search results matching tag: family matters

» channel: weather

go advanced with your query
Search took 0.003 seconds

    Videos (25)     Sift Talk (0)     Blogs (2)     Comments (22)   

Deadbeat Non-Father, forced to pay $30K in Child Support

newtboy says...

You misunderstand. Family court can't vacate state fees levied because of ILLEGALLY IGNORING family matters (child support). That's criminal. (and please don't be silly and say 'he didn't illegally ignore anything', because as far as the state is concerned he did until he proves he did not IN COURT, where the claim can be scrutinized and verified)
Courts have the authority and processes they do because intelligent, thoughtful people designed an imperfect system to do the best we could at serving justice. Because it is now so overworked, (and in this case abused by numerous people perpetrating frauds) it no longer works as designed...not because those in it are creating their own busy work, but because there is far too much actual work. (agreed, that's a good reason to streamline any process that could be streamlined)
Um...I don't want to sit in front of a robotic judge, thank you very much.
Um...courts ARE higher and more enlightened, due to their authority granted by society and their experience dealing with it.
Often courts do work properly. This one did, it vacated his child support order as soon as he proved he was never notified. Because you don't understand the full process does not mean it's poorly designed.
Like I said, I'm glad I'm not as cynical as you....you can deny it, but you are incredibly cynical about those working in the courts. I have known some, and they do not resemble your remarks in the least. They joined the law to help people, not to become a 9-5 drone lapping up the legal honey.

scheherazade said:

If a state family court can't vacate state fees levied on account of family matters (child support), then the process is broken.

Courts have the authority they do because of the results of generations of ego driven turf wars between departments.

The rules exist for a reason : because people decided.
Nothing in court or law is based on physics or nature. it's all made up by people.

Properly would be using empirical evidence and a logical ruleset that doesn't require people to argue personal opinions - but rather strictly solve the inputs for an output.

Judges and prosecutors are people. They grimace just like anyone else.
The courts are not 'higher' or 'enlightened'. They are simply the sum of generations of personal bickering.
They don't "work properly". They simply "work as they do - whatever that may be".

Like I said, the 9 to5ers don't give a crap. It's just a time code.

-scheherazade

Deadbeat Non-Father, forced to pay $30K in Child Support

scheherazade says...

If a state family court can't vacate state fees levied on account of family matters (child support), then the process is broken.

Courts have the authority they do because of the results of generations of ego driven turf wars between departments.

The rules exist for a reason : because people decided.
Nothing in court or law is based on physics or nature. It's all made up by people.

Properly would be using empirical evidence and a logical ruleset that doesn't require people to argue personal opinions - but rather strictly solve the inputs for an output.

Judges and prosecutors are people. They grimace just like anyone else.
The courts are not 'higher' or 'enlightened'. They are simply the sum of generations of personal bickering.
They don't "work properly". They simply "work as they do - whatever that may be".

Like I said, the 9 to5ers don't give a crap. It's just a time code.

-scheherazade

newtboy said:

Yes, it is, but it's not designed to make themselves more work. That's silly.
"Decided not to"...because a family court judge can't vacate a state fee, only the support order. He has to see another judge. Family court is not superior court, and should not interfere with superior court issues.
It's not about 'making the charge stick', it's about following the same rules everyone else follows, rules designed to make a process work properly, if not faster. It's about getting the right thing done by the right people with the authority to fix it, based on the right evidence, not randomly doing what you think is right for a single defendant in a single extremely odd case based on what someone feels.

The 6 Most Unintentionally Creepy Sitcom Characters

siftbot says...

Tags for this video have been changed from 'Cracked, After Hours, Most Unintentionally Creepy, Sitcom Characters, Comedy' to 'Cracked, After Hours, saved by the bell, step by step, fresh prince, family matters' - edited by xxovercastxx

Ron Christie destroyed on Real Time

The Walking Dead: Torn Apart - "A New Day" (Webisode 1)

The Office Recut as an 80's Sitcom

The Office Recut as an 80's Sitcom

Mork calling Orson

Buck says...

>> ^BoneRemake:

in those shows, the same as Full house of family matters of whatnot, they have to recap what the episode was about, and I do not like that. They are all the same.


Mork and Mindy (and FullHouse) were made for kids (and family's) to watch. They provided some moral lessons and while not appealing to many adults were loved by the kids. (At least some kids)

Mork calling Orson

@ Dr. Phil's behest, 'golden-voiced' man to check into rehab

sixshot says...

I detest Dr. Ph(a)il. I don't know why he does the thing he does and why he's still around doing it still. What right does he have to bring in Ted and then bring the rest of his family over when Ted's life has been on high speed for with all the media attention? There's a time and place and family matters are always a delicate and tricky process to tackle. Let things settle down first. Then let him approach his family at will. It is up to him and his family on when it is the right time. And they all should know that.

This is shit judgment on Dr. Phil's part and I sure hope that idiot regrets it. I guess that "Dr." is nothing more than a fake label for him.

Homosexuality not 'valid', NY GOP Candidate says

gwiz665 says...

A lot of people tend to translate phobia to hatred, that's not the case. Because it's against people, some people tend to get extra up in arms, but I think some times that is an overreaction. People can be scared of gays, like some people are scared of heights. It happens, but that doesn't necessarily make them haters of all things gay.

There's also a level of degrees between dislike and hate; some people would rather that races were segregated, and that you only had to deal with people just like yourself, while others seem to want to make the whole world into people just like themselves. I think, we have to be careful not to group them all together (which is one of the things that they tend to do).

People have a right to their opinions, even if we don't like them. Hopefully the election results will reflect when the popular opinion is different to that of the politician.

Too many politicians say one thing and think something different, like for instance most "Family matters" republicans. I would rather hear all the gay-bashers, racists, socialists, libertarians, blankfists, and all other fringe groups speak out before the elections rather than after.

"Got Dat Work" A music video you've got to see to believe.

"Got Dat Work" A music video you've got to see to believe.

Anti-gay, Anti-black Hate Leader Killed by black teen

Google Earth Guys

siftbot says...

Tags for this video have been changed from 'google, earth, employees, chicago, family matters, afghanistan, north korea, 2001' to 'google, earth, employees, chicago, family matters, afghanistan, north korea, Dan Meth' - edited by Sarzy



Send this Article to a Friend



Separate multiple emails with a comma (,); limit 5 recipients






Your email has been sent successfully!

Manage this Video in Your Playlists