Not saying he does not have a right to a comment, just saying it was a stupid one. Well within my right also. =)

...but isn't talking about poop and making insults funny?

In reply to this comment by FishBulb:
If you can't think of anything funny to say, make insults and talk about poop.

My impression was that BillO honestly doesn't believe that the USA has been taken over by the psycho neo-cons. He didn't understand the question because he still sees the "liberal conspiracy" as being in control. At least, that was my take. Anyway, arguing about grammar on teh intarwebs about is pretty useless, as we all know. I actually was hoping somebody would take up the mantle of explaining just what the deal was with Clinton and the airstrikes in the Sudan. I could, like, go and find out for myself, but I'm way too lazy for that.

In any case, it is good to remind ourselves once and a while that as good as Clinton seemed by comparison with the current clusterfuck, the atrocities committed by the USA in other countries continued unabated while he was in power.

But that is neither here nor there when dealing with conservative talk radio fox-news Sturmabteilung such as quantumushroom and BillO. I think it would be hilarious if it turned out that BillO actually turned out to be Bill O'Reilly, but I expect that the chances of that are vanishingly small.

In reply to this comment by FishBulb:
I'm sorry you took my post that way. I was trying to point out the hypocrisy of being a grammar Nazi to BillO after he dismissed poor johnald128 for making grammatical errors further up the top of the page. Forgetting to capitalize his name was on purpose. (Please re-read my comments and try and spot the satire). The 'your' instead of 'you're' is a genuine mistake but as I was making the very point you're trying to make to me but to BillO then that kind of makes it a somewhat moot point.

In reply to this comment by djsunkid:
.... FishBulb, don't be a grammar nazi and then make typos of your own. Very poor form. Making fun of BillO for not knowing that he is living in a neocon nightmare world is one thing, but refusing to answer a perfectly valid question about air strikes in the Sudan is very poor form. Not to mention a "your" when you meant "you're", and forgetting to capitalise O'Reilly. Terrible.

It a Germanic base but it doesn't quite look like German. Could be Austrian, Swedish or a swiss-German dialect. I'm not really sure.

In reply to this comment by FishBulb:
Is that German Subtitles?

Skittlebrau!

"Knife goes in, guts come out, that's what Osaka Seafood Concern is all about!"