Golly ... play me more [NOT!] =oD

>> ^Krupo:

>> ^BoneRemake:
Good GOlly ! I WAS WRONG ?
NEVERR !

lol we all learned something today. laziness will result in the need to come up with a witty retort, for starters


Flip your bitch switch.

>> ^BoneRemake:

Good GOlly ! I WAS WRONG ?
NEVERR !


lol we all learned something today. laziness will result in the need to come up with a witty retort, for starters

Good GOlly ! I WAS WRONG ?

NEVERR !

My golly, I would ride that just for the sweet, sweet Russian rock n' roll.

Well golly moses shucks and darn.

Thanks for a quality on my old old vid!

I was sad that my boys were ignored the first time around.

Even if they don't take off, even with your assist, I am happy that someone else liked them.

They crack me up and amaze me at the same time.


In reply to this comment by oritteropo:
*quality

By golly that's simply marvelous, old chap!

>> ^halfAcat:

where X runs from 1 to 4, Y from 1 to 6 and Z from 1 to 5


Golly Jeeves, can't a chap just say there are 4 seasons of 6 episodes, each split into 5 parts?

I like the new tangent... so, if Ron Paul isn't a Racist.... well by golly he's at least a Homophobe!


and if he's not a Homophobe, then he should be better able to convince everyone... just like Obama has worked tirelessly for Gay Rights every day... oh wait.

I've had sex with men and I'm going to write Ron Paul in the ballot if he's not on it. End of story. I'm not going to cry about the fact that he is basically not gay. He is not a homosexual... so why would anyone expect him to be tolerant AND understanding? I'll settle for the first one. He doesn't have to like it, and I believe eventually the legislation will reflect this to be a non-issue. It will take more time.

You guys can be smartasses all you want, but it is sad that you're willing to extrapolate conclusions you're posting.

-----

1:30 to 2:11 --- He speaks about the Right to own property privately. He says the UN will not protect those rights.

4:13 to 4:37 -- The UN will not let us practice religion in the same way.

6:29 to end -- Describes lack of need for UN to talk to other countries. The UN is taking our sovereignty by acting as the middle man. 54 representatives vote for a measure to withdraw from the UN.
---------------------

By golly he must have wrote those things about blacks and AIDS!

I'd really like to draw the same conclusions but I really dont know what source material you all are watching... this is far from paranoia

PS: Why are do you mention Lew Rockwell at all, and ignore Murray Rothbard and Eric Dondero?

Rockwell has denied responsibility for the newsletters' contents to The New Republic's Jamie Kirchick. Rockwell twice declined to discuss the matter with reason, maintaining this week that he had "nothing to say."

Murray Rothbard championed an open strategy of exploiting racial and class resentment to build a coalition with populist "paleoconservatives," producing a flurry of articles and manifestos whose racially charged talking points and vocabulary mirrored the controversial Paul newsletters

Eric Dondero was a staffer who was fired.
http://www.dailypaul.com/196808/while-one-fired-fmremployee-passive-aggressively-betrays-rp-one-finally-clarifies

In 1993, Rothbard wrote about Malcolm X and discussed the possibility of a separate state for blacks, but concluded that it would "require massive "foreign aid" from the U.S.A.". He also described black nationalism as "a phony nationalism" that was "beginning to look like a drive for an aggravated form of coerced parasitism over the white population."

http://www.lewrockwell.com/rothbard/rothbard218.html


You guys are starting to look silly and I'm starting to wonder just how hard you need to try to prove something that you say is so obvious. You know, like the clip of GW Bush giving the camera the middle finger. There has to be an actual slip up, not just your own interpretation of someone elses interpretation of something someone read.

>> ^GenjiKilpatrick:

WHINING LIKE A CHILD IS NOT HELPFUL IN AN ASSAULT.
That dumb old lady didn't do a goddamn thing but be dumb.
@petpeeved
"Thursday the argument began between employee 31-year old Rayon McIntosh and two friends" [as per Bareboards info]
If you're friends with someone, I think you would probably know if they were a felon or not. Unless they just became friends 5 minutes before the attack.
Second of all, STFU you Politically Correct Lovey Dovey overly sensitive child.
Calling some dumb bitch a dumb bitch is appropriate if he or she is a dumb bitch.
Slapping someone makes you a Bitch[or Jerk or Douche]. Starting a fight with a MURDERER makes you Dumb. Hence DUMB BITCHES.
On top of that, much worse shit happens to millions of people all over world on a daily basis.
And much braver people do much more to help in those situations than just stand and shout.
That old lady is NOT a Hero. You have to be heroic for that.
So clearly you're being just as hyperbolic to counter what you see a "people being mean".
When in reality, Me and Darkhand and Budzos are being practical.
HE KILLED A MOTHERFUCKER.
You don't fuck with a felon and if you gonna make a difference you have to ACT.
Not just use rhetoric in an attempt to persuade an ENRAGED MURDERER that his murderous intent is misguided. Again, you have to be HEROIC to be a Hero.
Stop talking like the world is made of rainbows and gumdrops dude.
This shit wasn't that bad in the scheme of things.
Plus those dumbass ladies should have known better.
End of Story.


I love these little teaching moments on the Sift. You aren't going to find this level of sharing on YouTube, my friends! So much strange lingo nowadays, it's hard to understand what the kids are conversing about sometimes! LOL! Am I right? You know I am! LOL!

Anyhoo... it makes me feel like I'm really part of a special community to see others sharing like this. So let me say thank YOU and share what I've learned.

- If you are going to assault someone, emoting in a child-like manner will not gain you any advantage. Very important! (it was CAPITALIZED)

Shoutouts to Petpeeved, yo... (Is that the correct lingo? Do I sound streety? LOL! I'm still learning!)

- If you wish to be friends with someone, remember... they could be a felon. ASK about their criminal background before it's too late. Ideally, within the first five minutes.

- If you act like a PC love-child, you may as well be trying to Save The Fucking Universe. So, so true. Word, Petpeeved.

- Dumb bitches are dumb bitches if they are indeed acting like dumb bitches. A "lightbulb" moment for me.

- Slapping someone ALSO makes you a "Bitch". I assume "Jerk" and "Douche" are synonyms (not clear though). And if you start a fight with a murderer, you are "dumb". But if start a fight with a MURDERER with a slap, you are a "dumb bitch". Golly, this is getting confusing. What if I want to start a fight, via slapping, with someone who just has a couple parking tickets?

You know what? This was already a lot to soak up and then you go and throw out "hyperbolic". Now, I'm gonna Google that later, but for now, imma jus' chil, yo, and chawn sum bogchi. Haha! Ok, bye for now! Try not to be such a dumb bitch, jerk, or douche, or you might get slapped! LOL! (Did I say that right?)

>> ^Darkhand:

How do you say "Daaaaayyummmmmmmm" in English?

"Golly gosh."

Okay, you want to take it to the next hyperbolic stage? How about a more appropriate comparison that is on your level?

If I put a gun to your head, and say, "Rape your own children or I'll kill you," then by golly I wonder what you would do.

If you come across me dying of thirst in the desert, and you say "I'll rescue you, as long as you give me your house," I would say "Fuck yeah! Why the fuck did I end up in this stupid desert (Job) to begin with!"

I say those are all bullshit examples you shot back--and that my responses are just as bullshitty. But that aside, this is more a societal problem than an individual problem. Because everyone clings desperately to the meager jobs that corporations dangle in front of us with like carrots...

>> ^NetRunner:

>> ^Lawdeedaw:
Forced is a misrepresentation too. Not to focus on the small, but you are not forced to work for Target, so therefore you are not forced to watch this.
If I put a gun to your head, and say "sing me a lullabye, or I'll kill you," I'm not forcing you to do anything, you have a choice.
If I come across you dying of thirst in the desert, and I say "I'll rescue you, as long as you give me your house," I'm not forcing you to do anything, you have a choice.
If I say "watch this video or you're fired", I'm not forcing you to do anything, you have a choice.
I say all of those statements are false, and for the same reason. Coercion is being applied every time. The last one is certainly the least intense form, but it's coercion just the same.
And when unemployment is at its worst in most people's lifetimes, there's not a real big difference between the 2nd and 3rd scenarios, especially for people who were making their living working at Target when times were good.

-Yeah, breaker one-nine, this here's the Rubber Duck,
you got a copy on me Pigpen? C'mon.

-Ah yeah, ten-four Pigpen, for sure, for sure.
By golly it's clean clear to Flagtown. C'mon.

-Yeah, that's a big ten-four there Pigpen. Yeah, we definitely got the
front door good buddy. Mercy sakes alive, looks like we got us a convoy!

and what bigotry is that? by god, i was just called a knob-gobbler by some cretin who believes that homosexuals are beneath him! what a lout! i'll be sure to explain to him your theories on ethnocentric bias, by golly. as we both know, you're incapable of committing ethnocentric bias -- cultural jack-of-all-trades that you are -- and will not have to worry about being seen as a shitty holier-than-thou hypocrite.

In reply to this comment by GenjiKilpatrick:
Alas, you would be wrong to assume that.

That would be entail - C. fallacy of refutation: straw person

Here, look on this nifty chart. You'll probably need it later on.

But again, what does any of this have to do with your bigotry?
[Which you clearly understand and accept.]

In reply to this comment by solecist:
says the guy who just called us thick-skulled knob-gobblers. what is a knob-gobbler, genji? am i right in assuming that you've just used a term referencing male homosexuality in a negative manner? sounds like ethnocentric bias to me. i would know, because some pretentious twat just told me all about it.