So, Bob….you know who Patricia Kent is? Failed Republican candidate for top election official in Washington County, Utah, a right-wing hate group leader, and a child molesting groomer fired from her middle school teaching job for having sex with and grooming her young girl students.
Blends right in with the rest of you destructive debauched death cultists.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D4Bl1DN_C6w



Can you come up with a list of 10 top Democrats that sexually abused children? How about 10 Democrat candidates? Because you are completely incapable of ever answering questions I’ll answer for you. No, you can’t.

Maybe...depends on their business. If they make other personalised inflammatory cakes, probably. If they make "hey man, nice shot" cakes celebrating cops being shot, definitely.

If they make personalised hate cakes, I would expect them to either pay a large fine for refusing or use the 'special' chocolate icing, and record the person ordering it for public exposure.

Most places have a no vulgarity, no hate speech, no sex rule applied across the board, which is fine....but you must use common definitions for those terms applied equally for everyone.
If "congratulations Pat and Chris" is ok for you if that's Patricia and Christian, you cannot decide it's not ok for Patrick and Christian, or Patricia and Christine, no matter how icky you find it, or how afraid you are that you'll lose control and kiss them.

Simple rule, if the reason for refusal is who the customer is, not what they want you to make, that's unacceptable.

Tags for this video have been changed from 'Tina Fey, Patricia Arquette, Julia Louis Dreyfus, Amy Schumer, Hollywood, Viking' to 'Tina Fey, Patricia Arquette, Julia Louis Dreyfus, Amy Schumer, inside amy schumer' - edited by Grimm

Ya I knew you were going to get hung up on that part but I could honestly care less about what Cenk was saying in this(he's usually an idiot anyway). In fact watch it again and just mute it every time he opens his mouth.

It's what Ana says that's important here she states that the burns on the girl were so bad that even if they did occur outside it still qualifies as neglect on the mothers part and since it hasn't even been hot in New Jersey this time of year it's rather doubtful that burns of that degree occurred from the child being outside.

Like I said there is more to this story that meets the eye. I'm not basing any of my reasoning on how this lady looks it's how she acts and what she says that really disturbs me. And it should disturb you as well.

>> ^Stormsinger:

And Cenk says exactly what you've been implying, "Guilty. I mean look at her, she's a freak." Completely decided the case without a shred of evidence that there even -was- a crime. There was no discussion of whether or not a crime was committed, his judgement was based wholly on her looks.
I don't know how I can say it any clearer...her looks, no matter how awful, don't justify arresting her. And her looks are the only thing any article I've seen has talked about.
>> ^Auger8:
TYT says it better than I can maybe you'll listen to them as there is more to this story than meets the eye.
And btw in the U.S. a person is normally arrested and charged with a crime FIRST, then you are issued a trial to determine your supposed guilt or innocence this is normal not unusual and just because someone is arrested doesn't automatically mean they are guilty.
http://videosift.com/video/Sterilize-Patricia-Krentcil-The-Tanning-M om-TYT
>> ^Stormsinger:
>> ^Auger8:
But let's say your right and she got sunburned while tanning with her Mother outside. Is it any better that she took a 5 yr old to tan outside than it is to tan a 5 yr old in a tanning bed?
Are you fucking serious? You don't see a problem with her being arrested for taking her daughter outside?
Get a grip man! You're descending into idiocy...stop the slide now, and start thinking about what you're saying. You're starting from the decision that she's in the wrong, and now you're flailing around to try and find what it was she did. Rationalizing a prejudgement is a common human behavior, but that doesn't make it a good thing.
I know she looks a mess, but that's hardly reason to presume she's guilty of a crime. And that's precisely what the vast majority of commenters (on other sites, not so much here) are doing. Here, most are just making nasty comments about her looks, and ignoring the fact that she's been arrested apparently without evidence.

And Cenk says exactly what you've been implying, "Guilty. I mean look at her, she's a freak." Completely decided the case without a shred of evidence that there even -was- a crime. There was no discussion of whether or not a crime was committed, his judgement was based wholly on her looks.

I don't know how I can say it any clearer...her looks, no matter how awful, don't justify arresting her. And her looks are the only thing any article I've seen has talked about.

>> ^Auger8:

TYT says it better than I can maybe you'll listen to them as there is more to this story than meets the eye.
And btw in the U.S. a person is normally arrested and charged with a crime FIRST, then you are issued a trial to determine your supposed guilt or innocence this is normal not unusual and just because someone is arrested doesn't automatically mean they are guilty.
http://videosift.com/video/Sterilize-Patricia-Krentcil-The-Tanning-M
om-TYT
>> ^Stormsinger:
>> ^Auger8:
But let's say your right and she got sunburned while tanning with her Mother outside. Is it any better that she took a 5 yr old to tan outside than it is to tan a 5 yr old in a tanning bed?
Are you fucking serious? You don't see a problem with her being arrested for taking her daughter outside?
Get a grip man! You're descending into idiocy...stop the slide now, and start thinking about what you're saying. You're starting from the decision that she's in the wrong, and now you're flailing around to try and find what it was she did. Rationalizing a prejudgement is a common human behavior, but that doesn't make it a good thing.
I know she looks a mess, but that's hardly reason to presume she's guilty of a crime. And that's precisely what the vast majority of commenters (on other sites, not so much here) are doing. Here, most are just making nasty comments about her looks, and ignoring the fact that she's been arrested apparently without evidence.

TYT says it better than I can maybe you'll listen to them as there is more to this story than meets the eye.

And btw in the U.S. a person is normally arrested and charged with a crime FIRST, then you are issued a trial to determine your supposed guilt or innocence this is normal not unusual and just because someone is arrested doesn't automatically mean they are guilty.

http://videosift.com/video/Sterilize-Patricia-Krentcil-The-Tanning-Mom-TYT

>> ^Stormsinger:

>> ^Auger8:
But let's say your right and she got sunburned while tanning with her Mother outside. Is it any better that she took a 5 yr old to tan outside than it is to tan a 5 yr old in a tanning bed?
Are you fucking serious? You don't see a problem with her being arrested for taking her daughter outside?
Get a grip man! You're descending into idiocy...stop the slide now, and start thinking about what you're saying. You're starting from the decision that she's in the wrong, and now you're flailing around to try and find what it was she did. Rationalizing a prejudgement is a common human behavior, but that doesn't make it a good thing.
I know she looks a mess, but that's hardly reason to presume she's guilty of a crime. And that's precisely what the vast majority of commenters (on other sites, not so much here) are doing. Here, most are just making nasty comments about her looks, and ignoring the fact that she's been arrested apparently without evidence.

Ana actually states that it was a voluntary sterilization program sorta like a man getting snipped or a woman having her tubes tied. Sorry can't remember the medical names for those procedures off hand. lol

[edit]A vasectomy or a hisdirectomy(sp?) that's what it is heh I just remembered.

>> ^Boise_Lib:

>> ^Yogi:
Selective sterilization is a step towards eugenics.

They were being hyperbolic.
If anyone seriously tried to set up a forced sterilization program these two would be among the first to scream about it (as would I).

>> ^Yogi:

Selective sterilization is a step towards eugenics.


They were being hyperbolic.
If anyone seriously tried to set up a forced sterilization program these two would be among the first to scream about it (as would I).

That night, his family learned that their bread winner would once again need to seek another job.

"it's ok kids, we'll be fine," he tells is children. "We don't want to go back to uncle Sal and aunt Patricia's house!" they cry.

They didn't want to go back because uncle Sal had touched them sexually on their last visit. Thanks to you, a little boy and a little girl are experiencing things they should never know...

Tags for this video have been changed from 'TED, babies, brains' to 'TED, Patricia Kuhl, babies, language, linguistics, brains' - edited by jonny

Thanks for posting this. I always liked his song "Patricia", he's got a good sound.

>> ^Stormsinger:
Actually, it's not that she's not bright...she appears to be just lazy. Since she -did- manage to work it out after the "easy way" failed.

That's actually the main reason that (most) people are bad at math. They just don't put in the effort to figure it out. That starts at a young age and continues throughout school and adulthood. As math gets harder in school, people get left behind and are convinced it's a confusing subject. It's very straightforward (at least through high school) if you have a grasp of logic and reason and you put in the mental energy to work through problems. I'm sure you've noticed though that a large number of people have no interest in such things.

For some reason I always think of Patricia Piccinini's work when I see these "Love Dolls"...maybe it has something to do with silicone orifices.

http://patriciapiccinini.net/natureslittlehelpers/shows/60Big_Mother/hires/40Big_Mother.JPG

Susan Sarandon's got style. The blonde mother is Patricia Clarkson.

a few things.

- gary oldman played a dwarf and didn't win an award? the film must be hideous.

- what happened to patricia arquette? i used to love her, with all my heart.

- wtf is wrong with matthew mcconaughey? do romcoms pay extremely well or his agent a useless piece of shit?