search results matching tag: downed trees
» channel: weather
go advanced with your query
Search took 0.001 seconds
Videos (12) | Sift Talk (0) | Blogs (3) | Comments (31) |
Videos (12) | Sift Talk (0) | Blogs (3) | Comments (31) |
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Already signed up?
Log in now.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Remember your password?
Log in now.
Trump Holds Indoor Rally as Wildfires and Pandemic Rage
Trump has blamed State governors for fires on federal land for 3 1/2 years+ but has done nothing to solve the problems on land he controls.
The failure has been in the making longer than that, try since the industrial revolution. I live in a rain forest starting it's third decade of drought. It's a major climate shift. The science is settled, not in question for decades.
No, he needs to listen to the professional forest managers already there instead of ignoring them because he knows more about everything than anyone. See his recent meeting with California's forest managers for examples of his stupidity, his plan is just like for Covid, do nothing, blame others, deny there's a problem, claim it will just go away, blame others again, pat himself on the back for a job perfectly done.
His idea, rake the forests, is just dumb and impossible. Only a complete moron believes you can rake up 33 million acres of mountainous forests, including removing all forest litter which is necessary habitat for many forest creatures and downed trees like redwoods that are useless as lumber. Only a stupid ignoramus believes that's a solution.
Let's say it costs about $1000 per acre, a vast underestimation, that's an extra $330 billion per year for raking California's forests alone. Is Trump offering to fund that, or is he cutting funding instead? (Hint, he cut funding)
Much of the mismanagement is from fighting fires. For decades the plan was don't let any fire burn, that's left forests with 2-5 times the fuel it would naturally have. The last decade that's been realised and when possible fires are allowed to burn. It's too little too late.
Trump's idea of draining the swamp has been plugging the outlets and pumping millions of gallons of sewage into it. That means removing career civil servants and selling positions to friends and contributors with no experience and massive conflicts of interests. Trump's is the most criminal administration ever, with more convictions than any other including Nixon. Politics are incredibly more swampy than before Trump, and the state of the union is crumbling and poised to dissolve into another civil war.
🤦♂️
Trump been in office 3+ years
This failure has been long in the making 30+ years.
Sound like he need to fire land management team and put in place some people who know what to do. More swamp draining?
C-note
(Member Profile)
Your video, Little Girl Punches Down Tree ..., has made it into the Top 15 New Videos listing. Congratulations on your achievement. For your contribution you have been awarded 1 Power Point.
Felling a storm damaged Tulip Poplar with a crosscut saw
I'm so confused as to why cutting down a tree is worthy of a video or my time to watch it. Am I just too Canadian? Do I find this strange because I grew up in a logging town, or because I've cut down trees like this just for firewood?
Any way you look at it, it has wasted time in my life I'll never get back.
Honest Government Ad | We're Fucked
Sure.
For newts, it's everything.
Leaf litter, twigs and branches, and downed trees are all imperative for a healthy forest....as is periodic fire in most cases. They are habitat for most forest animals.
They also moderate soil humidity, keeping it from drying out to dust, and return nutrients to the soil for plants to utilize.
Few forests could survive being raked clean, none would remain healthy.
Thank you newt. Can you dwell a little on the importance of the ecosystem of the forest floor also?
Brian Cox refutes claims of climate change denier on Q&A
Global warming is not man made. End of story.
Only politicians who want to TAX more believe in it. Take the $ out of it and then see how quickly this issue goes away.
And lets say you are right. From the current "facts" we are doomed. So who the F cares. Eat cows and cut down trees and get on with life.
If you read my other reply two posts up, it's clear that I'm not left leaning.
Your linked slaughter statistics are for the USA alone, and as far as I know GLOBAL warming affects the whole globe....so we should count the global amount of farmed animals.
Your statistics also only count slaughtered animals, and not farmed animals like dairy cows, which there are more of at any one time. Around 9 billion dairy cows in the USA. So already in the US alone we have 13.9 billion farmed animals(4.9b slaughtered + 9b dairy cows). It's not hard to see worldwide that figure reaching 50 billion.
And that's still not counting a bunch of animals (read the small print of your link).
The thing with methane too, it traps over 29 times more heat that co2....and most trees don't absorb methane. So even if we had enough trees to absorb co2 (which we don't) then all of methane from farmed animals would remain up there anyway.
80% of tree's aren't gone, 80 % of forests are gone:
https://www.google.com.au/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&ion=1&espv=2&ie=UTF-8#q=how%20much%20of%20the%20world%27s%20forests%20have%20been%20destroyed
How much renewable energy tax do you pay BTW? Where I live I pay $0. But the government does give some $4 billion of our tax money to the coal industry. So if anything the big tax scheme is from non-renewable.
EDIT:
Oh I forgot the most important bit. Scientists can tell between natural co2 and man-made co2. They have differing amounts of carbon. So it's actually really easy to tell between how much carbon dioxide humans have put into the atmosphere vs naturally occurring carbon dioxide.
Also lions and bears are going to live in nature regardless of human activity - we've added 50 billion large, methane producing animals to the world that wouldn't be there otherwise. Granted the destruction of habitats might have reduced the lion and bear populations, but not by 50 billion. Perhaps a few million at most.
Air Quality: A Tale of Three Cities
I hope no one in Atlanta gets the bright idea, "hey lets cut down trees!"
kulpims
(Member Profile)
You have been awarded 1 Power Point for fixing the embed code for Dead Pool video Flocking birds almost bring down tree. Thank you for helping maintain VideoSift's reliability.
mintbbb
(Member Profile)
Your video, Dog Helps Firefighters to Pull Down Tree, has made it into the Top 15 New Videos listing. Congratulations on your achievement. For your contribution you have been awarded 1 Power Point.
Loud off-roader is awesome
Its great!
For sawing down trees. For speed and actual ability to move, take a horse.
Chopped Down Tree Fail
>> ^deathcow:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4e616/4e6168092881973dc9f8b4c3815cbfd2895bd676" alt=""
When I was in 5th grade, I threw about 24 fluid ounces of gas on a beehive once thinking that looked about proper amount to burn something small. The flames were about 20 feet high.
No video/pictures?
QI - How to reduce your ecological footprint
This is the stupidest thing I've ever heard.
Carbon Footprint is the absofuckingly-stupidest thing that ever entered into popular culture.
It's as stupid as trying to walk outside without casting a shadow or breathing without creating CO2. It's the next evolution of stupid right after Political-correctness.
It's one more thing to keep the public at large grumbling in panic about and trying to fix something that isn't broken. It's a witch-hunt of sorts where people go looking for something that is in everything and getting mad at everyone who is doing it.
If "the powers that be" were really concerned, they would stop sucking the oil out of the ground and stop cutting down the rain forests. The two biggest impacting habits of the biggest businesses in the world. No one has any idea of the impact to the planet the actual removal of oil causes but we sure know what happens as it is used or misused. Cutting down trees in mass numbers, the things that create Oxygen, the number one thing we need to live is so beyond idiotic I can't articulate my angst.
Then they come along and say, oh, your breathing is causing CO2 - we should have a breathing tax. Your dog eats food, Oh My Good, the canine is destroying the planet.
*breaths
--ends rant... moves on...
MONSTERS
The production budget was reportedly just US$15,000.
So I guess it's become super-cool to say your production budget was tiny now - but that number is just dumb.
You can't make this film on $15,000 actual dollars. How much time went into it? What's that time worth at even half industry rates (for things like editing, CGI, sound work)? Heck, what's it worth at minimum wage? The only way you get the number that low is you get people to delay their pay (ie. you have a percentage later), and you creatively exclude other expenses so that your budget looks smaller coming in (I already had the laptop and camera! We were going on holiday to Mexico anyways!).
I'm happy to hear a film is low budget - low budget movies that make it to me are usually pretty good (thinking of Primer here). But this ridiculous "how long can we go" contest is silly and disingenuous.
If I build a house by chewing down trees and shaping them with my teeth, I don't have a free house - literal dollars parted with aren't the only costs that exist. Similarly, these people don't have a $15,000 movie - and I suspect that they literally spent more than $15,000 as well.
QI - The Miracle of the Herrings
and all this time i thought herrings were only good for cutting down trees
John Cleese about the difference between football and soccer
@NetRunner, @gwiz665, especially @entr0py.
Everybody knows we should be using kelvins!!! You don't even need the °!
Why would you cut down trees to make tables when you have perfectly good Ks to measure temperature with?!?
EVE Online - Dominion fleet battle trailer
Eve is the closest thing I've ever seen to what I think a MMORPG should be.
If I'm going to play an MMORPG, I want it to be like another life in another reality. The fancy slot-machines that are WOW, LOTRO, GW, WAR, etc do not interest me. Grinding for XP doesn't interest me. Gold farming doesn't interest me. Predetermined plots don't interest me.
Give me a virtual world and let me discover it as I go.
In-game rules and laws should be enforced in-game; If I go on a killing spree, I expect in-game law enforcement (preferably made up of other players) to hunt me down, not to find my account suspended the next day.
I expect deaths to be rare but permanent.
I expect the game mechanics to be kept secret; Numbers don't float off of real people when hit.
I expect to be able to affect the environment directly: Cutting down trees; building houses, weapons, tools; damming rivers; mining raw materials.
I expect the developers to be scripting/triggering new events to make the world feel alive: Have a volcano erupt or a river flood. Start a forest fire that threatens homes. Drop off a van-load of Jehovah's Witnesses in my village.
I expect the players to be left to govern themselves in whatever way they determine is best.
I expect the players to be free from developer-imposed responsibilities. If I want to spend all my game time painting buildings pink, the game ought to let me do that (to whatever extent the other players tolerate it). I shouldn't be forced into any role by the programming.