who cares if you are a liberal or a conservative? cant you get it through your thick heads (both sides) there is a lot more going wrong in this country than red or blue rights?

start thinking like an American, instead of buying into this partisan bullsh*t you've been fed since birth.

It takes two parties to perpetrate a successful lie. One to manufacture it, and another to accept it as truth.

Yeah. And everyone is gobbling it right up. red! blue! liberal! conservative! ribble! rabble!

Anyone else notice that the siren sounds oddly similar to the turkey's "gobble"? I'm wondering if the turkey thought the squad car was trying to mate with it?

The cop ate that turkeys mother last Thanksgiving. He had it coming. Gobble gobble, bitches!

>> ^rottenseed:
^amen, sister!


Translation: "Gobble, gobble, KP. Gobble."

Comment hidden because you are ignoring dag. (show it anyway)

Beat me by 14 minutes. This video is exactly the kind of video McCain claimed he would not do - and will be gobbled up by certain impressionable numb skulls.

It's a white blood cell (neutrophil) chasing a bacterium via chemotaxis.
Neutrophils are phagocytes, so one of the ways they neutralize foreign objects in the body is by engulfing them.

and here is a video of a neutrophil gobbling up fungal cell like they were power pellets:
here

I mentioned before the issues I had with Verizon wireless on MG's rant-blog about his similar woes-2 broadband card accounts, purchased a month apart, (same billing account) one under an unlimited use plan for downloads, and the other, changed a month later by VZ, limited to 5Gb per billing cycle-

The operatives at Verizon (highly skilled and knowledgeable specialists), assured me that it would be next to impossible to go over 5GB a month(.49 cents per MB....MB mind you, over the alloted 5GB, this under the new plan). I had them run the numbers on the first account, my usage during but 17 days of the billing cycle-......27GB's and counting!!!

do the math-under the new plan, I would be charged for .49 X 22528 = $11038.72.....if I'da got that bill I would have been looking to kill the P.T. Barnum motherfucker that came up with that charge plan.

They see the writing on the wall....someone needs to address the gobble-problem. I say we place children who are addicted to P2P in work camps, and wives???...Beat senseless your husbands and children who watch porn or any lame video content.....

Tofumar, I suspect you do not know the definition of denounce or reject, or you are just too lazy to look the words up. I watched Obama interviews in reply to Jeremiah Wright's so called sermons, both on CNN and FOX. Excuses, Excuses, Excuses! "I do not agree with all of his beliefs.......but....... and......but.......he is like an Uncle to me......" He no longer serves on his campaign committee! Yeah, o.k. and I guess you are going to tell me that 1 and 1 = 9 and I am going to gobble it up.

Hoho, gobble gobble.

Silly up vote for gobble gobble! Though I believe he is more chicken hawk than turkey.

But what would be so wrong with that? As the site grows, and new diamonds are minted (or, rather, wouldn't that be carbonized? -am not up on my geologic terminology obviously), which at this point is inevitable, the number of channels will inevitably increase and have to become more narrow by definition... its like any library or large database, as it grows, so does the complexity of the cross referencing.

I mean, what would be the problem with having a WW2 or Vietnam channel? Eventually that might be kind of cool, but until then, it is not as if there isn't a home for them, there are always the history and military channels to append those videos to. And anyway, if 99% of the vids for the channel I am creating are going to be about the current 'War on Terror' then why not limit it to just that? Why have the random inclusion of clips from Vietnam? They would be so out of place amongst all the vids from the current conflict that I don't see the point in including them.

Also, as it stands, if I designate my channel as simply 'war' and gobble up all the submissions related to 'war', then there is the built in possibility that I will be duplicating the content of the 'military' channel... when really, what I have envisioned for this channel, is a place on the sift that will foster discussion on the current war (which given the numbers, is a hot topic here, and deserves to be highlighted), not wars that have been fought and done with.

If its the ability to filter out vids that people might find too violent or graphic that you are thinking of, then the *Graphic or *Raw tags that have been proposed will take care of this, with users being able to filter these vids out. This would then filter out any other potentially violent vids containing other subject matter, like that one that popped up recently of the monks (or was it journalist?) getting shot in Burma, which otherwise, has no place in the channel I am aiming to create.

So... you put a link in the comments and forgot to vote up this video http://www.videosift.com/video/Talking-cat-says-hello-hellohellohello, mt256? Hmmmm?

In reply to this comment by mt256:
http://www.videosift.com/video/Twyx-the-gobbling-cat

more along the lines of channeling infants from the afterlife and translating to cat song than gobbling really.....

http://www.videosift.com/video/Twyx-the-gobbling-cat

gobble, gobble - *discard