search results matching tag: wild things
» channel: weather
go advanced with your query
Search took 0.002 seconds
Videos (31) | Sift Talk (3) | Blogs (2) | Comments (50) |
Videos (31) | Sift Talk (3) | Blogs (2) | Comments (50) |
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Already signed up?
Log in now.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Remember your password?
Log in now.
NSFW, Nudity, and the Sift: Pushing and then defining the boundaries (Sift Talk Post)
My comment from the thread:
It's not about the pot and the kettle, it's about artistic merit. The Fast Times clip is famous (or maybe, as you like to put it, infamous), and as dag said, is actually making a joke about gratuitous nudity.
Your clip, on the other hand, works on pretty much one level, and that's why it was appropriately downvoted - not for the nudity, but for the content. I'm sorry if your feelings are hurt, but Fast Times at Ridgemont High and Wild Things 3 just ain't the same thing. Ain't even in the same ballpark.
You're probably the only person on the Sift who's seen Wild Things 3, and even then maybe only this clip. There just isn't anything more to offer here other than lesbian nudity - which I am TOTALLY not against, but there are clearly other places on the internets where you can find that sort of thing, and plenty more explicit.
So I hear.
All that said, sex may sell, bnsa - but I like to think the standards at VS are just a tad higher than a million other stroke sites where you can watch hot lesbian action free or relatively free of charge. And by the way, my Fast Times clip is certainly not the first one to contain nudity and get a lot of upvotes:
http://www.videosift.com/story.php?id=18509
Wild Things 3: Diamonds in the Rough (Infamous Scene)
It's not about the pot and the kettle, it's about artistic merit. The Fast Times clip is famous (or maybe, as you like to put it, infamous), and as dag said, is actually making a joke about gratuitous nudity.
Your clip, on the other hand, works on pretty much one level, and that's why it was appropriately downvoted - not for the nudity, but for the content. I'm sorry if your feelings are hurt, but Fast Times at Ridgemont High and Wild Things 3 just ain't the same thing. Ain't even in the same ballpark.
You're probably the only person on the Sift who's seen Wild Things 3, and even then maybe only this clip. There just isn't anything more to offer here other than lesbian nudity - which I am TOTALLY not against, but there are clearly other places on the internets where you can find that sort of thing, and plenty more explicit.
So I hear.
NSFW, Nudity, and the Sift: Pushing and then defining the boundaries (Sift Talk Post)
I'm all for T&A, nudity, lesbians making out, and porn (Woo Hoo!) However, I stood up because I'm noticing that the content on VS is pushing the boundries every day, and while we can down vote all day long, most people will upvote T&A, Nudity, lesbians making out and Porn... why? Because SEX SELLS. Its been with us since the dawn of time and will continue to be with us. Few people object anymore and I was surprised no one (see comment section) objected to the original video that showed frontal nudity, which supports my point. My Wild Things video was to prove a point and ask the question: ok where does VS draw the line? I guess now we know a little better. I hated to have to speak up but I shouldn't have to (especially since I'm all for it - BUT NOT HERE). I guess I care too much about VS to see it become just another regular site.
Siftquistion!!! VIVA LA RESISTANCE!
LOL! :-P ~
Wild Things 3: Diamonds in the Rough (Infamous Scene)
Uh...Wild Things 3?
Something can't be "infamous" if it was never famous to begin with.
Let's try not to turn VS into a smut-fest, mmkay?
Ivan Maximov - Fru 89 From left to right
Excellent. This reminds me of those old 70's cartoons that gave you that funny feeling in your chest...like "Where the Wild Things Are."