>> ^Jinx:

I have old emails that read like this...I pray they never see the light of day. Ever.

Ok actually they weren't this bad. For one they didn't have eyebrows. Nor did I call her babygirl constantly or end with....STAY PERFECT. JUST FOR ME MWAHAHAHA.

Yeah yeah, sorry fearless leader. I'll tone it down from now on.

..you know i'm right tho. mwahahaha = P

>> ^dag:

Hi there. This is a non-expiring official warning for your ad hom comment. Please attack the idea, not the person. Thanks
In reply to this comment by GenjiKilpatrick:
You bag of shit. Show some respect.
In reply to this comment by lantern53:
That Wheldon was a greedy type, trying to win $5 million dollars in this race.
Why should a guy who drives a car make so much more money than a taxi driver?
The gov't needs to control this kind of greed.

mwahahaha.

Mwahahaha and now I know where @MarineGunrock LIVES!

I'm gonna poop in his yard!>> ^MarineGunrock:

I fucking hate shit like this. I recently received a notice of violation from the city regarding my car being parked in my front year. How much grass do you see in any of the front yards here? None. All the yards here are rock and gravel. It's too costly and wasteful to maintain grass in 115 degree summers. Keep in mind it's not some shitty, broken-down car on blocks. It's an 04 Volvo S60 that's in perfect running order with no cosmetic damage. It's my fucking yard. I should be able to park my car there. I understand that the intent of the law is to keep heaps of junk from being stashed there, but fuck.

>> ^longde:

Rougy, taken to its extremes, why not give every good student in the world public student loans?


Uhm.. that sounds like a fantastic idea! Tho instead of loans maybe it could be vouchers to redeem the cost of classes successfully mastered.

Slowly forcing the entire world to become educated. Mwahahaha!

Dance little froggies, DANCE! MWAHAHAHA!

Yes! I was going to add that I've gotten really good at clipping them on my own, but when we only had Issy, I would have dft hold and distract her with a toy while I quickly clipped away. She would be too confused to fight it. Mwahahaha!

>> ^Deano:
british
For us this is a two man job. I hold the cat while standing and my sister does the cutting. Then they get treats straight after to compensate for the trauma

somebody should give him a ghost pepper. mwahahaha

mwahahaha... another addict born !

In reply to this comment by Doc_M:
Curse you Qruel. I'm stuck on "Handling" and it's freaking 4 am. doggonit. My roommate's light is also on. I introduced him to this today. mwahahaha.

Curse you Qruel. I'm stuck on "Handling" and it's freaking 4 am. doggonit. My roommate's light is also on. I introduced him to this today. mwahahaha.

I'll admit I have one person on my ignore list, though ironically I often click to see what he said. hehe. If you know me well, you will be able to easily guess. Otherwise. mwahahaha.

Light is both a particle and a wave. It seems confusing to average Joe, and it may seem to be a paradox, but the definition of "paradox" is: An assertion that is essentially self-contradictory, though based on a valid deduction from acceptable premises. A paradox is not a "circular statement." That is something entirely different. That may be what you are thinking of when you think "paradox." When I was studying the quantum mechanics section of physical chemistry class, I honestly thought I would go crazy. It is NOT easily graspable. The equations that Schrodinger used and others like him used are insanely complicated. In the end, I, like everyone else, forgot all the equations and only remembered the concepts and the sheer TERROR of it all. If anyone here chooses to pursue it in curiosity, I recommend keeping to the general terms and avoiding the math... unless you're a genius or some sort of servant, that is.

Anyway, relativity is easy to buy and it has been proven. In brief, they synchronized an atomic clock "stationary" on the ground (that is, it was the "stationary" frame of reference for the experiment) and an atomic clock on a high-speed jet that proceeded to fly VERY fast around the world and such. At the end of the experiment the clock on the jet was BEHIND the one on the ground. There were significant and quality controls in place that allow us to conclude that time itself was moving at a relatively slower rate on the jet than it was on the ground. Light is related to both velocity and "length" of space. A GREAT explanation can be easily found on Wikipedia.

The mind-boggling part of this is that if you are on the top of a high mountain, you are experiencing time at a slower rate than those in a valley. Soooo, if you wanna life a millionth of a second longer than the Jones's in the valley, get thee to a mountain.

Also of note, several authors have used special relativity as a key part in their works, see the "Ender's Game" series (A LEGENDARY CLASSIC) in which Ender et.al. sometimes jets off into space at HUGE speeds in order to let a HUGE amount of time pass before he returns.

I absolutely love special relativity, but it really complicates everything. Newton may have been right about a number of things, but not on a quantum level. And not in reality in fact. Chaos theory is the new Newtonian theory. Now THAT is fun stuff.

In brief? Chaos Theory is the idea that in order for one to understand an event in REALITY, one must include EVERY SINGLE VARIABLE in addition to Newtonian physical calculation. That means: the mass of the object, the wind, the air resistance, the chemical make-up of the air at that moment and throughout the experiment, the particulate matter in the air, the light amount and angle, the gravity, the velocity relative to the many gravity sources, the many gravity sources, the human error, the sensor error, and on and on and on. This is of basically impossible since it would change constantly... in other words, it would change so fast that you would not be able to isolate a single moment with everything stable. mwahahaha fun.

And all this makes Rougy's citation absolutely relevant: "We don't see things as they are, we see them as we are."

Good quote, dude.

MWAHAHAHA, that was brilliant! You are living proof that most dames on the Sift are blessed with a sense of humor.

In reply to this comment by karkarlee:
Ima spam your profile with my lovins.

Mwahahaha... its back! Well... sort of.

I think gwaan was jut raising it because of the anti-snuff policy clayton (as opposed to having a moral objection).

though he seems to have exposed his weakness.... apparently if you add a kangaroo tag to your clips he'll vote for them without even thinking about it - mwahahaha!