search results matching tag: alphanumeric
» channel: nordic
go advanced with your query
Search took 0.000 seconds
- 1
Videos (2) | Sift Talk (0) | Blogs (0) | Comments (3) |
- 1
Videos (2) | Sift Talk (0) | Blogs (0) | Comments (3) |
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Already signed up?
Log in now.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Remember your password?
Log in now.
Ronald Jenkees - Try The Bass (Latest single)
Tags for this video have been changed from 'music, electronic, funk, live, jam, single, alphanumeric' to 'music, electronic, funk, live, jam, single, alphanumeric, Ronald Jenkees' - edited by eric3579
Yeah, well, that's just like, your opinion, man...
Totally saving that for when I want to do a video response instead of a alphanumerical one.
VideoSift version 3.0 Screenshots (Sift Talk Post)
>> Up the tags field!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
The title and tags fields have been increased in vs3 from the outset with limits of 100 and 60, respectively. Also, tag links will work differently (better) and be limited to only alphanumeric chars.
>> can there be a *nuke for the dead pool?? So for duplicates or spam we can permanuke them?
By "permanuke" do you mean completely erase them? I don't think there will ever be a need for such a function. If a dupe is ever posted, it should be discarded immediately upon discovery; if chance has it that a dupe gets enough votes to be published then sits around until hitting the deadpool before it's found to be a dupe, we admins can manually discard. If you're thinking of malicious users in the deadpool, only Bronze Stars will be able to fix deadpool vids, so they should be trusted not to intentionally try to break things.
>> DO NOT MIX in video ads as regular videos
That goes without saying. We've never nor would we ever consider disguising ads as user content. If we ever do end up with video ads intermingling with regular video listings, they would absolutely be clearly marked as such.
Don't know if anyone noticed, but there is also a view count listed on posts so you can see how many times people (other than the submitter) have clicked into the post's detail page.