search results matching tag: rack

» channel: weather

go advanced with your query
Search took 0.001 seconds

    Videos (99)     Sift Talk (9)     Blogs (6)     Comments (432)   

C-note (Member Profile)

siftbot says...

Your video, Nice Rack, has made it into the Top 15 New Videos listing. Congratulations on your achievement. For your contribution you have been awarded 1 Power Point.

This achievement has earned you your "Pop Star" Level 25 Badge!

HowToBasic - How To Make Ramen

Ashenkase says...

This is a very basic recipe, I would suggest however that his might be an even easier procedure:

https://imgur.com/a/6wwB2w5#mangR8C

If I may be so bold there are a few tips I can offer:

Step 1: Fill your sink with warm sudsy water.
Step 2: Do all of your dishes and clean your work surface
Step 3: Drain the sink and refill it with sudsy water
Step 4: Start cooking
Step 5: If you dirty a dish or utensil, clean it RIGHT AWAY!
Step 6: Goto step 3 and repeat until you are finished cooking

* With cooking, go for it. You can only get better the more times you try.

* Double sinks should be the standard, if you only have one of those huge single tubs one should get their head examined. 1 sink for clean, one sink for rinse, one rack to dry. *rant over.

* Ramen, for me, is tied with Thai and Indian. It is in its essence Umami. Just don't use as much noodle as this f**k tard did at the end of the video

noims said:

Not sure I'd be able to make this all that quickly, but I agree it would take longer to clean up.

I do have a sudden inexplicable craving for noodles, though. It is pretty late, so I might just have a bath.

OverLord (Member Profile)

Robot sorting system sorts 200,000 packages per day

RFlagg says...

They look like a smaller variation of Amazon's robots that move their racks around.

But god... that music... I could barely watch the video.

Looks Like Trump is Now Peddling Russian Propaganda

radx says...

I'm basically done with defending WikiLeaks as well, after the shit they pulled with the leaks of Turkish data. Completely irresponsible, that one.

However, WikiLeaks doesn't need credibility -- the data does. And the data they published vis-á-vis Clinton/Podesta/DNC is, as of now, solid. There was one fake document, but that was shown to have been injected by someone other than WL.

"Strong bias" -- oh, I do have a strong bias. Plural, as in biases, actually. For instance, I'm disinclined to take anything the US intelligence agencies say at face value, given how they manufactured more than one casus belli. I don't put much weight into (un-)official statements in general, but especially since all the misinformation they spread about issues like the coup in Honduras or the actions of Nazi militias in Ukraine.

In this particular case, however, my argument is much simpler: Occam's razor seems much more likely than malicious intent. Propaganda outlets on both sides are run by people. Maybe the propaganda outlet Sputnik intentionally twisted the content of email, or maybe they just fucked up, like people are wont to do. Maybe someone intentionally fed Trump this bad info, maybe his people are just as incompetent as he is.

There are too many parts in this that include people who have more than once proven themselves to be utterly incompetent, or in complete ignorance of even the concept of truth. I don't think Trump gives a shit about truth or facts, he strikes me as the typical blowhard who spouts whatever shit comes to mind, and spins stories on the fly like a 4-year-old when caught red-handing.

No need for a conspiracy there, with all this incompetence, naiveté and plain disregard for facts.

So when they keep on pushing the Russian angle in this, it just seems like a desperate attempt to conjure up the old unifying enemy. Why worry about Russian propaganda when there's plenty on FOX and MSNBC/CNN? Why worry about Russian hackers when you accept the unbelievably insecure method of eletronic votes, partly without paper trails, and completely controlled by private companies?

It's just very strange to an outsider like me to see them focus on perceived external influences when the internals are a complete clusterfuck. And this presidential election is the biggest clusterfuck I've seen in 30 years, which doesn't mean much, admittedly.

That said, we can't just be looking at it from the outside with binoculars, not when people are back to full-blown Cold War rhetoric. When the ruling class in the US and/or the ruling class in Russia start their pissing contests and other forms of grandstanding, it's usually brown people who pay the price, like they have been in Syria for the last couple of years. And Libya. And Yemen. And Somalia. And Afghanistan, And Iraq. And Pakistan.

Personally, all the rhetoric about "standing up to Russian aggression" and similar nonsense makes me keenly aware that the bridge just outside my hometown was constructed with a shaft to place explosives in, to slow down advancing Soviet troops... so yes, I would very much like to bitch-slap all these warmongerers on both sides, but particularly the ones in the US since they are currently the ones racking up the highest death toll.

Edit: I should have made it clearer. Yes, WL is absolutely biased against Clinton and they do seem to act in support of Trump. Assange in particular. Which bums me out to no end, since I actually met the guy in person when they presented WL at the 26C3.

Januari said:

I wouldn't in any way suggest that Olberman's credibility is unassailable, however i wouldn't put it one iota above wikileaks anymore.

Your own fairly strong bias not withstanding, i completely understand why wouldn't trust government bodies. However Greenwald's article (as much as i got through) seem to hing entirely on that premise that you can't prove this all hatches from some shadowy russian agency or from the desk of Putin himself. And on that he is probably right, even if US intelligence has proof they'd like not publicly air it.

But to ignore the body of trump's comments, people who've worked for him, his own dealings and associations, isn't 'helping' either. And to do it you have to really want to believe in an organization which increasingly fails to meet its promises and seems to be operating under its own agenda, and a man who seems far more interested in promoting his brand.

To me the point of the video is to demonstrate how easily it is to manipulate Trump, and certainly nothing i saw in that article you posted dissuades me from that.

THE CRUELTY BEHIND OUR CLOTHING - WOOL

transmorpher says...

Lambasting Pt.2

Human milk, GROSS! Cockroach milk, GROSS! Milk from a cow that's been facing in one direction for 4 years on a concrete floor, pumped with antibiotics, forcibly impregnated on what the industry calls a "rape rack" over and over, and fed bonemeal from it's dead neighboring milking cows, YUM!

I'm trying to raise awareness. This empowers people to make better decisions. And you try your best to beat me on a technicality or to discredit the host so that you can keep pretending none of this is real.



It just hit me. I just realised that your family and friends have farms. Now I understand the hostility. You're taking this as a personal attack on your family and friends, and on as an attack on their livelihoods.

Well my advice is to sell now and invest in new technology, the change is coming regardless of how hard animal farmers fight back.

newtboy said:

We also have people trying to sell cockroach milk for human consumption. Count me out.

Yeast milk is identical to cow milk in the same way my piss is identical to lemonade. It's yellow and wet...see, identical.

OK, I'm al for genetically engineering a sheep that wants to be sheered, and is intelligent enough and articulate enough to tell you so. Even better if it wants to be eaten too and can tell you about which parts of it are the most succulent. The problem then becomes keeping it from interbreeding with real sheep and driving them extinct....I guess we'll have to castrate them all. ;-)

How the Gun Industry Sells Self-Defense | The New Yorker

MilkmanDan says...

I'm quite pro gun rights generally, but to me it seems insane that "self defense" is the #1 stated reason for owning a gun in the US now.

Jim Jeffries' bit on self defense covers my concerns in a pretty funny but honest way. In your home, keeping your guns in an accessible place where they could easily be used in a self-defense situation makes them not safe. Much more likely to have accidents, or have a criminal end up with them and using them on you. Securely storing them away from ammo to prevent those issues precludes using them for self defense. Catch-22.

For concealed carry, that's a bit different. With the right kind of setup, I suppose that I must admit that the risks of accidents could be low, the chances of needing to use the weapon low, but some real potential for situations where some people would be better off having a weapon than not.

...There are some *major* caveats to that, though. For example, if I was black, I'd never concealed carry because that seems like a recipe for disaster. Is that fair, or reasonable? Fuck no. But it is reality.

I think personally as a white country-bumpkin dude, if I was going to carry semi-frequently, I'd go with the old redneck standby of a shotgun or hunting rifle on a rack in the back window of my pickup. Lock it to the rack with a combination lock, and keep ammo separately in a glove compartment or something with another combination lock. If I actually needed it, it would be there.


One thing I do agree with @Mordhaus 100% on is that suicides should NOT be considered, or at the very least should be specifically denoted as suicides, when showing numbers for "gun violence" or "gun crimes".

How do vending machines figure out if coins are fake or not?

ForgedReality says...

I can't tell you how many times I've seen a snack get caught leaning against the rack and the glass. How does rotating the coils more help in that situation? Answer: IT DOESN'T! The machines are never taking over the world. They'd be forever awkwardly falling all over themselves trying.

Big Boobs Problems

newtboy says...

Um...yeah, but women's clothing comes designed for their body type. How about buy clothes that fit, they exist. How about not put on a sausage casing then complain that it's a sausage casing!
That can be an issue with off the rack clothes, but she's never worn those in her life! She buys expensive clothing, clearly, and can buy it to fit, and can buy some that covers her up if she wants, and still be fitting. She may have to shop to find them, but she shouldn't pretend those clothes don't exist.
I accuse her of being pathological because she continuously demonstrates clothing that exposes her cleavage to the maximum, the entire time complaining that 'oh my god, people look at my enormous, exposed cleavage'. It's a bit like the guy from Cameo complaining someone's looking at his enormous fire engine red, studded leather cod piece.

00Scud00 said:

Or, the clothing is tight because most of it was designed for people with much less up there than she has. It sounds like she has a similar problem that fat people probably have, only it's just one part of her body.
I wonder if part of the problem is that to get enough material to cover those fun bags means the rest of you looks like you're wearing a circus tent.
So it seems a bit unfair to accuse her of having a pathological need to show off her tits when pretty much nothing short of a portable sports dome will ever really conceal those twin death stars.

Makin' A Pizza | Rap Recipe Music Video

cason says...

I like that thin cracker crust.
Stretch the dough as thin as possible, brush a little oil, light on toppings (less moisture), 550, bottom rack, pizza stone, 5 minutes. Crispity crunchity perfection.

Baby elephant causes havoc at home



Send this Article to a Friend



Separate multiple emails with a comma (,); limit 5 recipients






Your email has been sent successfully!

Manage this Video in Your Playlists