Thanks for the support! I wasnt sure if that was going to explode in my face but I thought I needed to stand up and be counted, so cheers!

In reply to this comment by lampishthing:
Hear hear.>> ^moodonia:

I think this video is bang on the money pointing the larger hypocrisy in all this, and in particular the Dworkin-esque ranting that has been a staple of daytime tv since the 80's.
Recently two sportscasters made off camera sexist comments about the abilities of female referees, they both lost their jobs.
These five fuckwits are breaking their hearts laughing about a gruesome sex attack that almost resulted in murder, I assume they all still have jobs? I'm guessing the show hasnt been cancelled?
I find it very encouraging that people are calling them out on this, about time.
promote

Hear hear.>> ^moodonia:

I think this video is bang on the money pointing the larger hypocrisy in all this, and in particular the Dworkin-esque ranting that has been a staple of daytime tv since the 80's.
Recently two sportscasters made off camera sexist comments about the abilities of female referees, they both lost their jobs.
These five fuckwits are breaking their hearts laughing about a gruesome sex attack that almost resulted in murder, I assume they all still have jobs? I'm guessing the show hasnt been cancelled?
I find it very encouraging that people are calling them out on this, about time.
promote

Cheers!

In reply to this comment by moodonia:
I think this video is bang on the money pointing the larger hypocrisy in all this, and in particular the Dworkin-esque ranting that has been a staple of daytime tv since the 80's.

Recently two sportscasters made off camera sexist comments about the abilities of female referees, they both lost their jobs.

These five fuckwits are breaking their hearts laughing about a gruesome sex attack that almost resulted in murder, I assume they all still have jobs? I'm guessing the show hasnt been cancelled?

I find it very encouraging that people are calling them out on this, about time.

*promote

I think this video is bang on the money pointing the larger hypocrisy in all this, and in particular the Dworkin-esque ranting that has been a staple of daytime tv since the 80's.

Recently two sportscasters made off camera sexist comments about the abilities of female referees, they both lost their jobs.

These five fuckwits are breaking their hearts laughing about a gruesome sex attack that almost resulted in murder, I assume they all still have jobs? I'm guessing the show hasnt been cancelled?

I find it very encouraging that people are calling them out on this, about time.

*promote

He turned me into a newt!

...I got better.>> ^critical_d:

How do you know he is a witch??????????????
>> ^VoodooV:
HE'S A WITCH!!! BURN HIM!

>> ^messenger:

Sure, our boys don't mind lending a hand. And as most of the team is Canadian, that means during the year, the Cup will spend most of its time in Canada, since every player has the privilege of bring it home. The exception, Bourque (a Canadian), was classy enough to bring it to Boston. >> ^bmacs27:
You don't seem to understand. We pay the Canadians, and thus they are OURS. All the semantics in the world won't take away our chalice :-).


I was happy he got a cup and all, but it sucks Roy had to get one too. I always hated that guy. Hasek always seemed like the better goalie to me. It wasn't his fault he spent all those years stuck in Buffalo.

Sure, our boys don't mind lending a hand. And as most of the team is Canadian, that means during the year, the Cup will spend most of its time in Canada, since every player has the privilege of bring it home. The exception, Bourque (a Canadian), was classy enough to bring it to Boston. >> ^bmacs27:
You don't seem to understand. We pay the Canadians, and thus they are OURS. All the semantics in the world won't take away our chalice :-).

>> ^messenger:

Whose Bs stole what?! The Boston Bruins are among the most Canadian teams in the NHL. Only one team, Edmonton, has fewer non-Canadian players (7) than Boston (10). So, congrats on your Canadians overwhelming the other Canadians. I cheer for the team with the most Canadians on it, which, naturally, is the team that's going to win the Cup anyway. >> ^bmacs27:
My B's stole your drinking vessel :-P.


You don't seem to understand. We pay the Canadians, and thus they are OURS. All the semantics in the world won't take away our chalice :-).

My little cousin used to be a forward in a Canadian private school. Now he's a marine in AfPak because he wasn't tough enough.

Whose Bs stole what?! The Boston Bruins are among the most Canadian teams in the NHL. Only one team, Edmonton, has fewer non-Canadian players (7) than Boston (10). So, congrats on your Canadians overwhelming the other Canadians. I cheer for the team with the most Canadians on it, which, naturally, is the team that's going to win the Cup anyway. >> ^bmacs27:

My B's stole your drinking vessel :-P.

My B's stole your drinking vessel :-P.

>> ^messenger:

Bien sûr.>> ^bmacs27:
Canadian I presume? >> ^messenger:
That's a linesman, not a ref. He doesn't have an orange armband.

Bien sûr.>> ^bmacs27:

Canadian I presume? >> ^messenger:
That's a linesman, not a ref. He doesn't have an orange armband.

Congratulations! Your comment has just received enough votes from the community to earn you 1 Power Point. Thank you for your quality contribution to VideoSift.

This achievement has earned you your "Silver Tongue" Level 3 Badge!

Canadian I presume? >> ^messenger:

That's a linesman, not a ref. He doesn't have an orange armband.

How do you know he is a witch??????????????

>> ^VoodooV:

HE'S A WITCH!!! BURN HIM!

>> ^nanrod:

Amazing! 61 upvotes appear out of nowhere, for no reason.
Now for some facts. The man is a linesman not a referee. He is coming to the scene from the blueline on the left of the video which puts him directly in line with Toews (the guy in Red). He is not the referee at the beginning of the vid or the other linesman to the right at the beginning and you can see his helmet approaching from behind Toews at :06. You have to remember how fast hockey is. It takes a linesman less than 2 seconds to skate from his position at the blueline to the net which can seem like he appears out of nowhere. If you video a whole game from this position you could probably edit out 5 or 6 similar scenes.


Was going to point out what @nanrod said. I think he was off camera and was hid discretely by camera movement.