search results matching tag: nicaea
» channel: nordic
go advanced with your query
Search took 0.000 seconds
- 1
| Videos (1) | Sift Talk (0) | Blogs (0) | Comments (8) |
- 1
go advanced with your query
Search took 0.000 seconds
| Videos (1) | Sift Talk (0) | Blogs (0) | Comments (8) |
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Already signed up?
Log in now.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Remember your password?
Log in now.
Banned From The Bible
siftbotTags for this video have been changed from 'history channel, christianity, jesus, nicaea, enoch, constantine, new testament' to 'history channel, christianity, jesus, nicaea, enoch, constantine, torah, quran' - edited by xxovercastxx
Banned From The Bible
siftbotTags for this video have been changed from 'history channel, christianity, jesus, nicaea, enoch, constantine' to 'history channel, christianity, jesus, nicaea, enoch, constantine, new testament' - edited by xxovercastxx
Bill Maher ~ Why Liberals Don't Like Bachmann & Palin
hpqp@shinyblurry
Hello my friend, I see the scent of evil godlessness has brought you crusading back with the heavy-handed Truth of the Word! I admire the courageous way you tackle the arguments of three sifters at once, all the while politely avoiding calling @bareboards2, @ChaosEngine and myself by our @tagnames, lest you disturb us to the point that we might be drawn to read your comment and respond.
It is wise of you to remind us that the Bible was written by Christians and not those gnasty gnostics, whoever they may be. The Bible was inspired by God Himself, and only Christians wrote it, including those parts written long before Christianity existed! And don't let the "moderates" talk about compilation, the councils of Nicaea, Rome, Trent, etc. No! God Himself chose which books would be considered canon, not a bunch of pops, popes and romans. And don't let Iranaeus, granddiscipleson of John the Evangelist, tell you that the reason there had to be four gospels - other than for the cool sounding name that is "Tetramorph" - was because
"there are four quarters of the earth in which we live, and four universal winds, while the church is scattered throughout all the world, and the 'pillar and ground' of the church is the gospel and the spirit of life, it is fitting that she should have four pillars breathing out immortality on every side, and vivifying men afresh….Therefore the gospels are in accord with these things…For the living creatures are quadriform and the gospel is quadriform…These things being so, all who destroy the form of the gospel are vain, unlearned, and also audacious; those (I mean) who represent the aspects of the gospel as being either more in number than as aforesaid, or, on the other hand, fewer".
That guy was probably high on burning bush or something.
As for me, I humbly thank you for bringing me back into the realm of honesty about my own life and knowledge. Please continue to spread
yourGod's wisdom and love on the Sift, as you can tell we really need your God's dictatorial stick and carrot (but mostly the stick, i.e. you) to put us on the straight and narrow.yours sincerely,
...@hpqp
p.s.: You are right about the Bible not being misogynist in the least, but you don't go far enough. Here's an example (among many) that you can use next time, showing that in the Bible females actually get preferential treatment, here at the merciful hands of the author of Genesis (Numbers 31:17-18):
Now therefore kill every male among the little ones, and kill every woman that hath known man by lying with him.
But all the women children, that have not known a man by lying with him, keep alive for yourselves.
>> ^shinyblurry:
ramble ramble of course Jeebs is an authoritarian tyrant bla bla evilution is a lie blabbiddity bla bla bla
Banned From The Bible
siftbotTags for this video have been changed from 'history channel, christianity, jesus, nicaea, enoch' to 'history channel, christianity, jesus, nicaea, enoch, constantine' - edited by xxovercastxx
Banned From The Bible
siftbotTags for this video have been changed from 'history channel, christianity, jesus, nicaea, enoch and others' to 'history channel, christianity, jesus, nicaea, enoch' - edited by xxovercastxx
north carolina church planning to burn BIBLES!
sometimesyes, the translation that was penned 1540+ years after the original manuscripts, and 1200 yeas after the council of nicaea voted on which of those manuscripts are the right ones, why yes, that version is the original.
Banned From The Bible
enoch>> ^HadouKen24:
The Biblical canon was not decided at the Council of Nicaea. The canonical list presented there was only a suggestion by a few members, and not voted on. It wasn't until much, much later--the Council of Trent in the 16th century--that the canon was officially settled. The canon was decided not by a vote, and more by the general agreement and consensus of orthodox clergy as what was and was not orthodoxy became settled.
say hello to the KJV
Banned From The Bible
HadouKen24 says...The Biblical canon was not decided at the Council of Nicaea. The canonical list presented there was only a suggestion by a few members, and not voted on. It wasn't until much, much later--the Council of Trent in the 16th century--that the canon was officially settled. The canon was decided not by a vote, and more by the general agreement and consensus of orthodox clergy as what was and was not orthodoxy became settled.