Did the research and added support for College Humor iframe submission.

Side note: That video is already submitted: http://videosift.com/video/Batman-Interrogation

You have been awarded 1 Power Point for fixing the embed code for Dead Pool video Jack Bauer Interrogates Chunk. Thank you for helping maintain VideoSift's reliability.

>> ^notarobot:

"This video is no longer available because the YouTube account associated with this video has been terminated."

Hilarious!>> ^BoneyD:
Hilarious!
They did actually explain this in the first film, in the scene where Reese is being interrogated by the police. Although, his character didn't fully understand the physics behind it...
See here at around 1.55 (great scene!)



Ha, I thought the same thing... I thought maybe it was a tongue-in-cheek custom notice. But no.

"This video is no longer available because the YouTube account associated with this video has been terminated."



Hilarious!>> ^BoneyD:

Hilarious!
They did actually explain this in the first film, in the scene where Reese is being interrogated by the police. Although, his character didn't fully understand the physics behind it...
See here at around 1.55 (great scene!)

This was really stupid. I was watching it live and a few MPs were really grilling the Murdochs, including the one who was interrupted by this pie attack. If you don't like Rupert Murdoch, let him be interrogated! All this did was give him sympathy because you just hit an 80-year old man in the face. Now, instead of the headlines being about some of the questions that were asked and their responses, they're about pie.

Gentlemen, I give you an alternate way to extract information other than waterboarding. (And it's fun for the interrogator too.)

>> ^soulmonarch:

You can choose to say the 'magic words', but obviously your mind isn't convinced, so you still aren't saved by it.


@soulmonarch
I agree with the logic of thisbut I have to ask how you, as a Christian, don't find this remark kind of .. disturbing? It reminds me of one of the more grueling aspects of George Orwells "1984", namely how you're not only forced to comply, and forced to accept as unchangeable all the lies and distortions of "The Party", they are not happy with you lying, you have to actually believe it.. So for instance, in one scene Winston Smith is subjected to torture, and the interrogator shows him 3 fingers and asks how many it is, and then how many it is if the Party says its 5. The natural thing for Winston is to answer correctly "three", or to lie and say "five" to avoid torture. But his interrogator calmly explains to him that lying or playing stupid wont work. Eventually he gives up and says "I dont know!" "Better", says the interrogator.


If you genuinely think that I wont be "saved" unless I actually believe in something I really cant make myself believe, and I cant even lie and pretend to believe.. Don't you find that unsettling? What does that really tell you about Christianity?, about God?

One common argument for supporting waterboarding/"enhanced interrogation techniques" is that terrorists wouldn't hesitate to torture and wouldn't care about prisoner rights.

While true, that still should have no bearing on how we choose to treat others. It really is the political equivalent of "but Johnny's parents let him do this." To which we would reply that it doesn't matter what Johnny's parents let him do or how other kids act, we are different.

A moral that acts one way only if someone treats you in the same fashion isn't a moral at all. Cheers to you, Senator McCain.

Some of it is shameless trolling for votes, which actually hasn't been all that effective.

Promoting Obama's interview with 60 minutes? That was for me. I thought he did a great job. I am still bone deep embarrassed by Bush II's presidency. To have an articulate intelligent person represent our country so well.... yeah. Promote that baby.

I do wish they had grilled him about what level of interrogation methods were used to gather the intell. I suspect they were told not to ask that, for "national security reasons." That is -- we don't want to be embarrassed on the global scene.

But other than that, I am proud of Obama.

In reply to this comment by eric3579:
You've gone absolutely bin laden crazy

For those who were about to ask:
"a warning that is required to be given by police in the United States to criminal suspects in police custody (or in a custodial interrogation) before they are interrogated to inform them about their constitutional rights." - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miranda_warning

Your video, Master Interrogation Technique: Awkwardness, has made it into the Top 15 New Videos listing. Congratulations on your achievement. For your contribution you have been awarded 1 Power Point.

Thanks for the promote, mate!

In reply to this comment by Zifnab:
*promote

you pricked everyone by chasing the next level up. You made less people laugh by seconding a dupe without giving it time of exposure. Thats that. whatever gets ya to the next level though !

In reply to this comment by chicchorea:
If you prick us, do we not bleed?

If you tickle us, do we not laugh?


http://videosift.com/video/Bruce-Lee-is-REALLY-bad-at-interrogating-people:

In reply to this comment by BoneRemake:
Prolly hurt your feelings to know that I'd of done it if it was you as well
RULES IS RULES GUY. Why have rules if they are not enforced. first thing that popped into my head is overcasts snuff post... slippery slope I tell ya, slippery slope.


>> ^BoneRemake:

Buncha pricks at the redirect. thats you two. PRICKS. PRICK 1 AND PRICK 2. COULD NOT GIVE IT A COUPLE HOURS.

If you prick us, do we not bleed?

If you tickle us, do we not laugh?


http://videosift.com/video/Bruce-Lee-is-REALLY-bad-at-interrogating-people:

In reply to this comment by BoneRemake:
Prolly hurt your feelings to know that I'd of done it if it was you as well
RULES IS RULES GUY. Why have rules if they are not enforced. first thing that popped into my head is overcasts snuff post... slippery slope I tell ya, slippery slope.


>> ^BoneRemake:

Buncha pricks at the redirect. thats you two. PRICKS. PRICK 1 AND PRICK 2. COULD NOT GIVE IT A COUPLE HOURS.

Comment hidden because you are ignoring dag. (show it anyway)

I agree with this. We shouldn't be afraid to ban people, but we can also exercise judgement on what's best for the Sift and show mercy. So both of you are right - in the end, no harm done as I've reinstated, and he/she got the message.

In reply to this comment by eric3579:
I see them more as guidelines then rules. I try and make decisions based on what's in the sifts best interest.
This person wanted to be a legitimate member, as could be seen by the message they left. The rules are not black and white. Anyway it's not that big a deal. I just wanted to let you know that you can use your own discretion when it comes to the rules.

Did you finish the bathroom. I wanted to check out the picks.

In reply to this comment by BoneRemake:
Prolly hurt your feelings to know that I'd of done it if it was you as well

RULES IS RULES GUY. Why have rules if they are not enforced. first thing that popped into my head is overcasts snuff post... slippery slope I tell ya, slippery slope.

In reply to this comment by eric3579:
Yes,you are. Just a bit. We would rather not ban people if they see they have made a mistake,and are willing to correct it.

In reply to this comment by BoneRemake:
Am I a asshole for seconding the *BAn ?


.
Oops !

it slipped.