http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/09/us/politics/pro-gingrich-pac-plans-tv-ads-against-romney.html?_r=1&hp


Article about this whole thing....

Excerpt:

The film’s producer, Barry Bennett, a former consultant to a super PAC that supports Gov. Rick Perry of Texas, said he came up with the idea himself.

Mr. Bennett said he had bought an “opposition research book” on Mr. Romney compiled by the staff of a Republican rival during the 2008 campaign and had found its contents “stunning.”

“David Axelrod,” he said, referring to Mr. Obama’s strategist, “is going to have a heyday with this, and Republicans need to know this story before we nominate this guy.”

>> ^EvilDeathBee:

This shit is terrifying. How the can these lunatics be in any position to lead ANY country, let alone the USA? How does it get to this? American, you need to cull your inbred, bible bashing, ultra-conservative, voting rednecks


What country are you from? I'm just asking, because our inbred, bible-thumping, ultra-conservative voting rednecks wanna make sure you get invaded for not showing them the respect they think they deserve.

Yes, Rick Perry, when the election is over, you will get a cabinet position in the Department of Rabbit Tending. Look over there, I can see the rabbits now!.....

>> ^Grimm:

"literally at the speed of light" Literally?


No wonder he's worried about Iran! Though to be honest, if the Iranese have that kind of technology, I'm not sure what he thinks the USA can do.

What's wrong with Huntsman? And I would argue that Santorum is at least as religious as Bachmann.>> ^bobknight33:

The Grand Old Party aka the Republican Party
Rick Perry -- Once Democrat - Turncoat
Newt Gingrich -- Left leaning with way to much baggage
Mitt Romney -- Romneycare- Left leaning
Ron Paul -- Stickler for the Constitution- even to a fault (Foreign Affairs)doesn't waiver,
Rick Santorum -- Good,Conservative but needs to place well in Iowa
John Huntsman -- The Foreign Affairs Champ of the bunch -
Michele Bachmann -- Like Ron Paul but carries too much religious Baggage
As a conservative it appears the Paul and Santorum are the best choice.

The Grand Old Party aka the Republican Party

Rick Perry -- Once Democrat - Turncoat
Newt Gingrich -- Left leaning with way to much baggage
Mitt Romney -- Romneycare- Left leaning
Ron Paul -- Stickler for the Constitution- even to a fault (Foreign Affairs)doesn't waiver,
Rick Santorum -- Good,Conservative but needs to place well in Iowa
John Huntsman -- The Foreign Affairs Champ of the bunch -
Michele Bachmann -- Like Ron Paul but carries too much religious Baggage

As a conservative it appears the Paul and Santorum are the best choice.

How is Rick Perrys strong video not included?

You have been awarded 1 Power Point for fixing the embed code for Dead Pool video Rick Perry's response to social dilemmas: cry to Jesus!. Thank you for helping maintain VideoSift's reliability.

Congratulations! Your comment has just received enough votes from the community to earn you 1 Power Point. Thank you for your quality contribution to VideoSift.

>> ^ToastyBuffoon:

I wanna poo in space.


Please, we've got enough crap in orbit as it is.

Congratulations! Your comment has just received enough votes from the community to earn you 1 Power Point. Thank you for your quality contribution to VideoSift.

This achievement has earned you your "Silver Tongue" Level 23 Badge!

The only mention that can be construed as Jesus speaking against gays is Mathew 19:4-6:

“Haven’t you read,” he replied, “that at the beginning the Creator ‘made them male and female,’[a] and said, ‘For this reason a man will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife, and the two will become one flesh’[b]? So they are no longer two, but one flesh. Therefore what God has joined together, let no one separate.”

However, if you read the "context" (since you dummies love to pull the context card out), the question he is answering is:

Some Pharisees came to him to test him. They asked, “Is it lawful for a man to divorce his wife for any and every reason?”

So pretty much the ONLY mention of a man and a woman is an exclusive mention of not getting a divorce

All of this is for naught, however, since the first amendment to the constitution, states:

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

Pretty amazing, huh? How not only does the constitution (apparently written and signed by "Christians") doesn't mention any "god" whatsoever, but they make sure in an amendment, that the government does not support any single religion. This means that, sin or not, the government has no business enforcing any law on the basis of religion.

game. set. match.
>> ^shinyblurry:

Because Christians do not follow jewish civil or cermonial law.
>> ^hpqp:
Orly? How come I never see your righteous rants under videos about eating seafood? (Lev. 11:10-12) >> ^shinyblurry:
We're commanded by God to speak out against sin and we aren't going to stop obeying God to listen to the politically correct establishment.

if you pay me a million dollars I'll make sure that happens for you.>> ^ToastyBuffoon:

I wanna poo in space.

Oh Rick Perry. When will these republicans learn that they can't win an election just by appealing to their space shittin base. And aren't we fighting enough Chickens already Rick, and you want to fight another one?