>> ^swedishfriend:

This is great in a great way! If you call this trash I feel sad for you.


Yep, cool synthesized tune!!

The reason why I submitted the longer clip was that I saw jabba the Hutt and scenes from the return of the Jedi in the longer clip. The shorter clip has just astronauts. The long video has stuff from the movie - that's why I have the 'Leia approves' in the title



>> ^Hybrid:

Hmm. I see your point, and it was my bad in not noticing that the times were different. I can never remember what the best call is for potential dupes like this - where the time differs, but the intention/message of the clip remains the same. What do others think? Perhaps it needs a discussion? In the meantime, I'll call notdupe
<div><div style="margin: 10px; overflow: auto; width: 80%; float: left; position: relative;" class="convoPiece"> mintbbb said:<img style="margin: 4px 10px 10px; float: left; width: 40px;" src="http://static1.videosift.com/avatars/m/mintbbb-s.jpg" onerror="ph(this)"><div style="position: absolute; margin-left: 52px; padding-top: 1px; font-size: 10px;" class="commentarrow">◄</div><div style="padding: 8px; margin-left: 60px; margin-top: 2px; min-height: 30px;" class="nestedComment box"> If you want to call this a dupe, is OK. However, this is the whole song, and the other is a 1 minute 39 second clip. So technicall tyey are not dupes (I didn't notice the other submission when I submitted mine).
</div></div></div>
<div><div style="margin: 10px; overflow: auto; width: 80%; float: right; position: relative;" class="convoPiece"> Hybrid said:<img style="margin: 4px 10px 10px; float: right; width: 40px;" src="http://static1.videosift.com/avatars/h/Hybrid-s.jpg" onerror="ph(this)"><div style="position: absolute; margin-top: 1px; right: 52px; font-size: 10px;" class="commentarrow">►</div><div style="padding: 8px; margin-right: 60px; margin-top: 2px; min-height: 30px;" class="nestedComment box"> dupeof=http://videosift.com/video/Kicking-Ass-on-the-Keyboard
</div></div></div>

lol.

let's say this is great, but in a trash/terrible way.

>> ^westy:

>> ^looris:
lol terrible

THIS IS NOT TERRABLE IF THIS IS TERRABLE SO IS KEYBORD CAT,
IF YOU FAIL TO SEE HOW EPIC THIS IS THEN YOU NEED TO BE SHOT WITH BEAN BAGS IN THE SCROTUM, OR UTERUS

>> ^looris:

lol terrible


THIS IS NOT TERRABLE IF THIS IS TERRABLE SO IS KEYBORD CAT,

IF YOU FAIL TO SEE HOW EPIC THIS IS THEN YOU NEED TO BE SHOT WITH BEAN BAGS IN THE SCROTUM, OR UTERUS

Hmm. I see your point, and it was my bad in not noticing that the times were different. I can never remember what the best call is for potential dupes like this - where the time differs, but the intention/message of the clip remains the same. What do others think? Perhaps it needs a discussion? In the meantime, I'll call *notdupe >> ^mintbbb:

>> ^Hybrid:
dupeof=http://videosift.com/video/Kicking-Ass-on-the-Keyboard

If you want to call this a dupe, is OK. However, this is the whole song, and the other is a 1 minute 39 second clip. So technicall tyey are not dupes (I didn't notice the other submission when I submitted mine).

>> ^d00kie:

dupe of: http://videosift.com/video/Karate-Gi-Wear-it-Whenever-Whenever-Lei
a-Approves


Actually, this one is posted first (I didn't notice it when I submitted mine). However, mine is the whole song, 3 min 35 second, this is a shorter clip. So they are not exactly dupes.

>> ^Hybrid:

dupeof=http://videosift.com/video/Kicking-Ass-on-the-Keyboard


If you want to call this a dupe, is OK. However, this is the whole song, and the other is a 1 minute 39 second clip. So technicall tyey are not dupes (I didn't notice the other submission when I submitted mine).

dupe of: http://videosift.com/video/Karate-Gi-Wear-it-Whenever-Whenever-Leia-Approves

Look, there's no way to look tough playing a keyboard, but prancing in place like a Keebler Elf wearing a karate gi ain't gonna make up for it.