Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Check your email for a verification code and enter it below.Don't close this box or you must fill out this form again.
Already signed up?
Log in now.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Remember your password?
Log in now.
jonny
(Member Profile)
You had already "dupeofed" it. I could have "isduped" it, but killed it without thinking.
Also, curious: how did you find my comment an another user's profile about yet another user's video? I can't imagine you browse everyone's profile pages. Is there some kind of linkbank thing you followed?
In reply to this comment by jonny:
I think you can use "dupeof" on your own videos at any time, even if it's killed. Worth a shot anyway.
In reply to this comment by messenger:
Hey, I just accdientally killed my dupe Apache crash video before the votes could be transferred to the original one posted by marinara.
You wanna go upvote his?
http://videosift.com/video/AH-64-Apache-helicopter-crash-in-Sha
rana-Afghanistan
Thanks!
Phreezdryd
(Member Profile)
Hey, I just accdientally killed my dupe Apache crash video before the votes could be transferred to the original one posted by marinara.
You wanna go upvote his?
http://videosift.com/video/AH-64-Apache-helicopter-crash-in-Sharana-Afghanistan
Thanks!
intangiblemeg
(Member Profile)
Hey intangiblemeg,
I've got a question about correctly assigning something to the femme channel. Would you say it's for any sift that prominently features a woman for any reason, or should the content itself address a woman-related topic? IMO a channel about women would be more useful than a channel merely containing women, like every Rachel Maddow or Ana Kasparian video. Case in point: this video features a woman, but it's got zero to do with women as a topic.
Thanks!
jonny
(Member Profile)
Thanks!
In reply to this comment by jonny:
*promote
FlowersInHisHair
(Member Profile)
Yes. I was trying to reinterpret the "God-hates-fags-so-he-gave-them-AIDS" line with something just as scientifically rigorous in light of the new evidence, and which stays well within religious wingnut logic.
In reply to this comment by FlowersInHisHair:
>> ^messenger:
Can you see now, homophobes? God didn't create HIV because he "hates fags". Rather, these people are God's chosen ones to finally deliver the cure for cancer. Suck on that, haters!
You know gay people didn't invent HIV, right?
ghark
(Member Profile)
Thanks. Fixed.
In reply to this comment by ghark:
private video