I don't "dead" those. It is a pain, but it is a two second pain. I can click on the link and watch on YouTube. I'm not comfortable taking the votes and the star from a Sifter just because I have to click one more time.

I'm a big kid. I can handle it.


>> ^xxovercastxx:

>> ^Boise_Lib:
If a video says, "embedding disabled, please watch on Youtube" is it considered dead? I mean if you can't watch it here what good is it to us?

Yes, it's dead. If it's not embedded, it's not sifted.

I totally agree with Jigga, and besides, all you people need to watch Louis CK's "Do your job" bit one more time.

Just one more time *promote

>> ^bareboards2:

I'm so confused now by the whole thing, I don't know what to think. I am sure that he loves his daughter. His original comment was just a silly joke -- he had no way of knowing she would react that way. See the purple werewolf story above. Filming the incident wasn't cool, but the rest of it actually didn't bother me that much. He seems a loving father and he knew his daughter well enough to get her smiling before teasing her one more time into a big pout.
>> ^chilaxe:
@bareboards2
I'm surprised only 2 people downvoted this video. It's a parent saying something stupid to his 4-year-old, then finding humor in something inappropriate.



I actually agree with both of you.

chilaxe, I agree--that's why I put the tag, "mean daddy" on this. I think it's so easy to tease little kids that it sometimes gets out of hand. I think her reaction would be the same if he'd told her that her hair would be green on her birthday.

bareboards2, I'm completely confused by this place and some of the humor that's found here. But, I fully agree with the admin's about freedom of expression.

I'm so confused now by the whole thing, I don't know what to think. I am sure that he loves his daughter. His original comment was just a silly joke -- he had no way of knowing she would react that way. See the purple werewolf story above. Filming the incident wasn't cool, but the rest of it actually didn't bother me that much. He seems a loving father and he knew his daughter well enough to get her smiling before teasing her one more time into a big pout.

>> ^chilaxe:

@bareboards2
I'm surprised only 2 people downvoted this video. It's a parent saying something stupid to his 4-year-old, then finding humor in something inappropriate.

I don't understand... this is a joke, right?

So this is just some internet editing, not an actual change made by Lucasfilm, yes?

I can't bring myself to believe he would add "no" to episode 6, just because it's such a dumb thing to do.

That said, it doesn't matter anymore. The prequel films have already ruined star wars so much for me, that the only time I'd watch any of it again is to maybe hear Redlettermedia rip it apart one more time.

>> ^shinyblurry:
As far as who won this encounter..that woman walked away convicted of her sin, which was fairly obvious if you paid attention to how she was emoting.

A common misinterpretation by Christians. I've been a non-Christian in a Christian family for most of my life and every time I get into a logical debate my frustration with the absolute stupidity of their logic is always misinterpreted as my heart's conviction. "Oh, see him turn red, watch how the conviction of his sin causes him embarrassment." No, sorry, I was turning red because I'm angry at your asinine assumptions and projected judgements. Say "it's what the Bible says" one more time. Say it. Say it's not YOU making the judgement. "The Bible told me to say that. Not me. Not me." You're just doing your part to save the souls of the world. Oh thank you thank you. I didn't realize that. Please, waste my time some more by mocking me, feigning ignorance, then expecting a pleasant response. How childish are the convictions of Christians!

Dude, you label your opposition socialists, communists, call Obama childish names, etc. all the dang time! That's all you do! You haven't proven a single thing with any credible scientific data. Not one thing. There are some basic facts that illustrate global warming:

http://climate.nasa.gov/images/evidence_CO2.jpg

http://www.skepticalscience.com/images/CO2-Emissions-vs-Levels.gif

Now you show your cards. What precisely do you object to about the theory? Do you object to CO2 being deemed a greenhouse gas? That CO2 levels are in fact rising? That humans are the main culprit to CO2 levels rising? That temperatures globally are rising? What?!

And btw, it's a silly argument that we don't know for sure because it's a scientific theory. If the best evidence suggests global destruction caused by this phenomena, then it would be wise to move as quickly as possible to take action to stop it. It's like sitting on railroad tracks, hearing a train horn in the distance, feeling rumblings on the ground, but deciding you're not gonna move until it's too late. After all, the train could stop well short. It could be someone making train noises, with small earthquakes going at the same time.

>> ^quantumushroom:

The most effective way to deal with such a problem for capitalists is simply deny the problem actually exists. Your problem is you desperately want there to not be a problem to fit your capitalist ideology, so you will not ever be convinced that global warming is real and human influenced. This is largely because if it is real, it likely cannot be dealt with using market forces solely, and your ideology will be irreparably destroyed.
This is just a silly ad hominem attack. One more time: the direct correlation between man-made activity (industry) and global warming remains scientifically unproven. Plenty of theories, NO demonstrable proof.
No, heropsycho, I have no interest in personally labeling anyone, as if that would solve anything.

...if the left could prove that man-made global warming was dangerous, and there was a solution to be found to the global warming "problem", the solution wouldn't arrive via socialist edicts, the free market would find it.

First off, thanks for proving my point. You have no interest in hearing about any problem that turns your political ideology on its head. This pretty much seals the deal of what your motives actually are.

Which problem would that be? The correlation between man-made activity (industry) and global warming remains scientifically unproven. Plenty of theories, NO demonstrable proof. This would be fine, except the alarmists wish to radically change the world to suit their "vision" in aforementioned ways. Not just tomorrow but 100 years from now. We've seen this collectivist BS repackaged and resold over and over again, and the result is always the same: central planning by elites = failure.

My "motive" is this: I wish to live free, it's my GOD-given right to live free. Or, if you prefer, it's a NATURAL right to live free, and this right cannot be "revoked" by any legit government. Pure anarchy doesn't work, so a free society surrenders some freedom to achieve the maximum amount of freedom possible.

Now along come the warming alarmists. They have declared, in hysterical fashion, that our dynamic ever-changing global climate now poses a threat because it isn't doing what they assumed it would do, without even knowing what is "normal". By some accounts, we're way past due for another ice age.

Private property rights and free markets have proven they're the best ways to manage both themselves and the "common good", which too often is code for non-competitive hangers-on and government incompetence. Capitalism creates ecologically-friendly goods when they're what consumers want. Capitalism creates new, more efficient technologies.

Does this mean capitalism is perfect? NOPE. Humans are selfish and regulation is necessary, but the latter is not a "solution" to all of life's problems any more than capitalism.

In the case of global warming, just for the sake of this discussion, assume that yes, burning of fossil fuels is causing global warming, and that global warming is in fact detrimental to humans.

Then there's still no easy answer. The burning of fossil fuels has made a high standard of living for nations which in turn grow food and build technology to sell to less advanced nations. Global warming (or cooling) simply cannot be detrimental to all humans at the same time. So assuming--for the sake of argument--that the alarmists' theories were somehow proven, there is still no solution, only trade-offs.

Free markets and private property rights are not utopian. HOWEVER, while they may not self-correct to the exacting standards of some, they're a hell of a lot more responsive and 'organic' than governments, whose motives are all over the map.

The most effective way to deal with such a problem for capitalists is simply deny the problem actually exists. Your problem is you desperately want there to not be a problem to fit your capitalist ideology, so you will not ever be convinced that global warming is real and human influenced. This is largely because if it is real, it likely cannot be dealt with using market forces solely, and your ideology will be irreparably destroyed.

This is just a silly ad hominem attack. One more time: the direct correlation between man-made activity (industry) and global warming remains scientifically unproven. Plenty of theories, NO demonstrable proof.

No, heropsycho, I have no interest in personally labeling anyone, as if that would solve anything.

Ah, 60 seconds ... should have checked one more time.

*isdupe

>> ^Lawdeedaw:

I said it before, and I will say it one more time. Rome burns and I hear a fiddle.


There was no such thing as a fiddle that long ago...he probably played the lyre.

I said it before, and I will say it one more time. Rome burns and I hear a fiddle.

Tracklist

Alphabeat - Boyfriend
Alphabeat - Fascination
Bag Raiders - Shooting Stars
Black Eyed Peas - Gotta Feeling
Britney Spears - ...Baby One More Time
Capsule - Can I Have A Word
Chromeo - Mamma's Boy
Coldplay - Viva La Vida
Daft Punk - Aerodynamic
Daft Punk - Around The World
Deadmau5 - Raise Your Weapon (Madeon Remix)
Deadmau5 - Right This Second
Ellie Goulding - Starry Eyed
ELO - Mr. Blue Sky
Girls Aloud - Biology
Gorillaz - Dare
Gossip - Heavy Cross (Fred Falke Remix)
Gwen Stefani - What You Waitin For (Jacques Lu Cont Mix)
Housse de Racket - Oh Yeah
Justice - DVNO
Justice - Phantom Part II
Katy Perry - One Of The Boys
Ke$ha - Take It Off
Kylie Minogue - Wow
Lady Gaga - Alejandro
Linkin Park - Crawling
Madonna - Hung Up
Martin Solveig ft. Dragonette - Boys and Girls
Michael Jackson - Billie Jean
Nero - Me and You
One Republic - All The Right Moves (Danger Remix)
One-T - Magic Key
Ratatat - Shempi
Solange - I Decided (Freemasons Remix)
Stardust - Music Sounds Better With You
The Buggles - Video Killed The Radio Star
The Killers - Losing Touch
The Who - Baba O'Riley (SebastiAn Remix)
Yelle - Que Veux Tu (Madeon Remix)

Here's a good joke. Apparently one of Bill Clinton's favorites. A guy wearing a ski mask walks into a sperm bank with a gun and tells the lady working behind the front desk to open the vault. The lady pleaded with him, told him he must be confused because this was a sperm bank, not a real bank. But the man didn't let up, so she complied.

Inside the vault, he ordered her at gunpoint to drink a test tube of sperm. So she does. Then he holds the gun to her head and orders her to drink another. So she pops open another tube and downs it. Finally he orders her to do it one more time, and she does. After that he asks her, "How do you feel?" She replied, "I feel fine, I guess."

The man pulls off his mask revealing himself to be her husband and says, "See, it's not so bad, is it?"

These guys are one of the 3 groups of crazy people who get paid to do stupid shit: Dudesons, Jackass, and Dirty Sanchez. And that video... was insane. That last bit with the demolition, was beyond insanity. It actually was so insane, it became sane again, and then went insane one more time.