Up-vote 4 the novelty and spectacle of this, "unbelievable masterpiece."

Corridor Digital. Nearly everything they make is a masterpiece.

I bought PP for the first time ever, just so I could *quality this masterpiece! Fucking love you CB!

*quality - This is a masterpiece. You couldn't have scripted it/acted it any better.

How did I miss this masterpiece?

Gotye Puts Together a Cover Song Masterpiece has been added as a related post - related requested by kulpims on that post.

I will never stop loving ELO.

Concerto for a Rainy Day is a fucking masterpiece.

@spoco2 again, it's like comparing youtube to cinema. When was the last time you went and saw a random youtube video and went "This is a masterpiece, far better than what hollywood can produce!" you can't compare the two, THAT is effectively what makes up most of the internet porn, some yokel with a camera, some are good, some are terrible.

There are professional websites, and I'm assuming that they're the exact same thing as YDJ described. But you can't compare the two, it doesn't make sense to even try, again, one is a business, and one is someone who thinks filming themselves is and putting it online is "kinky".

revenge of the sith is a grand masterpiece?
oh fuck you lady.......

We live in an amazing time that "normal" things are really engineering masterpieces.

Not only was your prior argument fallacious, but I refuted it. Now you're ignoring that and cherry picking your replies here. Seems pretty intellectually dishonest to me?

Alright, Ill answer your "refutations" then:

"Why shouldn't you suspect that decay rates could change?"

If you read my post, I explained why : Because there is no evidence that suggest it is changing, and no known physical mechanisms that can produce such change. The moon could suddenly start orbiting the other direction relative to earth tomorrow, but there is no signs, no evidence, that suggests or implies that it will, and also physics dont allow it unless it is pushed or pulled by some very large force etc.
Bottom line, change in the decay rate is an assumption of something for which there is no evidence. Thats why scientists dont waste their time suspecting this.

As for the line "absense of evidence is not evidence of absense". Well thats a poetic thing and all, but its not really true when you think about it for a little bit: for the most part, this is how we exclude things from our reality, and separate what is real or not. It is perfectly consistent to say "I really dont think this thing exist" while remaining, in principle, open minded. There might be green hairy monsters hiding under my bed, I can never know for absolute certain, but I dont THINK so, the absense of evidence convinces me there are none.

The same is true in say, particle physics, there may be thousands of different "higgs-bosons" of different kinds doing all sorts of crazy shit in physics, but again, in the absense of evidence... you cant just build your ideas around fantasies.

Do you know the geologic column doesn't actually exist in reality?
Are you alking about illustrations of the geologic column? Then yeah, I'm aware that it doesnt look like that in real-life, but the term is definately real, and yes, erosion and things like that can expose old layers to fresh air, this is of course well know in biology and geology. When I say fossils are layed down in order, I dont mean that they are all physically on top of eachother, but that the dating of the layers match with the kind of animals found in that era. IE: there are no "fossil rabbits in the pre-cambrian" as one biologist replied when asked what would truly disprove evolution.


Caylor: "Do you believe that the information evolved?"

MB: "George, nobody I know in my profession believes it evolved. It was engineered by genius beyond genius, and such information could not have been written any other way. The paper and ink did not write the book! Knowing what we know, it is ridiculous to think otherwise."

Hahaha, if that was said by an actual molecular biologist capable of finding his own ass, I'll eat my hat. This is so obviously Creo-speak from here on to hell. The first thing an actual biologist would do would be to question the use of the word "information" (I'm assuming he's asking about the information contained in DNA) in this context. Because we refer to DNA as a language and "it contains all the information needed to assemble a human" and so on, Creationists think of DNA as some sort of literary masterpiece, it seems. The truth is of course that its 4 acids spelling 95% repetetive gibberish intersped with some interesting bits that code for proteins and do actual useful stuff.

They also seems to think that (perhaps because they believe it themselves) humans existed from the get-go, and that DNA somehow evolved inside us or some shit like that. (Like one creationist who asked Richard Dawkins how we humans peed before our penises and vaginas evolved..) Anyway, like our penises, our DNA is of course much older than humans themselves, We are simply the latest iterations of a nearly endless line of attemps by nucleic acids to clone themselves by way of making an animal that does the reproduction.

I highly suspect that interview was faked by creationists , but even if it wasnt, it'd just mean that there's a molecular biologist out there who doesnt know fuck all about molecular biology and hold some strange beliefs, and he's wrong. Simple as that.


You then have the obligatory list of quotations, and what can I say?.. I can see how you think these are somehow indicating a plot or something against creationist, but honestly this is just plain quotemining.

>> ^ReverendTed:

It must be great being Patrick Stewart.
He literally cannot be in a bad production. The worst script in the world becomes a masterpiece by his mere participation.
What was that? Nemesis? I'm sorry, I think you're breaking up...


Unfortunately you didn't see the very crappy made for TV movie of "Moby Dick" he stared in (for a bung load of money) ... By an Australian TV company ... I work for an Australian TV Company .. their standards aren't the best.

It must be great being Patrick Stewart.
He literally cannot be in a bad production. The worst script in the world becomes a masterpiece by his mere participation.
What was that? Nemesis? I'm sorry, I think you're breaking up...

Yeah this is pretty much a masterpiece.