So wait, you provided a link to the video you duped but you still posted it?

Two different vids, clearly. If he were to post like a billion snippets or whatever, that's one thing, but I see nothing wrong with a long vid and one concise good point out of it that stands well on its own.

>> ^JAPR:

Two different vids, clearly. If he were to post like a billion snippets or whatever, that's one thing, but I see nothing wrong with a long vid and one concise good point out of it that stands well on its own.


Then initiate a poll to have the rules changed.

*dupeof=http://videosift.com/video/Bertrand-Russell-BBC-1959-Interview

This video has been nominated as a duplicate of this video by xxovercastxx. If this nomination is seconded with *isdupe, the video will be killed and its votes transferred to the original.

This video focuses on answering one specific question. While the other is a thirty minute interview. I don't think this constitutes a dupe.

If I may offer, this video is not a dupeof.

The alleged offended video cited is Part 1 of a three part video series of an interview.

The alleged dupe, in fact, comprises the final less than two minutes of Part 3 of the series.

Hence,...not a dupeof.