Woah there! Is that Nicole Kidman looking like a frozen hyena getting strangled?

>> ^FlowersInHisHair:
Why didn't Nicole Kidman applaud? Cold-hearted bitch.

She was not programmed to laugh at that point in the awards show. Could've been a programming error, or maybe they were trying to save on fuel. I heard she runs on diesel.

Why didn't Nicole Kidman applaud? Cold-hearted bitch.

They forgot...

The Firm (outruns hitmen and other lawyers)
All the Right Moves (outruns football players)
Far and Away (outruns Nicole Kidman)

This video has been declared a duplicate; transferring votes to the original video and killing this dupe - dupeof declared by maatc.

Lets try again:

*dupeof=http://www.videosift.com/video/Channel-Ad-with-Nicole-Kidman

>> ^looris:
this one has much better video and audio quality, but lacks the ending titles.


Good find! Don´t know about you, but I can live without the end titles and better video and audio are the winning argument. Plus the other one was first, despite being discarded!

So lets free the other one from it´s discarded dungeon by whispering the magic words *dupeof=http://www.videosift.com/video/Channel-Ad-with-Nicole-Kidman

this one has much better video and audio quality, but lacks the ending titles.

Oh, come on, nothing in that film was breathtaking.

It had some nice moments, some seriously plumped up Nicole Kidman lips... Sam Elliot playing, well, Sam Elliot... but anything that was breathtaking, this was a fairly by the book battle scene really, at least in today's age of cg Lord of the Rings, then The Lion the Witch and the Wardrobe etc.

Thats nice, but what I really want to know is what Jackie Chan has to say about the recent lead paint scandals from Chinese toy factories.

And what does Nicole Kidman think about the lady imprisoned in Indonesia for alledgedly importing a bale of weed in her snowboard bag?

Until I get the news from actors, it doesn't sink in.

Nicole Kidman too: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8774701029343396840

NO NO NO! Nicole Kidman CANNOT I repeat CANNOT act!

>> ^Sarzy:
And no, I didn't just pick the first sex video I found and throw it up here. I really and truly believe that this is a great video, something people should see and worthy of being on the site.


Sarzy, my agreeing it is a great scene does nothing to alleviate my strong feeling that it shouldn't be here. I can find tons of beautiful, magical, artistic sex scenes from world cinema. There are probably sites for appreciating that kind of content, but I don't want this to be one of them. Porn has a connotation of cheap : fair enough, don't call this porn; this is adult content. I don't know about this being something "people should see." I bet I can find tons of more moving, more arousing, more beautiful sex scenes, at least by my lights. There is no social crusade needed here. This isn't a dirty secret that needed to be exposed. Yes, Nicole kidman's character is more turned on by her own beauty than the touch of her lover. Not earth shattering. The Greeks talked about that a couple of thoousand years ago.

Comment hidden because you are ignoring dag. (show it anyway)

OK yeah- here's the deal. The Internet is full of porn - I've heard. When we started VideoSift - we intentionally decided to make VideoSift a "porn free zone" not necessarily because we hate porn, but just because pornish type content in online video is so prevalent.

I don't know how many times I've done this over the last 2 years, but pop over to VideoBomb and check out their "most watched" section to see why adult content is not a good idea on a video voting site.

Maybe this isn't porn- but it's sexual content designed to arouse. It definitely arouses me. (yes, it fails that test- it's Nicole Kidman's bum!) So I don't think this should be here.

Tags for this video have been changed from 'channel, ad, nicole kidman' to 'chanel, ad, nicole kidman, baz luhrmann' - edited by Issykitty