search results matching tag: make it better
» channel: nordic
go advanced with your query
Search took 0.008 seconds
Videos (50) | Sift Talk (6) | Blogs (5) | Comments (568) |
Videos (50) | Sift Talk (6) | Blogs (5) | Comments (568) |
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Already signed up?
Log in now.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Remember your password?
Log in now.
Airwolf: Darth Vader and the Empire Intro(duction)
Airwolf theme makes everything better. *quality
Africans started slavery
I don't give a fuck who 'started' slavery. Whoever 'owns' other people is an asshole regardless of who started it. Don't try to make yourself better about it, but saying black people started it. That's just avoiding the problem.
radx
(Member Profile)
Sweet zombie Jesus, that's fucking awful.
They actually said on the record that they think their training makes them better at detecting drugs than a blood test?!? And this bullshit doesn't get tossed every time?
I just hope those 3 all start multi million dollar lawsuits against the force, county, and him personally for violating their civil rights. He needs to be homeless, carless, and pensionless, and that force needs to learn this isn't acceptable.
Astonishing he's getting accolades just for arrest numbers and not convictions. You would think people would know better. We should never give authority an incentive to abuse their authority, and that's exactly what this M.O. is.
Here's one for your collection:
http://www.11alive.com/news/investigations/the-drug-whisperer/437061710
Obamacare in Trump Country
Trump said he will "repeal Obamacare and replace it with something amazing".
These people bought into that. The average sifter (myself included) did not.
However, as someone who wants to see health care improve in the US, I think that a Trump presidency is likely to lead to things getting better (long term). Even if he massively screws up. Actually, sorta especially if he massively screws up.
These people had deductibles in the multiple thousands of dollars range. With a median family income of $16k per year. According to CNN, the premium for the standard package will be $296 per month on average. So for the people in the video, they'd pay about 20-25% of their yearly income on premiums, with another 12-15% out of pocket before they hit their deductible for any needed care. Sure, some insurance is better than no insurance, but these people have been living dangerously with no insurance for a LONG time. Thirty plus percent of your yearly wages vs rolling the dice? A bunch are gonna roll the dice.
So, option A -- a miracle occurs, and Trump actually follows through and replaces Obamacare with something that actually is better. My money isn't on this one, but if he pulls it off more power to him.
Option B -- the people in the video are right, and Trump and the GOP will lose interest in actually repealing the ACA when they realize that they are going to have a hard time actually making something better. I don't think this one is likely either, because I don't think they really give a shit. But you never know. This one would represent a slow stagnation and likely eventual death for the ACA (without any intervention in 2018 or 2020) as more and more people decide to roll the dice and go back to living uninsured.
Option C -- whatever "plan" Trump and the Republican Congress come up for to "replace" the ACA with is a trainwreck. The people in the video that did benefit from the ACA get screwed, at least short term. But the thing is ... "fool me once". Some of them would be pissed, and wouldn't forget. Some would blame Trump and the GOP. Some would remember Trump's answer to Kathy in the video -- that the ACA isn't perfect, but it could be improved. But that her Senator (a Republican) isn't talking about doing that, he's talking about dumping it.
Maybe a bunch of people get fooled again, and eat up whatever excuses Trump, the GOP, and Fox News feed them. But some will remember. And it doesn't take a whole lot to shift the balance of power -- popular vote totals are often just a few percentage points apart. I think it will be extremely hard for the GOP to avoid a major shakeup in midterms and/or 2020.
If your New Year's resolution is to quit smoking...
The smokers seemed more amused than anything else really. Maybe they could make a better one that detects what brand you're smoking and makes pithy comments. Or one that detects weed and starts to get stoned.
Stephen Colbert - Voting: Now Is The Time!
This is the best thing that's come from the election so far.
Jon just makes life better *quality
An American-Muslim comedian on being typecast as a terrorist
That last bit is what really makes this better than great.
Bill Maher - Bernie Sanders and the Democratic Biopsy
I 100% agree that not only is Bernie the better candidate and would make a better President than either Clinton or Trump, he would also have a better chance of beating Trump.
Republicans might not like Sanders on a political level ("ermahgerd, teh socialism is coming!", etc), but they DESPISE Clinton on a personal level.
And let's be honest, most of that has nothing to do with her real or perceived failings.. it's because
a) she's a woman and
b) she was married to Bill.
But that is irrelevant because Clinton is the candidate.
Addressing your other points:
"Trump is a womanizer / misogynist / predator. Yeah, and Clinton is married to a worse one who disgraced the Presidency while he was in office.
Trump lies constantly. As opposed to the Clintons, who would never lie. For example, "I did not have sexual relations with that woman" (Bill), "it depends on what the meaning of the word 'is' is" (Bill)"
Sorry, I missed the part where Bill Clinton was the nominee. Leaving aside the dubious nature of the allegations against him, the point is that he's not the candidate, Hillary is.
The email thing was bad, but as has been gone over many times, it was stupid rather than malicious.
"Trump has no experience with government and would make an incompetent president. What's worse: a crooked / corrupt Washington insider that knows how to game the system, or someone with no experience?"
Easy, Trump is worse. When did we all decide that being able to make deals was a bad thing? That's what politics is. If you don't know the system, you will get railroaded.
Now, my preference would have been for someone who knows the system and wants to change it, but as that's not going to happen, I'll take someone who can get shit done over an inexperienced buffon any day.
Once again, I completely agree that Bernie would have stood a better chance than Hillary of being elected, but it pretty much doesn't matter anymore. Everyday that passes Trump slips further behind, giving me some small hope for humanity.
http://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2016-election-forecast/
... parapharsed...
Bernie would be better than Clinton or Trump.
Bill is a womanizer
Clinton lies constantly.
Political experience.
Meyers - Mike Pence Pretends Trump Isn't His Running Mate
Which still makes her a better candidate than Trump.
Fuck, I saw a few dogs today that would make a better candidate than Trump. At least, they had the brains to sit down and STFU when told to.
Just because you fucked the President does not make you Presidential !
Michelle - All she has done is forced unwanted ( healthier) school lunches.
Aisha Tyler plays Cards Against Humanity
and i will *quality it because it makes lives better. Aisha makes me feel better. She is wonderful.
I will *promote the shit out of this as long as I can because I believe it will make lives better.
Aisha Tyler plays Cards Against Humanity
I will *promote the shit out of this as long as I can because I believe it will make lives better.
John Green Debunks the Six Reasons You Might Not Vote
Churchill is consistently misquoted by omission. He said:
Noocracy has not been tried. Neither has sophocracy or technocracy. All these are transparently better than democracy.
Churchill is not to be taken to have meant, 'don't bother trying to make things better, just resign yourself forever to the politics of American Idol'.
Democracy is the worst form of government, except for all the others.
― Winston Churchill
Bill Maher: Who Needs Guns?
Actually, folks are already are disqualified if mentally defective.
That's one of the things you're asked when filling out form 4473 when you try to buy a firearm, and it's one of the things checked when running the background check.
The fact that they ask the question is just to have the ability to charge you with a crime (lying to the govt) should you try to hide your status.
Also, currently, guns are confiscated after one is adjudicated mentally defective.
(This is a matter of contention lately, because elderly people have had their guns taken when they run out of money and are put under state financial management - because being unable to manage your own funds (hard to do when savings run dry and welfare doesn't pay enough to cover basic living expenses) indicates a mental defect).
The selective service act already has compulsory military service when called upon.
As a sidenote, being well trained with the use of firearms does not inhibit misuse of those firearms. It just makes you better at using firearms.
-scheherazade
One problem with your anecdote. Swiss citizens (men compulsory, women voluntarily) are required, by law, to become part of their citizen military, a militia if you will, and receive intense training and practice with weapons. The process also weeds out the whack jobs, who don't get to buy guns.
The Swiss procedure should be adopted by the US. It'd be a great way to use up the defense budget without invading anywhere...
Britain Leaving the EU - For and Against, Good or Bad?
@gorillaman
"Democracy is the worst form of government, except for all the others."
I still just don't think at a fraction of 11% it's worth worrying about. Certainly not enough to actually alter social law. You look at France (also at 11% immigrant) and if anything there's been overreaction with the bans on face covering.
I'm sure the UK could do more to encourage assimilation. A basic part of that would simply be making a better effort of pushing migrants into training / jobs if they're not immediately able to, which forces you to adapt to the country's culture and mores. Settling migrants in poor areas with often high existing unemployment rates is a terrible way to integrate migrants and also naturally stirs up hate among the local population.
Groups of migrants will tend to congregate when they arrive but even if some of these initially end up on welfare, there's always a strong financial incentive to become employed which will force them to integrate. Meanwhile, we know that even if the migrants are religious, their children and further descendants are much less likely to be.
ChaosEngine
(Member Profile)
Make a better argument.
logic is not your strong point, is it?