search results matching tag: bosses
» channel: weather
go advanced with your query
Search took 0.002 seconds
Videos (648) | Sift Talk (17) | Blogs (96) | Comments (1000) |
Videos (648) | Sift Talk (17) | Blogs (96) | Comments (1000) |
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Already signed up?
Log in now.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Remember your password?
Log in now.
Sea Lion Drags Girl off dock
Yeah, there's a reason they're called sea LIONS and not sea-kittens.
Kudos to the guy that jumped in to rescue her. I was expecting the usual bunch of people standing around freaking out, but this dude just went straight into action like a boss!
Is this Trump's theme song or what?
They play this on TV? Awesome.
It used to be played by the radio station I worked for in the early 90s, until some Americans working in the company noticed, and explained the lyrics to the boss.
Rude Lady Fires a Long Time Janitor For Leaving 8 Min Early
What a disgusting bitch. As if she isn't ugly enough physically, she has to display an even more sickeningly ugly personality publicly.
There's no way she would have paid him overtime for being there 15 min longer, and the fire dept might have fined them if he hadn't given them access, or just left and not inspected, closing the school and definitely costing the janitor his job for not letting them in.
Do they not have a punch clock? That should back him up completely with HR. I can only hope they're addressing Susan's inappropriate behavior and reprimanding her strongly.
He's better off. He'll get another job thanks to this video, a better one with a boss who's not using a pineapple for a butt plug.
I think you are going to be sorry....Mrs Susan Opferman of Alpharetta Georga, for this behavior. Someone's going to be offended and find you and/or use these overhanded, insulting, unfair and dehumanizing tactics against you and your children. I expect Webb Bridge middle school will be getting a large number of complaints about this woman working with children, maybe costing her job. Turn about is fair play...get ready for a shit storm.
A good question I have, why would a custodian's hours end at the same time school gets out? Do they leave the daily messes to dry and harden overnight until 6:30 am? It would make far more sense if he got off at 4.
Edit: oops. I made a mistake. I just realized this is normal and accepted behavior for a beachmaster. Carry on.
Our bosses went away and...
Our bosses went away and... ...before they left, told us to create a video that took advantage of viral marketing!
Stephen Colbert Goes One-On-One With Trump
Hell no.... I'm the boss!
at least until the actual boss comes back
Did you get in trouble?
*politics
eric3579 (Member Profile)
Thanks
I do hope he never comes to regret his decision. Way back when Kerry Packer's helicopter pilot gave up his kidney for his long-time boss, it was pointed out that the risks are actually higher for the donor than the recipient.
That story is worth googling btw, it has far more ups and downs than I expected!
*promote
Trigger Happy Cop Attacks Private Investigator
Interesting to read the jury instructions, especially the requests for admission portion: http://photographyisnotacrime.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/Jury-Instructions-1.pdf
I'm a bit on the fence with this one. I understand the fear, but that deputy seemed completely unable to be rational. And that's a tough thing to be in this situation, but you gotta keep your wits about you...for everyone's sake. I'm kind of surprised he didn't accidentally pull the trigger.
As with most of these issues/interactions, I place a lot of blame on the bosses and elected officials for not forming/maintaining a better dept.
Finally, Sean Spicer's Credibility Being Questioned Openly
Perhaps so, but this has no bearing at all on whether he is credible. If his boss says questionable or inaccurate thing or simply lies, and Mr. Spicer is obligated to support those statements or events, then the topic doesn't matter if he doesn't stick to the facts or communicate them in a credible, logical manner.
Sean Spicer is doing a great job from all the leftest media trying their best to tear down this Republican president.
CrushBug (Member Profile)
Congratulations! Your comment on Vietnamese Tactical Third Floor Infiltration (Like A Boss) has just received enough votes from the community to earn you 1 Power Point. Thank you for your quality contribution to VideoSift.
This achievement has earned you your "Silver Tongue" Level 8 Badge!
Bathroom Signs Have A Message For Donald Trump
Federal protection??? Obama wrote a letter. No LAW no protection of any sort... FAKE NEWS!
The extreme left has become unhinged under Obama. Trump isn't taking any of that shit. BOSS TRUMP.
Donald Trump's newest senior adviser: Locutus of Borg
Trump does not give a rats ass what the media say..He just keeps moving forward.
Boss Trump
Why I Left the Left
"Offended" is different from "harmed". The SJWs need to learn that lesson fast. Harm in this context means put in physical danger of injury, which a stampede or riot would fall under and why you can't incite either.
If one is truly "harmed" by offensive words, that's an extremely odd personal mental problem that should not be inflicted on the rest of us, please just avoid the public and stick with your similarly afflicted group.
Your TV point is good, change the channel or turn it off.
Your college point is terrible, IMO. College is, in large part, intended to expose you to new and differing ideas and mindsets and teach you how to interact with those holding them. Interpersonal communication was a requirement where I went. If that's something people are uncomfortable with, they don't belong in colleges. Period. If someone wants to start a school where those ideals (safe space, regulated speech, trigger warnings, etc) are reinforced, fine, but it shouldn't be accredited because, no matter how good the classes and students are, it's missing a key component.
The boss being offensive, there's a clearly defined legal line, if they cross that line you can sue, if not, grow a pair and realize two of the most important lessons my parents taught me...."life's not fair", and "what you want and what you need are two different things, and knowing which is which can be the road to contentment, while not knowing is always a road to ruin". I feel like a lot of kids today have never heard either.
I agree with all of that, and there definitely are reasonable limits to completely "free" speech -- like the fire in a crowded theater staple example.
"Harm" seems like a good place to start when defining those limits. It works in the "fire in a theater" base case really well; by making that out of bounds you avoid trample / stampede injuries.
But what about "trauma or deep internalized concepts where we might see words leading to genuine harm of an individual", as you suggest? I'd agree that cases like that can exist. But to me, the question then becomes "how easily can you avoid those words?"
Offended / "harmed" (perhaps genuinely) by something you see/hear on TV? Very easily solved -- change the channel. Publish "trigger warnings" recommending like-minded individuals also avoid that channel/program/whatever if you like; people who do not agree can also easily avoid those.
Offended / "harmed" (perhaps genuinely) by something your professor said in a University? A bit harder to avoid. Someone in that situation can drop the class and try to take it with a different professor (which may not be possible), avoid taking the class entirely (although it may be a requirement for graduation), or contemplate moving to a different university (which is likely an uneconomical overreaction).
There are arguably better options available for such a person. I'd encourage them to reflect on the phrase "choose your battles wisely", and decide if this particular "harm" (giving all benefit of the doubt that it does actually exist) is worth escalating.
Offended / "harmed" by something your boss says at work? "Choose your battles" still applies, but perhaps also consider asking people who have had a job and who have had to work for a living for advice. When (trigger warning) 99.9% of them say something like "welcome to the real world", maybe -- just maybe -- it is time to look within and re-evaluate your own offense / "harm" threshold.
Why I Left the Left
I agree with all of that, and there definitely are reasonable limits to completely "free" speech -- like the fire in a crowded theater staple example.
"Harm" seems like a good place to start when defining those limits. It works in the "fire in a theater" base case really well; by making that out of bounds you avoid trample / stampede injuries.
But what about "trauma or deep internalized concepts where we might see words leading to genuine harm of an individual", as you suggest? I'd agree that cases like that can exist. But to me, the question then becomes "how easily can you avoid those words?"
Offended / "harmed" (perhaps genuinely) by something you see/hear on TV? Very easily solved -- change the channel. Publish "trigger warnings" recommending like-minded individuals also avoid that channel/program/whatever if you like; people who do not agree can also easily avoid those.
Offended / "harmed" (perhaps genuinely) by something your professor said in a University? A bit harder to avoid. Someone in that situation can drop the class and try to take it with a different professor (which may not be possible), avoid taking the class entirely (although it may be a requirement for graduation), or contemplate moving to a different university (which is likely an uneconomical overreaction).
There are arguably better options available for such a person. I'd encourage them to reflect on the phrase "choose your battles wisely", and decide if this particular "harm" (giving all benefit of the doubt that it does actually exist) is worth escalating.
Offended / "harmed" by something your boss says at work? "Choose your battles" still applies, but perhaps also consider asking people who have had a job and who have had to work for a living for advice. When (trigger warning) 99.9% of them say something like "welcome to the real world", maybe -- just maybe -- it is time to look within and re-evaluate your own offense / "harm" threshold.
There are some valid points here, but I think there are multiple interpretations to these issues and it's not so clear cut.
...{snip}
It's a difficult concept to define what is an act of harm. In general this is highly related to concepts of political correctness and has it's very roots in classical liberal thought. In my understanding, Mill would say not to restrict free speech in the case offense only in the case of harm. However, psychology and neuroscience make this line less distinct in caseses of trama or deep internalized concepts where we might see words leading to genuine harm of an individual, not just offense.
{snip}
Student / Teacher debate on Gender Wage Gap
When the student is so misinformed, there's nothing to compliment. This appears to be a debate class, so not capitulating is a requirement.
Women who work don't work only 75% as much as men, they actually tend to not take sick days or vacations at the same rate as men so often work more, and are paid around $.75 for the same work men are paid $1 for. They are also more likely to be offered only 35-39 hours a week, not because they want it that way but to screw them out of benefits.
For example, my wife heads her department. She hired an untrained subordinate, and he was hired at the same hourly pay rate she was earning, even though she was his boss with 10+ years superiority. Her next hire was a woman who had some experience, and was hired at $4 an hour less and does a better job. She does not have a say in their pay rates.
It's been the same everywhere she's worked.
I think that guy might be a high sloop, but he's not quite a schooner, high or otherwise.
It was good to see high schooners debate this. Most kids would seem to back down from the authority of a Teacher.
To sum this up On average Woman work 25%less and make 25%less than men.
Donald Trump will never be President of the United States
Ukraine was a NATO arrangement. That is a tough one. Probably not directly attack but use UN sanctions.
Syria line in the sand issue... If Trump was president at the time I think he would have acted in some sort.
Today Syria with Russia on its side. Hornets nest. But It wold be Boss to fly daily humanitarian flights and tell Syria / Russia not F with these flights or else ...
I actually agree with these two, and I was quite disappointed about both, but do you honestly believe Trump will stand up to Putin in similar circumstances?