At 4 seconds, not if you count "Who's Knocking on the Wall" from Apollo 18, but it, along with the other short tracks on that album weren't intended as songs per se.

"The liner notes, in reference to these tracks, include the message "the indexing of this disc is designed to complement the Shuffle Mode of modern CD players". According to John Flansburgh, listening to the album on shuffle made a collage of songs, with the short fingertips interspersed among tracks of regular length.

- wiki

I think that is rather optimistic. Phones are going to be around for quite a while.
Google are a long way from bringing a finished product to market and when they do it will also try to complement Android.

thanks for the complement @AmenRobEke

Racist or not, Sadly, It's true that Whitney was a whore to the drugs. Unfortunate for all of us to have lost such a talented singer. However, I believe even Dolly commended Whitney on the amazing rendition of her song. Dolly herself is very talented but I'm sure she never begrudged Whitney for the complement of performing her song.

>> ^shang:

>> ^Yogi:
>> ^shang:
Nice cover of Dolly Parton's I will always love you...
I don't recognize crack whore houston.. it's Dolly's song and always will be this girl in video owns it.

What a clever way to reveal that you're a racist.


How did you get to that conclusion?
Bobby Brown/Whitney Houston are equivalent of white trash if you want to get racial with it, I didn't
Houston killed herself and Bobby helped her 2 drug addicted trash, stuck on crack up to her own death she was on drugs.
She was spending 6 grand per week on crack and other drugs.
she deserves no accolades and plus saying houston did a cover of Dolly Parton is not racist.
Dolly Parton wrote the song and sung it years before Whitney begged to Dolly to sing it.
and everytime Whitney's version sold she had to pay royalty to Dolly.
it's not racism it's truth, go ahead and defend a crack whore if ya want, but calling someone a crack whore is not racism. And for your own information I am black.

It looked like it hit him mid-thigh. And no, it's not a complement.

>> ^deathcow:

How can three dudes make such a force, such a wall of music. Everyone is just awesome I feel stupid complementing any of them individually.... but,... Peart omg


Peart is GOD!

How can three dudes make such a force, such a wall of music. Everyone is just awesome I feel stupid complementing any of them individually.... but,... Peart omg

I'm only watching these virals now, as they contain footage not in the film. They complement it.>> ^spoco2:

I'm just here to say I'm avoiding watching this, I've already seen way too much of this film thanks to the trailers.
I long for the days when trailers gave away almost nothing of the film.

I was disappointed at the end (no sarcasm), but only because it was well spoken throughout and the music complemented the speak patterns

they complimented that they were all good, and they commented that each member complemented others' flaws. as a group, the judges mentioned they are ready for the real world (JYP joked that he will send them out to the London olympics if there's a singing competition) but because the competition is on an individual basis, JYP said the girls will need to be eventually separated. thats why they looked sad at the end.

3 of the made the top 10.

2 of them are still in the top 9, and it's an ongoing competition.

I was having dinner with a few European colleagues in London a while ago. One of them told me a story of how he was in the States, in the south, and was complementing his american colleagues on the bad guys we had rounded up.

He said, "You got Bin Ladin, you got Quaddafi, you got the pirates....who's next?"

Without missing a beat, the two Americans said,"Obama!" He was of course shocked.

The other diners asked, with jaws gaping, "Do...do you feel this way?"

"Of course not," I said, and gave them a cliff notes version of the American South.

---------------

Shows there is a chasm of perception between the states and Europe.

@Pantalones

The subject of rights is vast, and as old as the Greeks. The most relevant thinkers that directly tie to this line of questioning are Thomas Hobbes, and John Locke. Hobbs rejected the idea of Natural rights and divine orders, where Locke embraced it. Like Hobbs, I reject the idea of Natural, Divine rights, yet still embrace the idea of a social contract replacing natural rights with rationally negotiated rights.

Your counter argument is at the heart of what Positive and Negative rights are: I personally believe that only negative rights can be enforced; your right not to have something happen, where as others suggests that only positive rights can be asserted; your right too something. Wiki has a good read on it here.

I posted a video awhile back that wasn't very highly regarded because the guy is a little arrogant to start off, but the video really starts to get awesome deeper in if you can get past some of the arrogance to start. http://videosift.com/video/Tom-Woods-Where-Do-Rights-Come-From

So much to learn, so little time. Myself, I am still tasked by @NetRunner to read John Stuart Mill's book, but I suspect my rejection of natural rights/utility won't bold to well for me there. Go forth fellow truth seeker and find all the truths that I missed

O ya, and always consult the wiki on natural rights and social contracts, that will point you in so many directions and give you such a complement of names as to be lost for years in completely conflicting ways to view the world!

>> ^Smugglarn:

I must go to this steak house where they serve bottles of win.
Great indeed.
Indeed, there's nothing like a nice bottle of win to complement a good steak

>> ^Deano:


The thing is no publisher is ever going to market a game that just has multiplayer, even if for many dedicated fans that is what the game is really about.

Really? Ok, off the top of my head and just FPS's...
TF2, BF 1942, Tribes, Monday Night Combat, Left 4 Dead, Quake 3, Counter Strike.
Do I need to go on?

I remember first year of art school where we had to unlearn all we thought we knew about colour and relearn about the nuances in colours that we were never exposed to as a non-artist.

There are the hues
Primary: red, blue, yellow (white and black)
Secondary: orange, purple, green
Tertiary: red-orange, red-blue, yellow-blue, yellow-green ect.
Or even further - Quad-clours: red-red-blue or yellow-yellow-green

The complements: colours the appear on complete opposite sides of the colour wheel.
red compliments green, yellow complements purple, orange complements blue

And then the variations:

Intensity: Intensity can only be controled by the purity of the pigment being used. You can never increase the intensity of a colour, you can only decrease it by the means of combining it with any other pigment. The reason why artists pay premium prices for pure colours such as cadmium.
Value: colour changes made when mixing with various degrees of complement colours - mixing red with green, yellow with purple, mixing orange with blue.
Shade: colour changes made when mixing with various degrees of white (tints) or black (shades) to a hue. Black creating low values, white creating high values.
Coverage: Opaque vs. transparent/translucent applications

Using this structure, all the colour terms an average person uses now means nothing to me. words such as teal, brown, periwinkle etc.

These colours can now be described using a more precise system which includes a higher degree of variation..
Brown: low-intensity, low-value, red-brown.
Auqa: high-intensity, high-value, blue-green

OK class dismissed... There will be no test on today's lesson

Wouldn't today's tourists find this sort of happening a bonus? Imagine the stories:

a) We saw a bigass statue of Jefferson
b) We saw a bigass statue of Jefferson with a bunch'o weirdos doing a jig around it!

As for the reason behind the jig (which the participants were surely eager to explain), surely it complements Jefferson's ideas about keeping the people free from oppressive abuse of power, no?