Slow motion replay = *timeshift

I'm sure glad I got a slow-motion replay of a fart. Because I really wanted to watch it again. In slow motion.

of all the videos that actually needed the slow motion replay... bah.

I don't think the slow motion replay was required, but what I wouldn't do for some different angles, especially the gator-cam angle!

A video that was actually MADE by the slow motion replay!

Awesome.

and
"Cool project, but seems like propaganda to me. Why is that a GPU vs. a CPU?"

What it's showing is the difference between serial and parallel computing. Currently the most we have in consumer CPUs (the Central Processing Unit inside your computer), is 4 cores working together. The video card in my pc here...(8800 GTS) has 96 processors, and the latest GTX 280 has, you guessed it, 280 processors... that's SERIOUS parallel processing.

So, this demo is Bang on the money.

And brilliant!

This sounds more like your problem...

Oh, that was a burn.

In reply to this comment by lucky760:
>> ^kronosposeidon:
^Actually chogs, it's 540 height X 451 width

Actually, kp, it's 540 width x 451 height

IMHO, there's too much potential for abuse, both intentional and not. E.g., someone may think a video would be better with a slow motion replay, but the original submitter hates them.

And it sounds too complicated a system to get approval for the replacement. If the submitter is available to approve the replacement, they'd probably also be around to do it themselves if you gave them the embed.

And if an unprivileged member's video was replace with a non-approved host embed, the submitter would no longer be able to edit the post as it would "unapproved host" err.

>> ^kronosposeidon:
^Actually chogs, it's 540 height X 451 width

Actually, kp, it's 540 width x 451 height

IMHO, there's too much potential for abuse, both intentional and not. E.g., someone may think a video would be better with a slow motion replay, but the original submitter hates them.

And it sounds too complicated a system to get approval for the replacement. If the submitter is available to approve the replacement, they'd probably also be around to do it themselves if you gave them the embed.

And if an unprivileged member's video was replace with a non-approved host embed, the submitter would no longer be able to edit the post as it would "unapproved host" err.

I would have -no- problems with someone clocking me across the face with a boxing glove in a controlled environment if I get a slow motion replay out of the deal!

no slow motion replay.... -1

Tags for this video have been changed from 'gravity, lack of, vomit, nasty, slow motion replay, gross' to 'gravity, lack of, vomit, nasty, slow motion replay, gross, airplane, girls, puke' - edited by maatc

This is one of those times that I would prefer three slow motion replays, would save me a lot of repeating.

I, too, am surprised and disappointed that there is no slow-motion replay.

And just now, I imagined a few rapid-fire cuts of the critical half-second and my mind extrapolated it into a 3 minute percussion break.

Tags for this video have been changed from 'gravity, lack of, vomit, nasty, slow motion replay' to 'gravity, lack of, vomit, nasty, slow motion replay, gross' - edited by Fjnbk

Some funny *comedy, especially with the repeated slow motion replays.

Please read the posting guidelines, youdiejoe. This does not belong in the cute channel. *nochannel

id downvote if i could. good video, but i dont thing every single one merited a slow motion replay.