So you're saying you think there's a situation in which throwing peanuts at someone and saying "this is how we feed the animals" is acceptable behavior?

Part of why I sorta just view the entire conservative jihad as one giant threat to mankind is this way you guys always rally around people you identify as part of your tribe, no matter what kind of horrible thing they've done.

The only thing you guys condemn your own for is ideological apostasy -- bigotry, corruption, cruelty, even murder doesn't really seem to bother conservatives, at least when it's done by a conservative. But if a conservative says the rich should pay more taxes, or that global warming is real, or that gay people have the right to legally marry -- if they do something like that, then you'll immediately grab your torches and pitchforks and run the guy out of town.

>> ^bobknight33:

You and I don't know why they threw peanuts.

You and I don't know why they threw peanuts. They were not interviewed and given a chance to explain themselves.
Quit jumping to conclusions and making an ass of your self like with CNN and the RNC. I was just asking a valid question.

Too much over reacting by everybody.
>> ^VoodooV:

>> ^bobknight33:
Is the hatred against the camera operator or the leftest media?

oh so it's acceptable to call a fellow human being an animal if they disagree with your political ideology.
no matter how you spin it, it's still unacceptable. So fuck off Bob

I am against police brutality and abuse of power, but one reaction thereto that I cannot stand is when stupid people lump every police officer/agent together as the target of their hate and violence (verbal and sometimes physical), e.g. @shagen454's comment above. In a country like America, for every 1 cop abusing his/her power, 100 are catching murderers, rapists, thieves, making sure your streets are safe, finding your stolen vehicule, giving tourists directions, and generally helping to keep society safe and functional.

There are a lot of things that need changing in our societies, and protest is a valid way of making a point heard, but I have the feeling that some people do it just to have an excuse to taunt authority, puff their chest, or plain ol' break shit and pillage. Especially since, unlike the northern Africa countries a few years ago, the US and the EU are still democratic(-ish) places which allow for a number of legitimate ways to try to effect change.

You deal with a fool every moment you live and breath Bob, that isn't likely to ever change.

>> ^bobknight33:

The scope of the discussion was kids taunting elders. Which would never have happened in the 50's and 60's. Only through liberals spouting personal freedoms incessantly through the decades have lead us to this action shown on the bus.

I was not talking about civil rights but you had to pull up that which was not part of the discussion and bend and twist to somehow justify you position. shameful.
Once again I am dealing with fools.
>> ^Januari:
Ohhhhh what happened?... did your argument completely fizzle out so you decided to change it?... You said LIBERAL... And just TRY to find me a liberal who doesn't condemn that man... while your at it, completely ignore the points made Bob... life was just fucking wonderful back then... damn those liberals...
>> ^bobknight33:
Men in white hoods were from the democrat party. You remember Democrat senator Robert Bird. If the left were so interested in freedom why was he never commended by his party?
>> ^KnivesOut:
Hey bob, maybe google the words "civil rights" before talking about how nice and kind everyone was in the 50's and the 60's.
Those were good, conservative americans that enjoyed the freedom to discriminate and bully other human beings based on differences in appearance.
"Conservative" values still allowed men in white hoods to plant burning crosses on peoples lawns.>> ^bobknight33:
So you are saying that this shit would have happened back in the 50's and 60's when society was more conservative? Sure the kids might have thought the things but would have the proper respect not to say shit.
Once again ignorant fools like you shame this community.

The scope of the discussion was kids taunting elders. Which would never have happened in the 50's and 60's. Only through liberals spouting personal freedoms incessantly through the decades have lead us to this action shown on the bus.


I was not talking about civil rights but you had to pull up that which was not part of the discussion and bend and twist to somehow justify you position. shameful.

Once again I am dealing with fools.

>> ^Januari:

Ohhhhh what happened?... did your argument completely fizzle out so you decided to change it?... You said LIBERAL... And just TRY to find me a liberal who doesn't condemn that man... while your at it, completely ignore the points made Bob... life was just fucking wonderful back then... damn those liberals...
>> ^bobknight33:
Men in white hoods were from the democrat party. You remember Democrat senator Robert Bird. If the left were so interested in freedom why was he never commended by his party?

>> ^KnivesOut:
Hey bob, maybe google the words "civil rights" before talking about how nice and kind everyone was in the 50's and the 60's.
Those were good, conservative americans that enjoyed the freedom to discriminate and bully other human beings based on differences in appearance.
"Conservative" values still allowed men in white hoods to plant burning crosses on peoples lawns.>> ^bobknight33:
So you are saying that this shit would have happened back in the 50's and 60's when society was more conservative? Sure the kids might have thought the things but would have the proper respect not to say shit.
Once again ignorant fools like you shame this community.

Ohhhhh what happened?... did your argument completely fizzle out so you decided to change it?... You said LIBERAL... And just TRY to find me a liberal who doesn't condemn that man... while your at it, completely ignore the points made Bob... life was just fucking wonderful back then... damn those liberals...

>> ^bobknight33:

Men in white hoods were from the democrat party. You remember Democrat senator Robert Bird. If the left were so interested in freedom why was he never commended by his party?

>> ^KnivesOut:
Hey bob, maybe google the words "civil rights" before talking about how nice and kind everyone was in the 50's and the 60's.
Those were good, conservative americans that enjoyed the freedom to discriminate and bully other human beings based on differences in appearance.
"Conservative" values still allowed men in white hoods to plant burning crosses on peoples lawns.>> ^bobknight33:
So you are saying that this shit would have happened back in the 50's and 60's when society was more conservative? Sure the kids might have thought the things but would have the proper respect not to say shit.
Once again ignorant fools like you shame this community.

Men in white hoods were from the democrat party. You remember Democrat senator Robert Bird. If the left were so interested in freedom why was he never commended by his party?



>> ^KnivesOut:

Hey bob, maybe google the words "civil rights" before talking about how nice and kind everyone was in the 50's and the 60's.
Those were good, conservative americans that enjoyed the freedom to discriminate and bully other human beings based on differences in appearance.
"Conservative" values still allowed men in white hoods to plant burning crosses on peoples lawns.>> ^bobknight33:
So you are saying that this shit would have happened back in the 50's and 60's when society was more conservative? Sure the kids might have thought the things but would have the proper respect not to say shit.
Once again ignorant fools like you shame this community.

>> ^bobknight33:

So you are saying that this shit would have happened back in the 50's and 60's when society was more conservative? Sure the kids might have thought the things but would have the proper respect not to say shit.
Once again ignorant fools like you shame this community.
>> ^probie:
>> ^bobknight33:
This is another example of why Liberalism is totally wrong and destructive to society.

bobknight33, what you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.



You just proved to me and everyone else that you belong on that bus with the rest of the children.

Either way, I'm cool with it.
>> ^Yogi:

>> ^gwiz665:
Also, we gotta get 4chan on the case. They'll rape the kids parents and serve them as chili to them. That would be a good day.

Or will just give her...as of now over Half a Million Dollars!

>> ^gwiz665:

Also, we gotta get 4chan on the case. They'll rape the kids parents and serve them as chili to them. That would be a good day.


Or will just give her...as of now over Half a Million Dollars!

Hey bob, maybe google the words "civil rights" before talking about how nice and kind everyone was in the 50's and the 60's.

Those were good, conservative americans that enjoyed the freedom to discriminate and bully other human beings based on differences in appearance.

"Conservative" values still allowed men in white hoods to plant burning crosses on peoples lawns.>> ^bobknight33:

So you are saying that this shit would have happened back in the 50's and 60's when society was more conservative? Sure the kids might have thought the things but would have the proper respect not to say shit.
Once again ignorant fools like you shame this community.

>> ^bobknight33:

So you are saying that this shit would have happened back in the 50's and 60's when society was more conservative? Sure the kids might have thought the things but would have the proper respect not to say shit.
Once again ignorant fools like you shame this community.


Please refrain from name calling bobknight33, you are ironically rehearsing the same typical traits of a bully when you do that.

And as for your arguments, I agree with you that historical context may have conjured a different picture in this situation, but I disagree with your original argument about how a specific government policy is totally wrong and destructive to society. Abuse against outsiders took place throughout US history unrelated to any specific government policy. Children got bullied when they wore glasses, children got bullied when they had funny teeth, children got bullied when their family was poor.

Those old conservative morals held many beliefs that were just as harmful to their society as all the ironies and misguided policies of our contemporary society holds today. Christians bullied other other Christians in the name of loyalty, women were seen as lower class beings, musicians were seen as indecent and cast out from society. In fact bullying was more prevalent and consequences were often much more brutal in those days. Bullying against people of different race often led to physical violence, and even death during the 50s.


If you just focus on children's respect for adults throughout US history, then you could make the argument that liberalism downplayed authority of adults over children. But certainly conservative societies of the 50s weren't any better in terms of bullying. I will reserve the topic of 'changes in social dynamic between adult and children relations in coordination with changes in governmental policies' for you since I think this was actually your specific idea from the beginning.

So you are saying that this shit would have happened back in the 50's and 60's when society was more conservative? Sure the kids might have thought the things but would have the proper respect not to say shit.

Once again ignorant fools like you shame this community.
>> ^probie:

>> ^bobknight33:
This is another example of why Liberalism is totally wrong and destructive to society.

bobknight33, what you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.

So you are saying that this shit would have happened back in the 50's and 60's when society was more conservative? Sure the kids might have thought the things but would have the proper respect not to say shit.

Once again ignorant fools like you shame this community.


>> ^KnivesOut:

LOL when I saw that you were watching the video, I kept reloading the page to see what sort of ridiculous bullshit you would vomit out in the form of a comment.
I was not disappointed.
Actually, I blame conservatives for this, and I have just as little reason or justification as you do.>> ^bobknight33:
This is another example of why Liberalism is totally wrong and destructive to society.