" "Explicit sexual content" is defined on VideoSift as gratuitous nudity of a sexual nature lacking any reasonable artistic and educational merit, implying its sole intent is to cause sexual arousal." -- Da rules.

We're not prudes here, so 4 of those don't count of lack of proper nudity, and Girl in a Toyota is funny and has a story. Britta crosses the line and should also be * discussed. If it had been discussed and approved already, you'd have a point.>> ^xxovercastxx:

>> ^messenger:
Two aren't precedent because they have substance beyond the sexuality, and the third one is dead. The only focus of this piece is naked hot chicks. The policy is in place to keep single-purpose fap material elsewhere. I mean, is this enjoyable for any other reason?
And there's precedent for this too. There was a video with two or three hot topless women having a snowball fight. It was considered unfit for the Sift. (I searched now but couldn't find it again.) Even actual porn has been accepted, because it was a funny parody. This is nothing but boobs. I like that line to be clear.
They all work for me, but that's neither here nor there.
On the point of "single-purpose fap material"...
http://sexuality.videosift.com/video/Huh-Title-Just-a-minute
http://sexuality.videosift.com/video/Girl-in-a-To
yota-Supra-The-full-uncensored-version-in-HD
http://sexuality.videosift.com/video/Britta-from-Community-goe
s-topless-in-Choke
http://sexuality.videosift.com/video/Kate-Upton-The-Many-Talents
-of-Kate-Upton
http://sexuality.videosift.com/video/Hot-Girl-Dancing-Around-in-H
er-Underwear
http://sexuality.videosift.com/video/French-game-shows-B
ETTER-than-Japanese-game-shows
I can't call this video enjoyable for any reason but that's also neither here nor there, IMO.
I like the line to be clear as well, but it never is. It depends who submits, who complains, what day it is, which way the wind is blowing, etc. I just can't justifiably call this pornographic; certainly no more so than any of those accepted videos above.

This is actually Kate Bush's first ever TV appearance - on German TV in February 1978, she performed Kite and Wuthering Heights.

I found a longer version with the intro and both songs, http://youtu.be/NDAWhdJU6HQ

Also, for this embed:
*length=3:38
(the original was 10s longer)

>> ^messenger:

Two aren't precedent because they have substance beyond the sexuality, and the third one is dead. The only focus of this piece is naked hot chicks. The policy is in place to keep single-purpose fap material elsewhere. I mean, is this enjoyable for any other reason?
And there's precedent for this too. There was a video with two or three hot topless women having a snowball fight. It was considered unfit for the Sift. (I searched now but couldn't find it again.) Even actual porn has been accepted, because it was a funny parody. This is nothing but boobs. I like that line to be clear.

They all work for me, but that's neither here nor there.

On the point of "single-purpose fap material"...
http://sexuality.videosift.com/video/Huh-Title-Just-a-minute
http://sexuality.videosift.com/video/Girl-in-a-Toyota-Supra-The-full-uncensored-version-in-HD
http://sexuality.videosift.com/video/Britta-from-Community-goes-topless-in-Choke
http://sexuality.videosift.com/video/Kate-Upton-The-Many-Talents-of-Kate-Upton
http://sexuality.videosift.com/video/Hot-Girl-Dancing-Around-in-Her-Underwear
http://sexuality.videosift.com/video/French-game-shows-BETTER-than-Japanese-game-shows

I can't call this video enjoyable for any reason but that's also neither here nor there, IMO.

I like the line to be clear as well, but it never is. It depends who submits, who complains, what day it is, which way the wind is blowing, etc. I just can't justifiably call this pornographic; certainly no more so than any of those accepted videos above.

*quality music and message.



_{And thanks to @UsesProzac whose queendom of loungelizardland brought me to her profile to congratulate her thus exposing me to @berticus' comment to this video which was a response to @toferyu calling a soldier a kid but who cares Kate Bush okayneedtocatchmybreathnow}

♥

In reply to this comment by UsesProzac:
Oh berti, linking Kate Bush.. let me be your beard!
In reply to this comment by berticus:
Sure you do.

>> ^BoneRemake:

>> ^toferyu:
Kid should have his own show !

ya don't go calling someone who enlisted in an armed force a fucking kid.

Oh berti, linking Kate Bush.. let me be your beard!
In reply to this comment by berticus:
Sure you do.

>> ^BoneRemake:

>> ^toferyu:
Kid should have his own show !

ya don't go calling someone who enlisted in an armed force a fucking kid.

Well said @toferyu

As they'd say over on Reddit, I'll see your Kate Bush & Raise you a Paul Hardcastle

>> ^berticus:

Sure you do.
>> ^BoneRemake:
>> ^toferyu:
Kid should have his own show !

ya don't go calling someone who enlisted in an armed force a fucking kid.

>> ^kymbos:

@jimnms - link for your last para?
Meanwhile, I think you're missing the point: http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/07/22/america-is-a-violent-coun
try/
Over to you and your next move: the 'data must be wrong' argument.


Here's your source, and it didn't come out of my ass like Bill's shit.

What point I'm missing? Your linked article doesn't mention guns anywhere, it shows that America is more violent than other advanced countries, which is even more of reason to carry a gun for self defense. I think you're the one missing the point.

Ninety percent of violent crimes are committed by persons not carrying handguns. This is one reason why the mere brandishing of a gun by a potential victim of violence often is a sufficient response to a would-be attacker. In most cases where a gun is used in self-defense, it is not fired. Can the average citizen be trusted to judge accurately when he or she is in jeopardy?...

A nationwide study by Don Kates, the constitutional lawyer and criminologist, found that only 2 percent of civilian shootings involved an innocent person mistakenly identified as a criminal. The 'error rate' for the police, however, was 11 percent, more than five times as high." [source]

Of course, it is not surprising that where there are more guns, there tends to be more gun-related deaths, but northern Latin America (Brazil in particular) breaks from this trend in a major way. The area has a massive homicide by firearm rate, with some of the lowest rates of gun ownership in the world and the highest homicides by firearm count...

Brazil, Columbia, Venezuela and Ecuador combine for more homicides by firearm than Mexico, the United States, South Africa, the Philippines, Honduras, Guatemala, India, El Salvador, Dominican Republic, Bangladesh, Argentina and Jamaica put together. That is every other country with over 1,000 homicides by firearm. You would imagine that gun control would be very lax in the area, but as the top chart here illustrates, that is not the case. Brazil, for example, has roughly 255 million fewer guns (and about 115 million fewer people) than the United States and a much more strict and effective set of firearm regulations. So, while it is true that where there are guns, there is gun violence, that is clearly not the only determining factor. [source]

Ok Hottie, here'smy short list of hottest hottie hotness:

Jessica Biel

Kate Mara

Michelle Monaghan

Amy Smart & Michelle Monaghan, (whom me use to think was the same person)

Jennifer Beals

Bernadette Peters

Claudia Cardinale, Brigitte Bardot, Rita Hayworth, and

Tallulah Bankhead, who left an particularly endearing quote behind...

"Cocaine isn't habit forming. I should know-I've been using it for years."

Kate & William's wedding was one of the most powerful moments on American TV...??? Really? LOL

And Whitney Houston's death?? Well these are all pretty subjective choices lol

>> ^luxury_pie:
dead


Thanks for letting me know. It's fixed again...for now.

>> ^Trancecoach:

This is my go-to kareoke song.. no joke.. Ever since I heard Travis' cover of it, I have respect for it, as a quality piece of ballad.

My go-to is "I kissed a Girl and I liked it" by Kate Perry. I think I'm pretty funny, I imagine most others just think I'm pratt.

>> ^nomino:

I know boobs deserve an upvote, but I have to downvote because of the voice over. It's like putting ketchup in a fine red wine. I'm sorry, but I just can't support this.


Speaking of boobs. Where's your avatar from?

Funny but the VO made me laugh so hard I just had to upvote even though I hate TMZ

>> ^nomino:

I know boobs deserve an upvote, but I have to downvote because of the voice over. It's like putting ketchup in a fine red wine. I'm sorry, but I just can't support this.