search results matching tag: v8

» channel: weather

go advanced with your query
Search took 0.000 seconds

    Videos (72)     Sift Talk (1)     Blogs (7)     Comments (92)   

Red Bull F1 vs V8 Supercar vs C63 AMG (Melbourne, 2014)

Mercedes AMG vs V8 Supercar vs F1 car - Speed Comparison

Red Bull F1 vs V8 Supercar vs C63 AMG (Melbourne, 2014)

Red Bull F1 vs V8 Supercar vs C63 AMG (Melbourne, 2014)

The difference new engines make in Formula 1

TheGenk says...

from http://www.formula1.com/news/features/2014/1/15408.html:
Rule change: Introduction of new power unit consisting of a 1.6-litre V6 turbo engine and two Energy Recovery Systems (ERS)
Implications: The 2.4-litre normally-aspirated V8 engines of 2013 produced around 750bhp, with an additional 80bhp available for around six seconds per lap from KERS. The 2014 V6s put out around 600bhp. However, the two ERS systems (ERS-K and ERS-H) will give drivers an additional 160bhp or so for approximately 33 seconds per lap.

Transforming Formula One: 2014 Rules Explained by Red Bull

oritteropo says...

Yes. The naturally aspirated v8 engines were increasingly irrelevant for road car technology, so the aims of the new engine rules were to introduce the types of technology that are relevant to road cars (turbo, regenerative braking, fuel efficiency).

Two less-intended side effects are that these are the most expensive engines ever (in an era when everybody is talking about cost reductions!) and that everyone is wondering whether anyone will finish the first race...

They actually had the battery packs last year, but this year have reduced the fuel allocation by a third but without reducing the power output of the power units.

*related=http://videosift.com/video/Inside-the-2014-Renault-F1-engine

notarobot said:

Cool *animation. Can anyone explain why they need such big battery packs and use regenerative breaking? Are they driving hybrids or something?

Container ship OOCL Belgium taking 40 degree roll

End of an era: signing off final Mercedes-Benz V8 F1 engine

oritteropo says...

The team have posted an extended version of the interview with Andy Cowell, where he says a few interesting things including that the current engine makes more than 750bhp, compared to about 200 odd for a similar capacity road car engine, and that the main focus of the new regulation engine is conversion efficiency which really wasn't a big consideration for the current v8 specification when they were designed.


First audio clip of Renault 2014 F1 engine

End of an era: signing off final Mercedes-Benz V8 F1 engine

Obama Tries to Fix the Shutdown Government with Apple

oritteropo (Member Profile)

lurgee says...

Hey brother! Lately I have been listening to a new podcast subscription that I thought that you would enjoy. Car Stuff. So far I have listened to The Karmann Ghia, V8 Supercar Series, Tesla Motors, Group B Rally Cars and The Carroll Shelby Story. *quality stuffs

Tech Bites: Fuel Slosh CFD Simulation

A Day in India

A bit of snow is not going to stop the mighty Audi

conan says...

No. Let me help:

1) Not 2012 but 1994-1997.
2) There's no "AWD" with Audi, it's simply "Quattro".
3) It's not an A4, it's based on an A6. The first one by the way, successor to Audi's "100" series.
4) It's not a 2.0T, it's a naturally aspirated V8.
5) Above is also the reason why i wrote "based on an A6" because it's an S6 to be precise. The little badge on the trunk is a giveaway.

chingalera said:

would that be the 2012 AWD Audi A4 2.0T Avant Quattro???

http://www.autobytel.com/best-cars/awd/wagons/2012/best-2012-awd-station-wagons-113315/2/

Bad Ass, I'm sold.



Send this Article to a Friend



Separate multiple emails with a comma (,); limit 5 recipients






Your email has been sent successfully!

Manage this Video in Your Playlists

Top New Weather Videos by Vote