>> ^Irishman:
All religion is fail.


Myself being a man of faith I am against homosexuality, however, I am 100% for gay marriage. It is important to distinguish (although, not separate) my loyalties. I am a Christian and also an American.

So if I may fix your quote, "All stupid, clinging-to-Sunday-school-theology, religious people are fail"

>> ^yonderboy:
>> ^vairetube:
I'll never tell another person what they can do as long as they are not harming others physically. Period.

And the quick, correct response to that is "So it's okay to have sex w/ animals and furniture?"
That kind of blanket statement is dangerous.
Did anyone else here wish that Savage had said in his parting words "I think it's appropriate that the Mormon is the one who brought up the topic of bigomy"? (referencing the 3 dads, 3 moms statement)


Sex with animals is animal abuse. Sex with furniture is perfectly fine.

>> ^vairetube:
I'll never tell another person what they can do as long as they are not harming others physically. Period.


And the quick, correct response to that is "So it's okay to have sex w/ animals and furniture?"

That kind of blanket statement is dangerous.

Did anyone else here wish that Savage had said in his parting words "I think it's appropriate that the Mormon is the one who brought up the topic of bigomy"? (referencing the 3 dads, 3 moms statement)

Why didn't he just ask why you must have children then to stay married?

I would have asked Tony Perkins, ok when is the amendment coming to make sure it that Marriage is intended to raise children with one man and one woman. If you are not intending to have children, you shouldn't be allowed to marry.

Why not point to when mixed couples were not allowed to marry? That is one man and one woman, but the majority ruled against that for decades.