at, because the changes won't come hard and fast, and most likely the general population would never notice their liberties and freedoms being taken away.

If you'd prefer the notion of a one world government (the true end to the globilization means), then you should be for the NAU, because that is step number two. Step number one was the EU, and next will be the Asian Union, then the African Union. Eventually, all of the "Unions" will probably become a one world union. And, if you still think all the nations that used to be sovereign would retain their "current governments" or "identities", as you put it, then I don't know what else I can say to you other than support globalization because, boy oh boy, does it sound nifty.

Take a little time to research the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America (SPP), the World Trade Organization (WTO), the North American Free Trade Agreement, (NAFTA), and the Central American Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA). While you're at it, research the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) and see how many of the current candidates are part of the CFR. If, after all of that, you still don't see how globalization is a bad idea for our sovereign nation, then, well support globalization. Support a one world government. A one world police force. Oh, what a happier utopia this world will be.

I have to say...this is a classic case of "in a perfect world" if the world leaders were men of principle and conscience who were really dedicated to the wellbeing of the people under their charge then these types of unions would indeed be a nifty idea. hell, in that case a one world government wouldn't be a bad thing but rather a huge step in the right direction for the human race. This sadly, is not the case though.

As long as those who govern us continue to be (commonly) bad people with only their own interests in mind then these unions and eventual NWO type setup only serves to cement them and their ilk into place as the masters of humanity. Malevolent gods rather than the benevolent leaders that could make the Human race take that next step.

Visit this Canadian GOVERNMENT website to view pictures of the NAFTA SUPERHIGHWAY

http://www.infratrans.gov.ab.ca/INFTRA_Content/docType56/Production/pol306.htm