chingalera said:

Oh, he'd "like to say welcome instead"...Yeah right.

Hiatus over...... and message to you of a new and improved mission: To post personal apologies to all who care to wonder why they were unilaterally banned with glee, regardless of yer paltry, after-the-fact entreats and meager apologies or admissions as to why, and offer to post the banned self-linker's viddies or whomever the fuck in spite of your masturbatory coptitudeinal penchant, to fah fah fah fah...fuh fuh fuh fuh ..k cah kk cah cah ewe ewe ewe like ya been fucking the fuck outta who??!..Paste that on yer profile page and smoke it, troll-trollmaton.

chingalera said:

I'll try again at a point-by-point answer for yas but geez man, you seem thicker than most.

I CHOSE to pester your banning-manner repeatedly because you were cold-hearted and in-general, the matter-of-fact un-welcomingly rude person to potentials who obviously either had some language-barriers some of them, while others simply did not read the long-winded faq-sheet buried in that un-intutive portion of the site map (notwithstanding, MOST of the fuckers you ban are spamtacular and obviously not giving a damn an anyhow....GOOD JOB. ATTA-BOY. Clean the place up, not slighting you for that aspect of your fun here).

Your didactic reasoning supports your hollow assumptions (if such feeble tripe could be called that) and here in these latest and repeated insults and accusations concerning myself all we see are petulant forays into your own limitations in the realm of deductive reasoning at best, or 180 degrees off-kilter at their crudest and worst. MEANING, your assumptions of my legal status and sexual proclivities in particular, as you struggle at what seems justification for your delusional rants. You're basically unilaterally seeking to defame my personal integrity and character because you feel bad about me having poked you so much about yer ban-user fun here.m Real simple. Not too much thinking required, and you are over-thinking to stroke your own, knight-in-rusty-sheriff's-badge honor, plain and fucking simple.

I tried the last comment to show you your misinterpretation of meaning by using the definition of 'haitus', the same which has no fixedm limitation other than that of the will of the vacationer. Read a fucking dictionary maybe, with a view to meaning rather than the view of how it suits your own confabulation?

I didn't say did I, that I was taking anything but a hiatus, which could be long or short....and if you know me at all you know I won't stand for insolent crackers who in my absence, with a personal hard-on to burn me and shit all over my work and time logged here on this site, one of which I have been on since near it's inception, ya thick lump?. Did you think I'd let the place pull a kronospissant on me again? From the likes of who?! You may want to get a fucking clue.

You need some some growin'-up there fatwa (look it up) if ya think my skin ain't thicker than yer skull.

You take shit to pedantically literal to be hanging your shit in my store and expecting me to take you anything more than a seriously misanthropic humanoid.

Tired of being polite with you chicco, yer obviously in need of some quality human interaction and maybe some therapy to deal with the Aspberger's, unless yer dysfunction be something simpler to counterman. I am unqualified to determine such as, "I Am Not A Mental Health Professional."

Ain't 'private' anymore either, your shit screams abuse of the site, for all to see.

chingalera said:

In reference to your comments to the ether (and to me personally) on one of the last user accounts you initiated the ostracization rights for:

Jesus dude, and you wanna talk incoherently of my ‘issues’. Simply put, my only issue is the bile issuing-forth concerning me. The most glaring malfunction is your continued cloaked ad-hom in the form of insults and derision in response to playful comments from time to time as you obsessively seek-out bannable accounts, which no one surely reads anyway since discarded videos don’t show-up on the front pages. Oh yeah and btw, haven’t been to the sift a handful of minutes in the past 3 days and the bulk of that time was not waiting for you to chime-in with more personal attacks.
In particular here, your ‘little thing’ comments in parenthesis to avoid breaking the rule of using ad-hom with another site user. In reference to my current moniker, ‘chingalera’, the definition of the same having been taken from the first google search referencing the urban dictionary, you’re basically in this diatribe calling me a fucking little thing over there, thereby dismissing me while insulting me publicly and protecting yourself from admonition in order to avoid account suspension.


Cowardice, plain and simple. The same sentiments I expressed to your upvote-comment-junkie pal newtboy as have I to others in the past.

Why not simply refer to me in comments as “little fucking thing over there” like you’d like to but for a paranoid concerned about being hobbled or having your account suspended by the admins? I believe the term that best suits your continued hate-filled comments to me would be hypocrite.

You’d still be somewhat of a gentleman to apologize for calling me out publicly suggesting I am some child-molester, a mentally unfit person, or a felon, of which I am none of these.

Your arguments are weak and childish.

In keeping with my credo here of let private conversations remain private, I respond to your stream of comments privately. Try to maintain a modicum of respect for that which I have extended yourself, please? I don't expect it to be so, but it would be a pleasant surprise and a refreshing change of pace and it might even become an exercise in your recognizing the dishonesty of your process.

I remind you of this courtesy, newtboy recently also, as well as users similar. Certain personalities with a personal hard-on to see others burn when shown the truth of their process seem to like to plaster the shit everywhere in a kind of standardized, passive-aggressive form.

chingalera said:

In reference to your comments to the ether (and to me personally) on one of the last user accounts you initiated the ostracization rights for:

Jesus dude, and you wanna talk incoherently of my ‘issues’. Simply put, my only issue is the bile issuing-forth concerning me. The most glaring malfunction is your continued cloaked ad-hom in the form of insults and derision in response to playful comments from time to time as you obsessively seek-out bannable accounts, which no one surely reads anyway since discarded videos don’t show-up on the front pages. Oh yeah and btw, haven’t been to the sift a handful of minutes in the past 3 days and the bulk of that time was not waiting for you to chime-in with more personal attacks.
In particular here, your ‘little thing’ comments in parenthesis to avoid breaking the rule of using ad-hom with another site user. In reference to my current moniker, ‘chingalera’, the definition of the same having been taken from the first google search referencing the urban dictionary, you’re basically in this diatribe calling me a fucking little thing over there, thereby dismissing me while insulting me publicly and protecting yourself from admonition in order to avoid account suspension.


Cowardice, plain and simple. The same sentiments I expressed to your upvote-comment-junkie pal newtboy as have I to others in the past.

Why not simply refer to me in comments as “little fucking thing over there” like you’d like to but for a paranoid concerned about being hobbled or having your account suspended by the admins? I believe the term that best suits your continued hate-filled comments to me would be hypocrite.

You’d still be somewhat of a gentleman to apologize for calling me out publicly suggesting I am some child-molester, a mentally unfit person, or a felon, of which I am none of these.

Your arguments are weak and childish.

In keeping with my credo here of let private conversations remain private, I respond to your stream of comments privately. Try to maintain a modicum of respect for that which I have extended yourself, please? I don't expect it to be so, but it would be a pleasant surprise and a refreshing change of pace and it might even become an exercise in your recognizing the dishonesty of your process.

I remind you of this courtesy, newtboy recently also, as well as users similar. Certain personalities with a personal hard-on to see others burn when shown the truth of their process seem to like to plaster the shit everywhere in a kind of standardized, passive-aggressive form.

chingalera said:

*promote and FYI to Captain formulaic. Not even close to being a felon.....yet.
Your information being as hollow as your script.

Darkhand said:

Amazing throw but they don't have to dribble?

So it's like football?

JiggaJonson said:

No, you meant "drivel"

http://www.thefreedictionary.com/drivel
n.
1. Saliva flowing from the mouth.
2. Stupid or senseless talk.

The noun form of the word "dribble" isn't actually saliva:
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/dribble
n.
1. A weak, unsteady stream; a trickle.
2. A small quantity; a bit.
3. Sports The act of dribbling a ball.

Don't worry @rottenseed , I got yo' Bach.
And if you're wondering, sometimes in English we say things we don't mean; but here I mean I literally have rottenseed's Johann Sebastian Bach sex doll. I don't have his back and I'm not some ignorant/smart ass who is pretending to know that I actually mean "back" and not his "Bach." So sometimes we say things we actually mean too.

JiggaJonson said:

One last thing,
I've been thinking about other word pairings that are very similar in phonetic pronunciation, spelling, and meaning. I came up with a few, but, for an example, consider the following:

Think about the difference between the words "sit" and "set"
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/sit
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/set

I can set something on a table.
Or
I can sit something on a table.

But!

If I were to say
"I sit my cactus on the table."
It sounds awkward, less natural compared to:
"I set my cactus on the table."
I assume this is because "sitting" usually refers to a person or other conscious something.

I can say
"I set my son on the table."
OR
"I sit my son on the table."
and have them be allllllllllllmost interchangeable.

Still, the difference remains. The subtle difference in meaning requires that the words differ, expanding and exacting our communication.

If Jinx really meant to say that there was a pool of human saliva that the comments were drowning in, he should have used a verb phrase in his comment like this:
"the comments are already drowning in a sea of dribbling"

oritteropo said:

I would really love you to have persuaded me that I was wrong, but I really think the two words are just too closely related.

I did come across the wonderful descriptive phrase "brain-dribble" from Henry Duff Traill, but not in a sense that helps either of us.

I also came across a Henry Lawson poem, One Hundred and Three, from 1908, which includes this passage:

They double-lock at four o'clock and the warders leave their keys,
And the Governor strolls with a friend at eve through his stone conservatories;
Their window slits are like idiot mouths with square stone chins adrop,
And the weather-stains for the dribble, and the dead flat foreheads atop.

Clearly dribble isn't often used as a noun, and a look at google books found it more often as a name than as a noun, but it is such a close synonym to drivel and slavver that I remain unconvinced that you can't... as much as, like I said, I would love you to have convinced me and for Jinx to have been wrong.

JiggaJonson said:

Meh. The noun form is the one that's really important because that's how it was used in the sentence.

What he said was:
"...it's already lost in a sea of dribble"
What that means is:
"...it's already lost in a sea of the act of dribbling"
or
"...it's already lost in a sea of a small quantity"
or
"...it's already lost in a sea of a slow trickle"

--------------------

The real issue here is the snide response I didn't like and the unwillingness of people to admit they're wrong and correct a mistake.

Ironically, by saying "it's already lost in a sea of dribble," then defending the misuse of that word @Jinx was adding to the drivel on the internet without realizing it.

See also:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confirmation_bias
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect

oritteropo said:

Hmm... we could both have to hand in our pedant cards after this.

The important part of the definition for this discussion is, as a noun, an act or instance of dribbling. The verb means to allow saliva to trickle from the mouth, and the synonyms are:

drool, drivel, slaver, slobber, drip, spit, saliva.

If you say someone had dribble on their face, or had dribbled on their face, you don't need to qualify it with saliva as the meaning is already implied.

You know, it's not too late to ninja-edit both our comments and pretend none of this ever happened...

JiggaJonson said:

Here's a yours vs mine line by line comparison for the noun definition:

a small quantity of liquid falling in drops or flowing in a thin stream
vs.
A weak, unsteady stream; a trickle

a small quantity or supply
vs.
A small quantity; a bit

an act or instance of dribbling
vs.
Sports The act of dribbling a ball