They'll deploy it into your bio-system via a convenient rectal sandwich delivery port.>> ^deathcow:

can you still get a cold sandwich for $7, do they still have to walk it to you, or will it be "whisked on an underseat conveyor directly to your seat which also cooks the meal and chills the drink before it arrives at your seat"

Noodle in your bio! You're awesome!

>> ^rottenseed:

Chasing Amy??? (Joey Lauren Adams)


Ugh, can't stand her voice. Especially in that movie because she has so many lines.

This chick, on the other hand... I got nothing. No words... should've sent...a... cat.

Thank you for the change. I will look at channels closer now.>> ^eric3579:

>> ^GDGD:
viral and I want to do lies or parody, but..

Not viral as defined by the channel.

>> ^GDGD:

viral and I want to do lies or parody, but..


Not viral as defined by the channel.

>> ^blankfist:

Trolling.


Indeed - maybe the MBA from Villanova part is truthful, and this is her Youtube viral video ad dollars grab? In which case, good try - but forced meme is forced.

>> ^Ryjkyj:

Jesus, I hope that's not really her. According to her bio, she's fifteen. And you know what that makes all of you, right?


More excited?

Fuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu.........

TITLE CHANGE! TITLE CHANGE! >> ^Ryjkyj:

Jesus, I hope that's not really her. According to her bio, she's fifteen. And you know what that makes all of you, right?

Jesus, I hope that's not really her. According to her bio, she's fifteen. And you know what that makes all of you, right?

Ah, I just read your bio. A self described humanist!

You rock, my friend, you rock.

>> ^siftbot:

Invocations (isdupe) cannot be called by GeeSussFreeK because GeeSussFreeK is not privileged - sorry.


Story of my life siftbot. When the evil robot overlords are fully exploring the potential of the human bio-bemusement pods, I will always be able to look back at times like these and remember our special relationship where I was being brutally cast underfoot before it was "cool" or mandated by the robot hive cluster. And for this, I am eternally grateful.

first let me thank both BRM and ryjkyj for reading my novella.very cool of both of you.i kinda put myself out there and you both didnt just outright laugh..i thank you both.
@BRM
i understand.
the reason why i wrote that short novella was to put forth an alternative idea of god,not to push any form of ideology upon you.while it may be an ancient concept,it is not exactly a popular one.the people who attempted to make a community based on that ideology were wiped out.
hopefully it accomplished two things:
1.not every idea of god is based on theology.
2.that i do not pretend to hold secret knowledge,nor am i somehow more special than you due to my faith.
my faith is not based on a book nor a old white dude with a beard who watches from afar judging us all.
my ultimate goal was to paint a picture where those i converse with on the sift could know that i have no religion to offend.i wont take some slight against my ideas as some attack on my god based solely on dogma.
because i adhere to no dogma.

consciousness is one of my favorite discussions and something i have spent a great deal of time thinking about since i was a teen.
what is consciousness?
this is an ongoing question and one i feel is vitally important.we are still learning and the subject fascinates me.
i find this discussion more engrossing and challenging with atheists and other seekers.fundamentalists tend to be quite boring with this subject for obvious reasons.

@Ryjkyj
i was just pointing out the literal translation but i understand why you would reject agnostic in a literal sense.as i stated.it does not really matter,i understand your point and desire for your position to not be confused in any way.
i am totally ok with that.

as for my thesis on god and the edict to "create".
you mention nuclear weapons.
good example.
let me add:murder,torture,domination,genocide.we could go all day.
conversely we could talk about:love,compassion,understanding,forgiveness.
my point was that the creator regards all these as the same,it is WE who deem them "good" or "evil".
that god experiences its own creation subjectively through us..all of us..while we experience gods creation every minute of everyday.
you being aware of this is not necessary because you do it naturally and is one of the main reasons why i would have been burned at the stake (and those that DID postulate this idea centuries ago were executed).religion becomes irrelevant with my scenario.
you are god..god is you and we are all connected.

we understand and relate to the universe through only FIVE sense...thats it..five.
our consciousness interacts with this universe using those senses.with the advent of more and more complicated tools which allow us to perceive the universe in a much more grand scale we have found that the universe keeps getting bigger,richer and far more poetic than any theology could EVER put forth.
evolution has more poetry and beauty then the book of genesis could ever think to muster.
(genesis is actually a metaphorical representation of kabballah)

i love science.
i am not particularly good at say bio-chem or the math of quantum physics (that math is beyond me)but i find each discovery a revelation concerning my faith.
to me science is the slow pulling back of the veil by way of exploration,curiosity and eventual understanding by way of testing physical evidence and/or repeatable,testable results.
these results tend to conflict with religious doctrine but totally coincide with my understanding of a creator.

consciousness is not a closed chapter but something we are still discussing,probing and attempting to understand.so when i use the term to describe god i do so in that light,not with any secret understanding.
so..according to my way of looking at things.if god created the universe from itself it would reside both outside time/space and also WITHIN time/space.
proveable? not a chance...hence=faith
we are talking about a consciousness that is literally the entire universe.a concept that would be hard for anybody to wrap their head around.
i do not pretend to understand this consciousness.how could i?
but i do know i see this consciousness manifesting all around me and it is constant.

i understand that both of you reject this ideology and i am totally ok with that.
in my eyes conversations such as these are more about sharing ideas than being right..or righteous.
my conclusions are my own and they are always changing as more information becomes available.
but i have to say that since i was a teen nothing i have read or learned has changed my position,in fact,it has strengthened it.

thank you both for being so kind and respectful towards my ideas.
i tend to avoid putting things like this out there because i get whacked by both sides..atheists AND religious.
you both have been very kind.
and i thank you.

>> ^raverman:

If i try to pick what makes this uncomfortable...
Skin texture immediately looks like rubber not skin... I actually think this is wasted effort. If it looked like perfectly sculpted shiny chrome i would probably feel more affinity than this weird dead fake human look the researchers keep trying to go for.
also It's missing bio 'micro' movements. I think your subconscious expects to see slight moving, swaying, breathing, etc. Only dead things are perfectly still.


If you look closely at his chest and shoulders it is making a breathing like movement.

If i try to pick what makes this uncomfortable...

Skin texture immediately looks like rubber not skin... I actually think this is wasted effort. If it looked like perfectly sculpted shiny chrome i would probably feel more affinity than this weird dead fake human look the researchers keep trying to go for.

also It's missing bio 'micro' movements. I think your subconscious expects to see slight moving, swaying, breathing, etc. Only dead things are perfectly still.

Huh. I am so sorry, I didn't even hear this.

Seems a bit harsh to ban the whole thing for one phrase. Can I put something in the title or the description to point out that this is offensive and sorry that Bill went there? Would that be sufficient?

[edit] I went back and listened to it again. I can do a shorter version of this and cut out that first "joke".

Do you want to have a conversation about this, or do I just do the edit?

[another edit] Oh. Your bio says "God bless you! I just downvoted your stuff!" This implies a certain.... uber sensitivity? compulsive douchebaggery? it's fun to destroy and troll-ery? Or am I reading too much into it?

I'll wait to see how this plays out....