If a woman has an illegal abortion the father should also suffer the same exact penalty whatever it is. Even if he has to pay for half the gas to travel out of state and half of the abortion costs and the full cost of flowers at the end. Dinner is optional.

It takes two to tango and two to untango. The body inside the womb is only half hers.

Why do you make this a woman thing when a man thing was involved? That sure is pretty convenient for you I would imagine. Takes two to tango.

RIP Ned.

Since it takes two to tango, RIP William McKinney who died in December 1, 2011 (aged 80)

Dude....when you just got harassed like that for a minor infraction, don't drive away while filming yourself, which is a serious dangerous crime akin to driving drunk.

I was stopped as a mohawked teenager in Palo Alto for being "suspicious" by taking two minutes to drop my girlfriend off at her house, and ten minutes later across town I was surrounded by 11-12 cop cars, lights on, and 18+- police who detained me for 45 minutes but had nothing to charge me with. Compared to that, this seemed benign (don't get me wrong, I see this as a blatant racist action, the message being "you don't belong here, boy", but I expected much worse).

There's always a chance, what there isn't is any evidence it's ever been a problem (except 2018 which had huge problems with Republicans trying to cheat, but they were caught), including in the multiple states that have been universally voting by mail for multiple elections. It's never been a question before Trump. Now it's only questionable because of Trump's incompetence, interference, and lies.
Yesterday he said if he loses, there's cheating, if he wins, there isn't. I'm certain you are so gone you agree with that and don't see any problems with that mindset.

Don't forget Trump's multi million dollar investigation into fraudulent votes in 2016 when he claims 3 million illegal immigrants voted found.....wait for it.......FUCKING NOTHING. The only voter fraud in decades has been by Republicans. You still never offered a single one of the "known instances of Democrats cheating", but you tried at least 3 times failing miserably every time and only coming up with Trump's plan to suppress and deny the votes of tens of millions of citizens, cheating them out of their vote to stop this lie of non existent, not found when investigated, rampant illegal voting. Nothing else, certainly not a single democrat cheating.

Voter ID is a poll tax. If Republicans had paid for the ID they wanted everyone to have, and forced everyone to get their voter only ID in person, so rich people weren't exempt from this extra day spent at the dmv and fee requirement to vote, it wouldn't be a consideration because the point isn't to stop in person voter fraud which isn't a problem, it's to stop people who can't afford to pay $25 and take two days off work to vote from voting.

It's the same reason Republicans refuse to consider making election day a holiday so everyone could vote...more voters mean fewer Republicans elected.

Take two
*1stTube *latenight

Why not take two steps in the right direction?

Taking the texting while drunk driving analogy - you'd ban both wouldn't you?. To simply ban the texting is surely tacit approval of the DUI.

I understand the sort of pragmatic approach and I'm not even sure I'd be against it... I just think you have to be careful not to imagine it as a step in the right direction because, frankly, it's not a step at all. To me it is closer to addressing a loophole in the preexisting law and it doesn't really facilitate or encourage further gun regulation. If banning bumpstocks is your end goal then great, but if you want more then I think you need to be asking for more, even (or perhaps especially?) if it means fighting for it.

Holy Fuck!! Google "Trump Bonwit Teller":

https://www.fastcodesign.com/90137202/hey-remember-when-trump-destroyed-precious-art-history

New York Times:
"Plain as the building might be, the entrance was like a spilled casket of gems: platinum, bronze, hammered aluminum, orange and yellow faience, and tinted glass backlighted at night. In 1929 American Architect magazine called it “a sparkling jewel in keeping with the character of the store.”


"Upon learning about the historic building’s imminent demolition, and recognizing the cultural value of its ornamentation, the Metropolitan Museum of Art convinced Trump to remove portions of the historic facade and donate them to the institution."

"Soon he was backpedaling, after realizing that it would take two more weeks and $32,000...to properly take the reliefs off the building. Using his fake alter ago, a “Trump spokesperson” named John Baron, he told the New York Times in 1980: “The merit of these stones was not great enough to justify the efforts to save them.” His construction workers chopped up the metalwork with torches and let the sculptures fall to the ground to crack into smithereens."

Two, 15 foot high, irreplacable, Art Deco bas-relief sculptures smashed by Trump to save $32,000 in costs to remove them.

Sheesh, I am pretty political I suppose - but listening to the idiot underlings that are a part of any campaign drive for either the republictards or the democraps is almost as terrible as going to fucking church.

I don't see it as much a reflection of Hillary (even though she is a scumfuck too) but a reflection of her campaign underlings hiring inexperienced workers with a tad of blab blab blab, blah blah blah and a ton of ignorance. But to me, this is a stone cold reflection of America as it really is. Look in the mirror America, now take two hits wait ten minutes and look long and hard once more. Like, like, like, like, like, like *BLAM*!!!!

Only $54.00!!! I'll take two! Suck it cancer.

An engineering school really is a special case. Though I do think more humanities classes would be better, it isn't really possible to fit them into a typical engineering curriculum. As I recall from my school days, you needed 15 humanities credits over the four years to graduate. The typical overall class load was between 16 and 19 credits per trimester. And even with all that engineering education, you're usually still not ready to just immediately start performing at some job. You'll need a year or two of work experience before you're a fully productive engineer.

You just couldn't get a well rounded liberal arts education and a solid engineering education in four years. In fact, on average, it takes someone five years to get a bachelors in engineering.

I'm not really sure what the solution is. Even though I can accept the utility of it, I'm not sure I like the idea of the earlier educational specialization of some European models.

My advice to someone graduating from high school in the US is take two or three years off first, get any random crap job, and get some experience of life before you commit to a serious education.

THAT'S INSANE!!....i'll take two.

I'll take TWO! *doublepromote

No you are wrong. It's not the first time you haven't understood how things work around here when it comes to videos. Your comments make it quite apparent you dont get the mechanics of the sift. Videos DO NOT disappear with a downvote. The sift is not built for the possibility for that to happen. It takes two days for a video to leave the unsifted area and be put into your pq. But go ahead keep digging your heals in.

and saying a downvote equals suppression on the sift shows your knowledge of how things work here.

-edit-
Also your siftalk posts over the last year makes it very clear of your lack of understanding of sift video mechanics.

*related=http://videosift.com/video/Billy-Joel-and-Jimmy-Fallon-Form-2-Man-Doo-Wop-Group
*related=http://videosift.com/video/Will-Smith-Jimmy-Fallon-Beatbox-It-Takes-Two-Using-iPad