That's the rub for me....some of these folks gotta have balls, and for some reason they remain silent. This admin's flubs in strategy have seemed brutally moronic to anyone who knows even a smidgen of military history. Commanders in Iraq have a similar mantra...aside from becoming embroiled in someone elses war, there are certain basic actions needed and hands are tied to a degree as to render the military's effect and scope ineffectual at best, and a danger to its own and the program, at worst.

There are two issues for me, that seem much more dire than Iraq....Iran with a dangerous, mentally-ill buffoon at the helm, and N. Korea, with the same in the form of a soul-destroying, egomaniac. The citizens of these countries deserve a chance to become whole, and the simplest method seems to excise the soul-suckers, Chemo-style. Not unlike the Jewish Air Force, surgically removed any threat of Iraq with regard to nuclear threat, on June 3, 1981-Osiraq, which was precision, swift, unilateral, and necessary.


With the same sentiment, this crap in Iraq, if we had truly wanted any swift, lasting result, the theme for the last four years, should have been, unrelenting, surgical air strikes, hammering only areas known as safe haven for the so-called, terroists. But of course, we aren't there really to stop terrorism,.. if you wanted to do that, you would slap the hands of governments providing the raw material....why do that??? War is big money.