O diretor do Supera- Ginástica para o cérebro, Antônio Carlos Perpétuo ensina quais os exercícios utilizados na ginástica cerebral no programa Manhã Maior da Rede Tv. O Supera é um sistema de ensino e treinamento individualizado que visa o desenvolvimento pessoal e profissional, potencializando a criatividade, a concentração, o raciocínio lógico, a autoconfiança, a autoestima, a disciplina e a perseverança. Desenvolve, também, conceitos como planejamento pessoal, relacionamento interpessoal, inteligência financeira, atitudes construtivas e muitos outros.

Site: http://www.metodosupera.com.br

The thumbnail image for this video has been updated - thumbnail added by ZappaDanMan.

How the Gin-grinch ruined Christmas.

You know it's getting bad for hardcore right wingers when they're coming up with ridiculous, incomprehensible names like "TrogLibDytes". Are those liberal followers of the almighty Trogdor, who looks to spread burnination among all peasants and their thatch-roof cottages?

Or is that a typo for "ProgLibDytes", which is similar, but with less majesty?

I can't tell anymore. You should just keep the name calling to terms like "Communist" and "Socialist". It's easier for people without a brain to follow you.

As for obsessing over one economic statistic, which economic statistics should we be focusing on? Unemployment rate? Which one is going to paint the economy the way you want it to be, not for how it is. You can't just pretend severe economic inequality doesn't exist just because the policies you favor led to it.

>> ^Winstonfield_Pennypacker:

Sigh.
ProgLibDytes really need to get over thier obsession with the GINI index, which was created by a fascist as a trick to gin up the sheeple masses. The whole "Income Gap" is just a new label to a decades old fascist propoganda tool. Anyone with two brain cells to rub together sees such naked hate-mongering exactly for what it is. Obsessing over a single economic statistic is like using one pixel in a 24,000,000 pixel image to describe a whole thing.
People like Cunk and all the TrogLibDyte acolytes that slurp down all his verbal diarrhea love to talk about nothing but the income gap because it is one of the rare few economic stats (out of thousands) that strikes a chord with the masses who are ignorant of real economics. Same motive as the reason the fascists created the GINI index. Get people mad at a small target and they are easy to manipulate. Hows it feel, ProgLibDytes, knowing that you are so easily suckered in by the same tricks used by the Nazis? Obama's mentor - Saul Alinsky - would be proud as he literally wrote the book on methods for flim-flamming the slow and the stupid. Change one word in his rant, and you can't tell the difference betwen Cunk and Gobbels.

Sigh.

ProgLibDytes really need to get over thier obsession with the GINI index, which was created by a fascist as a trick to gin up the sheeple masses. The whole "Income Gap" is just a new label to a decades old fascist propoganda tool. Anyone with two brain cells to rub together sees such naked hate-mongering exactly for what it is. Obsessing over a single economic statistic is like using one pixel in a 24,000,000 pixel image to describe a whole thing.

People like Cunk and all the TrogLibDyte acolytes that slurp down all his verbal diarrhea love to talk about nothing but the income gap because it is one of the rare few economic stats (out of thousands) that strikes a chord with the masses who are ignorant of real economics. Same motive as the reason the fascists created the GINI index. Get people mad at a small target and they are easy to manipulate. Hows it feel, ProgLibDytes, knowing that you are so easily suckered in by the same tricks used by the Nazis? Obama's mentor - Saul Alinsky - would be proud as he literally wrote the book on methods for flim-flamming the slow and the stupid. Change one word in his rant, and you can't tell the difference betwen Cunk and Gobbels.

Just because someone is liberally biased doesn’t mean they can read minds, so no one knows what the people were or weren’t cheering.  Even if there were some who are cheering for the reasons neolibs discuss, it is still impossible to ascribe that intent to even a tiny fraction of the total audience.  But compounding the prejudice, neolibs apply the caricature onto entire populations who weren’t even there.
 
Prejudice and hate cause human beings to believe stereotypes as a means to quickly poison the mind.  Such poison acts as a sedative to cloud reason, mercy, and understanding.  This dulling of human beneficence makes the prepared rabble
easily manipulated and susceptible to the ginning up of anger and hate.  And finally, it creates a mob that has no problem carrying out acts of violence.  Gobbels could only tip his hat in admiration at how successful the Democrats have been at suckering in so many ready, eager, and willing neolibs to be brownshirts. 
 
At this point it is quite impossible to keep track of all the myriad abominations that neolibs use as talking points to vilify anyone who has even the slightest deviation from their radical philosophies.  This is what we get for electing a Community Organizer I.E. Rabble Rouser.  If the left-wing blogosphere is any indicator, he’s certainly good at the only ‘job’ he’s ever held before.  This is going to be a messy election not because the GOP has a few people who inappropriately cheer the principle of justice at the wrong moment.  It’s going to be messy because the radical left is about 3 hairs and some air away from lynching anyone who looks at them cock-eyed.

The thumbnail image for this video has been updated - thumbnail added by Boise_Lib.

The thumbnail image for this video has been updated - thumbnail added by Boise_Lib.

I believe he is referring to this:

"Constitution: Plymouth Gin infused with T Salon chamomile tea and blueberries, and mixed with Domaine de Canton ginger liqueur, fresh lemon juice and siphoned soda water."

The thumbnail image for this video has been updated - thumbnail added by Barseps.

>> ^marbles:

He's mischaracterizing George Orwell's views on technology.
http://revieworld.info/?p=3
George Orwell gives no evidence anywhere against his aversion to technology that he has discussed in his novel. On the contrary, his opinion is presumably neutral throughout the narration of 1984. However, his imaginations (not everything is his imagination!) portend not a very socially desirable use of technology. It is not even neutral technology. The telescreen is best being used as a propaganda machine. The microphones are used to pry upon personal conversations. There are other sophisticated gadgets to put an end to individual freedom. Since Oceania is always on war against some state or the other, such a society will make a feverish innovation in technologies.


That's an interesting read, thanks for that. I'm always looking for new perspectives on 1984; I've read it so many times.

Anyone else notice that in 1984, there is no mention of religion? Apparently that form of mind control is obsolete
Now let's all drink some victory gin and kill some proles.

You know what...I'm poor. I'll fucking admit it.

I've been laid off from no less than four different teaching jobs in the past four years. Every year I've picked up odd jobs over the summer and have been able to find a new job (not a better job just a new job). Consequently, I've had to shave things off of my budget:

>>I've stopped eating out almost altogether (I still splurge for a $5 footlong every now and again but it's few and far between.

>>I got rid of my cable.

>>I cut my grocery budget in half (while still trying to buy semi-healthy things)

>>I haven't purchased anything for my aging computer in more than a year and a half (I'm a nerd so this IS a sacrifice believe it or not)

>>I stopped going to the bar except for special occasions (bachelor party for a friend most recently) and even then the first words out of my mouth are "What are your drink specials?" I've even stopped buying booze altogether really. Only worth mentioning because lord knows I could use a neat glass of gin now and then for the nerves caused by my finances.

>>Oh and my videosift charter membership =P
-------------------------------------------------------------------

There are countless other things I haven't the space to mention and some other things I can do to shave my budget down if needed; but making ends meet is getting harder and harder to do. At the moment my budget is stretched so thin I can't take some kind of tax hike.

And to suggest that Bill Gates can't take a tax hike but I can is ludicrous. Raise his taxes and he can't buy a new Rembrandt. Raise mine and I can't buy milk.

This is like, toatahly vah-gin-all!!

@SDGundamX

Everything that humans do that isn't provided directly thru our biology is a cultural system.

Science and Religion are both results of cultural evolution.

Before scientific journals and 150 page papers on nucleotides came about, peer review was this:
"Hey man! I discovered this new way to get girls to show up at our parties! Gin rummy & Pinochle!"

'WTF dude, I know for a fact that the only girls that play pinochle are 65 year old ladies. That method will never work'

You are a scientist from birth. Science therefore is essential.
You are not religious from birth. Religion therefore is not.
~~~

To clarify, I said religion & science are geared toward "understanding the universe".
I never said "understanding the physical world".

That was your straw-man so you could talk about some metaphysical gobbledygook I guess.

But you're in even worse footing there because metaphysical things can't be proven.

Religion is useless gobbledygook and serves no purpose in a society that has advanced beyond the need for it.
~~~
Here, I'll use the example how your diet evolved to provide more support for this position.

Humans are carnivorous because early hominids found animal protein - meat - beneficial because it promoted brain & muscle growth.

Eating meat was essential because without it, early human population would have been to weak & stupid to survive.

In 2011, there is absolutely need to consume meat.

We have discovered numerous combinations of plants - like rice & beans - that provided complete proteins and some that provide all essential amino acids outright, like soybeans.

Eating meat nowadays involves massive amounts of resources - land, water, crops - not to mention all the harmful effects like - deforestation, infectious outbreaks, & increased chronic or "lifestyle" diseases like grease encrusted heart muscles.

Consuming meat - like practicing religion - is unnecessary and destructive to our environment.
You only continue to engage in it because of ignorance, propaganda and emotional attachment.
~~~

Sooo, you can keep flappin' your gums.
But until you submit some evidence and not just personal feelings..

This sift talk will continue to head nowhere very quickly