that one baby stole all the hair...looks like he's wearing a cheap toupee

that toupee is denying his hairline

Just found this on the internet...

If he runs and wins the nomination, there will be Hell toupee!

it was like even the hairs on the back of his toupee was standing up.. yup. I went there...

What a colossal wanker. The entire time during the dinner he was sitting there brooding and looking like a goddamn child. Why did he even turn up? He's an absurd, narcissistic, toupee-bearing mental case.

This needs "Trump" and "toupee" tags.

HAHAHA!!! "Mobius toupee" completely made me snort milk.

/I'm now prefer to calling Donal Tru...Mobius Toupee!!!
//"Race Card" (1 Black Mana) cast: FATALITY! YOU WIN, FLAWLESS!
///I had to say it!

Sigh... what really suffers from this stupid stupid ruling is the cases of real rape where sexual intercourse is forced on another person (male or female). This devalues the real crime.

"If a woman or a man feel they were given wrong information, then it is rape."

No. Just no... It is lying, it is deceit, it isn't rape.

Edit: here's a good example to put this in perspective. On internet dating sites people lie about their height, weight, income, amount of hair they have.

If a woman sleeps with a man wearing a toupee and after the fact finds out the hair was fake, is that rape? According to this mindless cunt and the racist people she represents, yes. Fuck her and every idiot that thinks like her.

Liberal Lies About National Healthcare: Fourth in a Series
Ann Coulter
Wednesday, September 09, 2009

(12) Only national health care can provide "coverage that will stay with you whether you move, change your job or lose your job" -- as Obama said in a New York Times op-ed.

This is obviously a matter of great importance to all Americans, because, with Obama's economic policies, none of us may have jobs by year's end.

The only reason you can't keep -- or often obtain -- health insurance if you move or lose your job now is because of ... government intrusion into the free market.

You will notice that if you move or lose your job, you can obtain car and home insurance, hairdressers, baby sitters, dog walkers, computer technicians, cars, houses, food and every other product and service not heavily regulated by the government. (Although it does become a bit harder to obtain free office supplies.)

Federal tax incentives have created a world in which the vast majority of people get health insurance through their employers. Then to really screw ordinary Americans, the tax code actually punishes people who don't get their health insurance through an employer by denying individuals the tax deduction for health insurance that their employers get.

Meanwhile, state governments must approve the insurers allowed to operate in their states, while mandating a list of services -- i.e. every "medical" service with a powerful lobby -- which is why Joe and Ruth Zelinsky, both 88, of Paterson, N.J., are both covered in case either one of them ever needs a boob job.

If Democrats really wanted people to be able to purchase health insurance when they move or lose a job as easily as they purchase car insurance and home insurance (or haircuts, dog walkers, cars, food, computers), they could do it in a one-page bill lifting the government controls and allowing interstate commerce in health insurance. This is known as "allowing the free market to operate."

Plus, think of all the paper a one-page bill would save! Don't Democrats care about saving the planet anymore? Go green!

(13) The "public option" trigger is something other than a national takeover of health care.

Why does the government get to decide when the "trigger" has been met, allowing it to do something terrible to us? Either the government is better at providing goods and services or the free market is -- and I believe the historical record is clear on that. Why do liberals get to avoid having that argument simply by invoking "triggers"?

Why not have a "trigger" allowing people to buy medical insurance on the free market when a trigger is met, such as consumers deciding their health insurance is too expensive? Or how about a trigger allowing us to buy health insurance from Utah-based insurers -- but only when triggered by our own states requiring all insurance companies to cover marriage counseling, drug rehab and shrinks?

Thinking more broadly, how about triggers for paying taxes? Under my "public option" plan, citizens would not have to pay taxes until a trigger kicks in. For example, 95 percent of the Department of Education's output is useful, or -- in the spirit of compromise -- at least not actively pernicious.

Also, I think we need triggers for taking over our neighbors' houses. If they don't keep up 95 percent of their lawn -- on the basis of our lawn commission's calculations -- we get to move in. As with Obama's public option trigger, we (in the role of "government") pay nothing. All expenses with the house would continue to be paid by the neighbor (playing "taxpayer").

To make our housing "public option" even more analogous to Obama's health care "public option," we'll have surly government employees bossing around the neighbors after we evict them and a Web site for people to report any negative comments the neighbors make about us.

Another great trigger idea: We get to pull Keith Olbermann's hair to see if it's a toupee -- but only when triggered by his laughably claiming to have gone to an Ivy League university, rather than the bovine management school he actually attended.

(14) National health care will not cover abortions or illegal immigrants.

This appeared in an earlier installment of "Liberal Lies About Health Care," but I keep seeing Democrats like Howard Dean and Rep. Jan Schakowsky on TV angrily shouting that these are despicable lies -- which, in itself, constitutes proof that it's all true.

Then why did Democrats vote down amendments that would prohibit coverage for illegals and abortion? (Also, why is Planned Parenthood collecting petition signatures in Manhattan -- where they think they have no reason to be sneaky -- in support of national health care?)

On July 30 of this year, a House committee voted against a Republican amendment offered by Rep. Nathan Deal that would have required health care providers to use the Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements (SAVE) Program to prevent illegal aliens from receiving government health care services. All Republicans and five Democrats voted for it, but 29 Democrats voted against it, killing the amendment.

On the same day, the committee voted 30-29 against an amendment offered by Republican Joe Pitts explicitly stating that government health care would not cover abortions. Zealous abortion supporter Henry Waxman -- a walking, breathing argument for abortion if ever there was one -- originally voted in favor of the Pitts amendment because that allowed him, in a sleazy parliamentary trick, to bring the amendment up for reconsideration later. Which he did -- as soon as he had enough Democrats in the hearing room to safely reject it.

If any liberal sincerely believes that national health care will not cover illegals and abortion, how do they explain the Democrats frantically opposing amendments that would make this explicit?

SOMEONE SAYS "IS THIS OKAY" YOU SAY?
Birds Fly

WHAT WOULD BEST DESCRIBE YOUR PERSONALITY?
Father

WHAT DO YOU LIKE IN A GUY/GIRL?
9 Shake Break Bounce

HOW DO YOU FEEL TODAY?
El Wraith

WHAT IS YOUR LIFE'S PURPOSE?
Andantino

WHAT IS YOUR MOTTO?
Possibly Maybe

WHAT DO YOUR FRIENDS THINK OF YOU?
Flim

WHAT DO YOU THINK OF YOUR PARENTS?
Quite Inside

WHAT DO YOU THINK ABOUT VERY OFTEN?
Guinnea Pig 3

WHAT IS 2+2?
BWV 540

WHAT DO YOU THINK OF YOUR BEST FRIEND?
Powaqqatsi

WHAT DO YOU THINK OF THE PERSON YOU LIKE?
Autumn In New York

WHAT IS YOUR LIFE STORY?
Lesson I for Good Friday

WHAT DO YOU WANT TO BE WHEN YOU GROW UP?
Resurrection

WHAT DO YOU THINK WHEN YOU SEE THE PERSON YOU LIKE?
Truck Driver Divorce

WHAT DO YOUR PARENTS THINK OF YOU?
Serra Pelada

WHAT WILL YOU DANCE TO AT YOUR WEDDING?
Rock This Town

WHAT WILL THEY PLAY AT YOUR FUNERAL?
Boo Who?

WHAT IS YOUR HOBBY/INTEREST?
Pearly

WHAT DO YOU THINK OF YOUR FRIENDS?
Anstromm Feck-4

WHATS THE WORST THING THAT COULD HAPPEN?
I'm Out Deah

HOW WILL YOU DIE?
Magnetic Rag

WHAT IS THE ONE THING YOU REGRET?
O choruscans stellarum

WHAT MAKES YOU LAUGH?
Naught More Terrific Than Man

WHAT MAKES YOU CRY?
Extraordinary Machine

WILL YOU EVER GET MARRIED?
Bleeding Heart

WHAT SCARES YOU THE MOST?
The Ozone

DOES ANYONE LIKE YOU?
Cocaine And Toupees

IF YOU COULD GO BACK IN TIME, WHAT WOULD YOU CHANGE?
Jill's America

WHAT HURTS RIGHT NOW?
Versuchung Des Heiligen Antonius

He used to wear a toupee until he was put in jail where they wouldn't let him have it and so he had to show up in court (and on TV) without his rug. I don't think he has worn it ever since that illusion was shattered.

This guys comb-over toupee-like crop....That gnarled brow...Yarrrgh...
Veto, baby...Drop that dollar n' pick up rupees, ladies and gentlemen...

Captain Kirk was a young muscle bound dude. Captain Kirk DOES NOT have a perm or toupee. Captain Kirk DOES NOT have a gut. Thanks to JJ for not bringing him back in any way! I would fully support the rendering of the original cast into new movies. (Even if they were only as realistic as Shrek.)

He's going to rob the pizza store, but you can't make him do it with dignity.

LOL at the toupee and sunglasses.

Glad to see this guy got exactly what he ordered.

See, anyone can do a video like this. It's easy.

"Married 13 times. Made a fortune, then lost it all, then made another fortune. Kept the toupee industry alive single-handedly. Patented the words 'You're Fired'."

Donald Trump