>> ^xxovercastxx:

Assuming you've got it disabled for privacy concerns, you may have better luck with spoofing.
Something like this: http://www.stardrifter.org/refcontrol/


Yeah, I tried spoofing with PrefBar extension in Mozilla's SeaMonkey v2.0.14:
Send nothing/blank for referrer = blocked
Send a fake non-URL referrer = blocked
Send an invalid/fake URL referrer like http://TrackThis.!!! = not blocked

It is tracking previous web site. Basically, videosift.com and doesn't like it.

Al Jazerra nearly always has a pro-Western spin
Isn't that reaffirming my point in different wording?

2.I claimed You dismiss everything from Al Jazeera as American funded propaganda.

If you think I'm misrepresenting you with that point, surely you can't object if I claim you believe that Al Jazerra nearly always has a pro-Western spin? I don't think my second point is much altered by your rephrasing:

2(v2):You claim Al Jazerra nearly always has a pro-Western spin.

As to point 1, perhaps you want me to reword it as well?

1(v2): You dismiss all claims regarding Syria's current events from the mainstream media and citizen journalists?

You, once again, seem to have reiterated your support of this position with this: Given the circumstances and Assad's short history, I don't buy that he's ordering his army to open fire on civilians. One of the most consistently reported facts from all mainstream media and citizen journalists is Assad's forces killing unarmed peaceful civilians.

Which brings us to number 3,

3(v2): You accept Assad's version of current events within Syria.
You again have reiterated your support of this:
-I don't buy that he's ordering his army to open fire on civilians. This is Assad's story, but EVERYONE outside his regime that anyone has ever spoken to from any media outlet but Assad's own has refuted it.

-There was a story about a month ago or so, where the Syrian army was ambushed in one city and something like 120 army servicemen killed. Did unarmed civilians do that? This is also Assad's story, not verified by anyone outside his regime. The story from refugees and defectors is unanimous as reported by ALL other media, that those 120 soldiers were shot by Assad's secret police for refusing orders to fire upon unarmed protesters.

-The more likely scenario is that foreign agents dressed as Assad's security force are opening fire on civilians. Once again, this explanation isn't being posed by anyone outside Assad's regime. ALL media outlets talking to refugees and defectors are well agreed that the shooters were working on Assad's orders and that foreign agents have NO role in the uprising.

Please, if I've misrepresented what you've said clear things up. I've quoted you extensively and in good context and it is overwhelmingly clear that the story you favor is the one put forward by Assad's regime, in the face of the fact that all other media outlets, Al Jazeera included, and all refugees and defectors unanimously claim otherwise.

Well I was just going through my usual Day to day web sites and Look-EE here what I found !

http://www.cannabisculture.com/v2/content/2011/06/20/Vancouver-Riot-Other-Side-Ugliness

I am tired of these rioter videos personally.

The thumbnail image for this video has been updated - thumbnail added by critical_d.

I see this problem in Mozilla's SeaMonkey v2.0.14 web browsers at home and work too!

The thumbnail image for this video has been updated - thumbnail added by critical_d.

The thumbnail image for this video has been updated - thumbnail added by critical_d.

The thumbnail image for this video has been updated - thumbnail added by critical_d.

The thumbnail image for this video has been updated - thumbnail added by vaporlock.

The thumbnail image for this video has been updated - thumbnail added by vaporlock.

The thumbnail image for this video has been updated - thumbnail added by vaporlock.

>> ^srd:

Indeed, seems to be broken at the moment (at least in FF4) .


It didn't work in my Mozilla's SeaMonkey v2.0.12 and old Firefox v2.0.0.20. IE6 was completely missing. Heh!

http://cannabisculture.com/v2/content/2011/03/07/Marisol-Valles-Garcia-Flees-Mexican-Town-After-Becoming-Police-Chief-Says-Report

So fail. Creationism v2.0

>> ^ant:

In the past, I noticed updating avatar doesn't take an effect right away. Is that a bug or by design? I am using Mozilla's SeaMonkey v2.0.11 web browsers.


That was due to our previous CDN as it took a minute or two to update your newly uploaded avatar. Now, with our new CDN, as soon as you upload your new avatar it will be active.

Issue resolved, so *discard.