Subsection (2) of this section shall not apply to vehicles used by the Washington state patrol for general undercover or confidential investigative purposes. Traffic control vehicles of the Washington state patrol may be exempted from the requirements of subsection (2) of this section at the discretion of the chief of the Washington state patrol.

" @ Ant and everybody else;

Hello, Grammar Warrior! It doesn't matter! I'm eleven, [yeah, yeah.] At least they aren't typing like this;
lol u so stupid if ur a grammar nazi sooo stupid I mean like omg smh!
Text slang sucks, I know.
But these are simple typos. Newtboy made a mistake by typing it's instead of its? Hey, let's start a war!
Shut up, and thank you...

... TEA PARTY ANYONE? " .


Now that you are Eleven you can learn to read the terms of service/usage agreement.

Section Ch.0.g.g.I of the act

Personal Use

The Service is made available to you for your personal use only. Due to the Children's Online Privacy Protection Act of 1998 (which is available at http://www.ftc.gov/ogc/coppa1.htm), you must be at least thirteen (13) years of age to use this Service. You must provide current, accurate identification, contact, and other information that may be required as part of the registration process and/or continued use of the Service. You are responsible for maintaining the confidentiality of your Service password and account, and are responsible for all activities that occur thereunder. VideoSift reserves the right to refuse service to anyone at any time without notice for any reason.

I never said anything about what the public thought, because I never interviewed them and, quite frankly, I don't care.

My issue is the reporter predicted the future.

"Some people said ... ." (past tense, showing action happened)
"Some people are saying ... ." (present tense, but isn't all present tense past tense by default?)
"Some people would say ... ." (future tense)

And I don't think journalists should predict the future, even if they don't attribute their sources. Good journalists report the facts, which means they're limited to reporting on events that have already happened, not what would or could or will potentially happen.

And as for protecting sources (real, or even imaginary):
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/06/03/us/james-risen-faces-jail-time-for-refusing-to-identify-a-confidential-source.html

Scarbs has been invaluable to us F1 fans, he along with Peter Windsor are both trusted all over the pitlane and gives us the small details that usually are not revealed. And both of them know how to keep confidentiality, good journalists.

I'd actually rather have the DVDs and give Allan Spencer some dosh. He seems like a cool guy.

Also they come with a cool "Confidential Report" insert which is quite funny.

But giving out a patients medical information is highly likely to result in a firing. This is vitally important to this issue, its not a restaurant order, its the private and confidential medical history of a person, a royal no less.

>> ^Trancecoach:

client confidentiality pertains to identifying information. do you have any knowledge about who this person is besides what I told you?>> ^chingalera:
>> ^Trancecoach:
I have a client in my therapy practice who is a biological man who dresses and behaves (for the most part) as a woman.. and dates women.

Three cheers for Trancecoach/client confidentiality
I was in a movie with a pre-op transvestite during a tenure in San Francisco....As well as being recruited as an extra by my GF for her film class, she landed me a steady gig as a nude studio model-Ahh, youth!
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0464386/
note the rambling, full-summary??



NO sir, I do not...you're right-I did however, anticipate this response and that it would come from a defensive posture or with this perfectly acceptable justification. Your client sounds like an interesting person-

client confidentiality pertains to identifying information. do you have any knowledge about who this person is besides what I told you?>> ^chingalera:

>> ^Trancecoach:
I have a client in my therapy practice who is a biological man who dresses and behaves (for the most part) as a woman.. and dates women.

Three cheers for Trancecoach/client confidentiality
I was in a movie with a pre-op transvestite during a tenure in San Francisco....As well as being recruited as an extra by my GF for her film class, she landed me a steady gig as a nude studio model-Ahh, youth!
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0464386/
note the rambling, full-summary??

>> ^Trancecoach:

I have a client in my therapy practice who is a biological man who dresses and behaves (for the most part) as a woman.. and dates women.


Three cheers for Trancecoach/client confidentiality

I was in a movie with a pre-op transvestite during a tenure in San Francisco....As well as being recruited as an extra by my GF for her film class, she landed me a steady gig as a nude studio model-Ahh, youth!
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0464386/

*note the rambling, full-summary??

>> ^nock:

>> ^shinyblurry:
It's a great ad if you're not interested in facts:
http://factcheck.org/2012/06/obamas-outsourcer-overreach/
You might also want to consider President Obamas outsourcing record:
http

/www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/obamas-record-on-outsourcing-draws-criticism-from-the-left/2012/07/09/gJQAljJCZW_story.html

Your rebuttal is only true if he indeed left Bain in 1999, which is why he is adamantly denying involvement up to 2002 despite recent evidence to suggest otherwise.


The Obama campaign hasn't actually provided any evidence that their accusations are true. That Romney signed a few documents while they were transferring ownership of the company doesn't prove Romney was actually running the company. He was working 112 hour work weeks running the Olympics; how was he supposed to have an active role at Bain?

There is also the evidence of three confidential offering documents distributed to potential investors, two in 2000, 1 in 2001, in which Romneys name is conspicuously absent from. If he was really running the company, his name would have been on them:

http://factcheck.org/2012/07/romneys-bain-years-new-evidence-same-conclusion/

Noomi Rapace (original G.W.D.T. trilogy), Guy Pearce (Memento, LA Confidential), Charlize Theron, Michael Fassbender, Idris Elba (the Wire), Logan Marshall-Green.

Really excited about Noomi, Guy and Charlize being in it.

From National Confidential site:

Fox News host Sean Hannity thanked the wrong president for killing Osama Bin Laden on his Thursday night program. Hannity, who reliably repeats Republican talking points on his conservative program, claimed that Bin Laden had been killed thanks to the actions of former President George W. Bush.

In fact, it was under Bush that Bin Laden committed the worst terrorist attack in U.S. history and was able to escape capture in large part thanks to the invasion of Iraq authorized by Bush.

When Ron Paul says he's for limited government and fiscal responsibility, he practices what he preaches:

Congressman Ron Paul has continued to run his Congressional office in a frugal manner, and was able to return more than $100,000 from his allotted office budget to the Treasury this year, an increase over the $90,000 returned last year.

“Since my first year in Congress representing the 14th district I have managed my office in a frugal manner, instructing staff to provide the greatest possible service to the people of the 14th district at the least possible cost to taxpayers,” said Paul.

I'm sad we have to wait a whole year before season 7 starts

Season 7 of Dr Who was pushed back to fall of 2012 and Dr who confidential has been cancelled

That makes me like Ron Paul more (not enough to vote for him, but more).

>> ^bareboards2:

But then Perry's campaign responded the same day this was released:
http://campaign2012.washington
examiner.com/blogs/beltway-confidential/ron-paul-ca-1987-reagan-has-no-credibility