If you can find it, I'll gladly pull the video. I just spent some time double checking, the incident did happen in August of 2016, so I searched individual terms and checked each one back to 1 year ago just to be sure.

The terms I tried were: cop, police, drunk, spokane, washington, facetime, bodycam, body cam, kannberg, counts (last name of the drunk guy), sue. I tried each one separately just to make sure that it wouldn't limit the hits by other tags being included.

I honestly can't think of anything else to try, so either someone deleted the original, killed it, or they did a reaaaaaly crappy job of tagging it.

Ok - the title delivered its promise. And so did the WTF tag.
Edit: And - in deed all the other tags.

>> ^xxovercastxx:
>> ^Sagemind:
B). Delete a bunch of the channels and slim it down - doing this creates 2 problems:
a). you would have to create an "Other" channel (bad idea).
b). you would have to remove the Ruby reward of being able to create and run a new channel (also a bad idea).

Neither of these things logically follow the choice to trim the channels back. If anything, I think we'd be more likely to stop making new channels if we don't clean up from time to time.
Creating an "other" channel is a bad idea. Why did you come up with it?
I think a combination of cleanup (your option B) and organization (your option A) is the best solution.


Remember that the channels we have were created because we saw a need. If we remove a bunch of them, then there "WILL" be those videos that no longer suit the remaining channels. Which is why I brought up the "Other" tag (a particularly bad idea) because there has to be an option for those videos. (I for one, would never want to see an Other channel.)

I'm sure I can up with channels that can be deleted too but they aren't going to be the same as the next guy that uses those channels. (Cinema, Election08, Future, Humanitarian, Mystery, Obscure, Travel, Woohoo). These were created by people that saw a need for these channels. Categorize the channels, but be careful what you want to remove, cause like I said, I like the channels, as many other do.


Back to the point of this post: EIA and FAIL are different. I suggest the moderators define, judge and remove posts that don't belong. There will always be overlap.

Sort of like the overlap between Animation & Woohoo, Comedy & Happy, Standup & Talks, Music & Livemusic, Conspiracy & Lies...

Overlap doesn't have to mean "the same thing" they are more like adjectives, they help to define.

get very few true *virals on here,... may want to think about dumping one of the other tags that describe aspects of the post to slap on a viral, which is literally what the post is in its entirety.

LOL, glad it works - hurray!

In other news, I claim victory.

I'm adding the geek flag to this vid for two reasons: there were geeks sitting around ready to film this. If they staged it, they're geeks. For getting ready to film this, they're also geeks. Second, independent reason, is because of the comment thread it has inspired.

As for the other tags, I leave the justification to the people who chose to add them...

"Do you nochannel it and then add the other tags back on?
What about an undocumented feature for *nocomedy, *nomusic to toggle categories."

We will be letting gold star members edit channels they way they can edit tags now. However, like all things in life this feature is worth waiting for ;-)

Hmm.. I'm torn on editting channels. I would think they could be tags, and you could just edit the tag. (But then again, we have a serious tag character limit for some reason).

One problem is if a video has three categories, but say it shouldn't be music. Do you nochannel it and then add the other tags back on?
What about an undocumented feature for *nocomedy, *nomusic to toggle categories.