That's a silly conspiracy. Like the Bible Code or Nostradamus' quatrains or Glenn Beck's sanity. GET A GRIP, MAN! They're watching us. I have the tin foil for our hats.
>> ^bleedmegood:

espstein spelled backwards is nietspse....brian has 5 letters in it....move 5 spaces to the left on an alphebetic continuum and you get idzonknz....an anagram of epstein idzonknz is 'END ZEN ZIP IS KNOT'....END ZEN ZIP IS KNOT???!?!? Wake up sheeple! End zen zip is knot expressed in morse code is clearly - _- _-- A __-- - _- A __-- -- -__- A -- --- A _-_ _- ___ _ ....now tanslate that into binary and you get
0010110100100000010111110010110
1001000000101111100101101001011
0100100000010000010010000001011
1110101111100101101001011010010
0000001011010010000001011111001
0110100100000010000010010000001
0111110101111100101101001011010
0100000001011010010110100100000
0010110101011111010111110010110 <---(right there. the rosicrucian 'all seeing eye') 1001000000100000100100000001011
0100101101001000000010110100101
1010010110100100000010000010010
0000010111110010110101011111001
0000001011111001011010010000001
0111110101111101011111001000000
1011111

espstein spelled backwards is nietspse....brian has 5 letters in it....move 5 spaces to the left on an alphebetic continuum and you get idzonknz....an anagram of epstein idzonknz is 'END ZEN ZIP IS KNOT'....END ZEN ZIP IS KNOT???!?!? Wake up sheeple! End zen zip is knot expressed in morse code is clearly - _- _-- A __-- - _- A __-- -- -__- A -- --- A _-_ _- ___ _ ....now tanslate that into binary and you get

0010110100100000010111110010110
1001000000101111100101101001011
0100100000010000010010000001011
1110101111100101101001011010010
0000001011010010000001011111001
0110100100000010000010010000001
0111110101111100101101001011010
0100000001011010010110100100000
0010110101011111010111110010110 <---(right there. the rosicrucian 'all seeing eye') 1001000000100000100100000001011
0100101101001000000010110100101
1010010110100100000010000010010
0000010111110010110101011111001
0000001011111001011010010000001
0111110101111101011111001000000
1011111

>> ^gwiz665:

Isn't that Q if my memory serves? Q in any shape or form is awesome - but mostly when it's John DeLancie's Q.


yes but this is another Q from the continuum.

How are they holding both events at the same place and the same time? Won't that cause some kind of quantum fissure in the space-time continuum?

@Samaelsmith
Yeah. I get that and totally agree.
I just question how much a human is actually in control of her or his mind brain and body at all times.

http://videosift.com/video/You-Are-Your-Brain-Transforming-Criminal-Justice

Like the video says, most of our drives and wants are subconscious.

No need for kid gloves but physiological immaturity [i.e. prefrontal cortex] is a relevant consideration during the Demon-Angel Continuum placement test.

@quantumushroom
On the same note..

Do you really think an impulsive person is thinking "Hey, I might get hurt or have to suffer the negative consequences of my actions later on." ??

No, impulse is present oriented.

They're not thinking about the future.
They are thinking "How can I get what I want now?"

Since in your culture every major dispute can be solved with the presence of a gun.

Solution for quick cash + nintendo ds = Bigger/More Guns.

>> ^Jinx:
If the golfball left the cart at high enough velocity then it would never come back.
but if it left at an even higher velocity, then it might just come back before it left.
Basically, conducting science is always about making sure that you materialise an equal amount of golfballs to the ones you lose...or there will be TERRIBLE consequences for the time space continuum...and thats why this is demonstrated at MIT.


It's when the golf ball is on the tee as WELL as in the hole that fucks me up.

If the golfball left the cart at high enough velocity then it would never come back.

but if it left at an even higher velocity, then it might just come back before it left.

Basically, conducting science is always about making sure that you materialise an equal amount of golfballs to the ones you lose...or there will be TERRIBLE consequences for the time space continuum...and thats why this is demonstrated at MIT.

>> ^conan:

if you use youtube's vuvuzela feature on this one, it will create a recursive singularity that rips apart time space continuum and destroys the universe.


Too bad we can't do it with both YouTube's and http://www.vuvuzela-time.co.uk/videosift.com/ ... That would be sweet!

if you use youtube's vuvuzela feature on this one, it will create a recursive singularity that rips apart time space continuum and destroys the universe.

I was always told if you have to put your hands someone at the hard physical force level (force continuum) you are probably arresting them at that point. Cop should turned her around and cuffed the woman and tossed her into the back of the car.

Here's what I think happened. Officer went to ticket woman for jay walking, woman was pissed about it. Got loud, or threatening, which can be interpreted as simple assault. The rest is on camera.

Police Humor, which you can see Bruce Willis do on Live Free Die Hard, he says something to the fake dispatch about 587s, which means for that movie, naked people. The best code you want to hear is "Uh, Dispatch we got a boatload of 314s. Going to need backup, copy?" Which means, generally, there's a boat load of naked people. 314 is the California penal code for when someone exposes themselves in public, or for public view, generally someone naked in a place they should not be naked at.

Thanks. I thought I was asking the right guy.

In reply to this comment by NordlichReiter:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maryland_State_Police

The Maryland State Police are currently issued a Beretta PX4 Storm, but the officer in the video seems to be carrying something of the Beretta type, but I cannot tell. It definetly does not look like a glock which usually have a square slide.

When he holsters the weapon his thumb appears to come up to hit a decocker, which on a Beretta is on the back of the slide and ambidextrous.

I don't know if its standard protocol to have the hammer in ready position, most pistols are double action. However it does appear that he is placing the gun on safe when he holsters the weapon, he is defiantly doing something.

In this case I don't think he needed to draw his weapon. Some will say that's protocol; I say if the perpetrator was not armed then there was no need to present a weapon. In my mind the situation did not scale on the force continuum to have need for a weapon. Maybe soft physical force; the officer jumped straight to lethal force.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Use_of_force_continuum

In reply to this comment by schmawy:
Heh, thanks Nordy. You seem to know a lot about handgun training, so if I may ask a question? Does he appear to take the safety off with his left hand immediately after drawing the weapon? Is that procedure, or is the decision to saftey off a separate event?

In reply to this comment by NordlichReiter:
>> ^schmawy:

Nope. It's not changing.


TELL EM SERIOUS CAT!
GET 'EM!

The threat of deadly force is the second to last step on the force continuum. A weapon is not a tool of expression.

Use of Force Continuum. In short the weapon was not needed. Soft Physical force seemed to be the only thing necessary to place the biker under arrest. By pulling the weapon the trooper went straight to lethal force, or the threat of lethal force; easier but it changes the dynamic of the situation. Especially when he re-holstered the weapon, that could have prompted the biker to flee because his life was in danger or given the biker enough time to attack once he knew the officers guard was down.

If I would have drawn my weapon the biker would have been given verbal orders, and I would have stayed at a safe distance; until the biker was on the ground in face down position. One thing that bothers me most about this video, is that he was well within 6 feet of the biker without first verifying there were no weapons. If the biker was inclined to attack with a concealed blade then the officer would be in a dire situation, and probably maimed or worse.

That's why the trooper in the cruiser, thanks burdy, is a good distance from the bike and approaching from the rear. Now, that is protocol what the plain clothes cop did was not, protocol.

I have training in the subject below; Continuum of Force which they give to all security and law enforcement officers. Presenting a weapon is always, a last resort. No matter the situation.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Use_of_force_continuum

1. Physical Presence
2. Soft Hands
3. Mace or Pepper Spray
(A K-9 unit would fall here)
4. Hard Hands
5. Police Baton, etc.
6. Threat of Deadly Force
7. Deadly Force

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maryland_State_Police

The Maryland State Police are currently issued a Beretta PX4 Storm, but the officer in the video seems to be carrying something of the Beretta type, but I cannot tell. It definitely does not look like a glock which usually have a square slide.

When he holsters the weapon his thumb appears to come up to hit a decocker, which on a Beretta is on the back of the slide and ambidextrous.

I don't know if its standard protocol to have the hammer in ready position, most pistols are double action. However it does appear that he is placing the gun on safe when he holsters the weapon, he is definitely doing something.

In this case I don't think he needed to draw his weapon. Some will say that's protocol; I say if the perpetrator was not armed then there was no need to present a weapon. In my mind the situation did not scale on the force continuum to have need for a weapon. Maybe soft physical force; the officer jumped straight to lethal force.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Use_of_force_continuum

In reply to this comment by schmawy:
Heh, thanks Nordy. You seem to know a lot about handgun training, so if I may ask a question? Does he appear to take the safety off with his left hand immediately after drawing the weapon? Is that procedure, or is the decision to saftey off a separate event?

In reply to this comment by NordlichReiter:
>> ^schmawy:

Nope. It's not changing.


TELL EM SERIOUS CAT!
GET 'EM!

^ Gender is not binary but a continuum between male and female extremes in which the majority of humans clearly fall on one side or the other. All behavior is influenced by genetics and environment.