search results matching tag: creationist

» channel: nordic

go advanced with your query
Search took 0.004 seconds

    Videos (147)     Sift Talk (7)     Blogs (28)     Comments (814)   

A Cheetah's Body Is Perfectly Designed For Running

ChaosEngine jokingly says...

Funny how the best argument that we are descended from primates is often creationists themselves... australopithecus-looking motherfuckers.

Anyway I call fake.. that dude was never in Pantera.

newtboy said:

That guy sucks ass as a designer. Look at how many of his designs failed, nearly all of them, well over 99.9%. That's a crappy record....I wouldn't hire him.

Sarah Palin Channel

ChaosEngine says...

only 4.3 million? Well, it's a start, but I was kinda hoping we'd get a lot more.

These people are what's wrong with humanity. They are anti-science idiots who cling to their stone age beliefs waiting for the second coming all the while oblivious to the real apocalypse that we're staring down the barrel of.

After these idiots are gone, we can then move on to the WBC, creationists, homeopaths, astrologists, the food babe and finally to the real menace, Justin Bieber and his fans.

Or maybe it was a fucking joke?

idiot.

Trancecoach said:

That's pretty bigoted and low... especially if you consider the fact that Sarah Palin has 4,298,489 "likes" on Facebook. How many do you have? Who do you think would be more likely to get "euthaized" if that was the (admittedly arbitrary) basis?

I wouldn't go around suggesting that approach if I were you...

Mount St. Helens: Evidence for a young creation

shinyblurry says...

How can you claim to know something (anything) about geology, or that you have studied it, when you don't know what Uniformitarian Geology is? I am just a layman but I know that Uniformitarianism is the cornerstone of geology today. It is not the invention of creationists, it is the invention of Charles Lyell, the father of modern geology. His thesis, "the present is the key to the past", is why geologists believe what they do about how the geologic structures of the Earth were formed.

newtboy said:

It seems you misunderstood that it only references certain features, and volcanoes are not in that category.
It only makes the assumption about the certain kinds of features that have been shown to form only at certain rates....not about every X, which you are ascribing it to...like volcanoes, land slides, mountain range building, etc. (again, not in the category).
Radiometric dating is not 1/2 of geology, or even 1/2 of geologic dating, by far. You misunderstand again.
Uniformitarianism sounds like a theologist creation. Learned geologists know that the world is not uniform, but certain processes are.
I have honestly looked at much of the publicized evidence (it's apparent that you have not) and how they use it to arrive at numerous theories, I am not shocked at all because I understand science and the processes it uses to come to 'conclusions'.

History of Earth - For Creationists (and some Rednecks)

Creationist Cosmos

Creationist Cosmos

VoodooV says...

Would someone fix the embed on the related video. I would do it myself..but I is not rated high enough yet *related=http://videosift.com/video/History-of-Earth-For-Creationists-and-some-Rednecks

Zifnab (Member Profile)

siftbot says...

Congratulations! Your video, Creationist Cosmos, has reached the #1 spot in the current Top 15 New Videos listing. This is a very difficult thing to accomplish but you managed to pull it off. For your contribution you have been awarded 2 Power Points.

This achievement has earned you your "Golden One" Level 41 Badge!

Zifnab (Member Profile)

lurgee (Member Profile)

Huckabee is Not a Homophobe, but...

VoodooV says...

You're hilarious @bobknight33...and a hypocrite. You claim that I'm not worth answering to, yet you still @ my name so you know I would see it...thus..answering me. I see you still haven't backed up your claim, coward

@newtboy Don't let him change the subject. He claims biblical morality is superior to secular morality. Then he changes the subject to evolution, which has nothing to do with his claim. Once again, a creationist is trying to shift the burden of proof. He somehow doesn't have to back up his claims, but we have to somehow disprove god...which science doesn't care about. Science only cares about claims you can back up, which the coward bob will never do.

Bob's got the five D's of Dodgeball down pat.

Atheist professor converts to Christianity

Volump says...

Shiny uses the term "Evolutionists", therefor loses the argument. But, s/he starts from the weakest of grounds to begin with, so it's expected.

The "debate" of science vs religion has been over for ages. I'm not debating that. Just commenting on the dumb terms that creationists have to use to defend their fantasies.

Atheist professor converts to Christianity

ChaosEngine says...

Let's assume your god exists for the purposes of this argument.

If so, I am 99% certain that It (surely something as outside the human experience as God doesn't have a gender?) definitely "did evolution".

Why?

Evidence. An absolutely ungodly (pun intended) amount of it. There's no need to rehash it here, it's been documented and debated here, there and pretty much everywhere on the web. And it's done. Settled question. Evolution, like gravity, is real. There is no argument. At least, none that you, me or any creationist is qualified to make.

And here's the next part... you personally, are absolutely entitled to your opinion that evolution is wrong. And that makes absolutely no difference whatsoever to the reality of the universe.

As for the guy in the video... I have no idea how he became a professor, because he fails to answer the most basic question a student has for him (hint: mutations don't produce "beneficial" changes, they just produce changes. it's the environment that selects the beneficial changes)

shinyblurry said:

The question is did He evolution? I don't think He did, you are free to disagree with that.

Atheist professor converts to Christianity

VoodooV says...

@BoneRemake

maybe you should actually read my "banter"

I didn't say shiny's video fails again. I said shiny fails again. He has already admitted his sole agenda is to push the creationist viewpoint and he has, again, failed to do that with his latest "evidence" He doesn't give a fuck about you dude, so I really wouldn't waste your energy "defending" him.

Atheist professor converts to Christianity

VoodooV says...

you know how creationists like to shift the burden of proof. It's somehow not on them to prove their claims. somehow atheists are supposed to disprove god.

so obviously posting a video of a charlatan "converting" proves creationism.

its so obvious now.

I, however, have no problems making waves with shiny. *lies I'm just not privileged enough

Volump said:

Should be in the * lies channel. But, I don't want to make waves with Shiny.

But this guy has been shown to be the precise charlatan he is 1,000 times before. But this video keeps popping up every year or so.

He's been dead for years, but this is still used as some sort of PROOFZ! that Jesus etc.

The Curious Case of Flight 370



Send this Article to a Friend



Separate multiple emails with a comma (,); limit 5 recipients






Your email has been sent successfully!

Manage this Video in Your Playlists

Beggar's Canyon