Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Already signed up?
Log in now.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Remember your password?
Log in now.
5 Comments
NordlichReitersays...http://english.pravda.ru/news/world/09-12-2009/111008-Copenhagen%20-0
Danish secret? Any one know more about this? I saw it on CNN first.
MilkmanDansays...Although I'm a skeptic myself, I think this was the most even-handed and honest examination of "climate gate" that I've seen (first half of video).
It doesn't change my mind that we don't understand the system of climate well enough to decide that we need to regulate CO2 emissions to "stave off disaster". I think there are better ways to fight / control pollution in general, and I think that we need a more complete understanding of climate before we attempt to correct or prevent any aspect of it.
brainsays...This guy succeeds where every news channel fails. *quality
siftbotsays...Boosting this quality contribution up in the Hot Listing - declared quality by brain.
NordlichReitersays...When it pertains to the work you do nothing is private. If it can be used against you later, do not say it. Do not write it. Do not whisper it. Do not talk about it with people who may gain from your folly.
If I went and did some Load Testing on a website, and then talked with a co-worker about it; we decided to add some calumny into our banter about website owners then that would be unethical.
But what do I know, ethical hackers, and open source developers don't know shit about anything.
The only way to know if an encryption is safe is to let the public have it. IE: PGP
Always keep your private feelings out of work. Its unethical and unprofessional.
Alas, none of the above has to do with the validity of the science, just the lack of professionalism by the scientists involved.
Discuss...
Enable JavaScript to submit a comment.