It's funny. Originally I only decided to comment (I've seen 4 vids without) because I had just lost what ever hope was left of CNN and I get so caught up in a political rant that I forget to mention what Legacy put so clearly. Thanks fo saying what I forgot.

And farhad:
It may be reverse satire (maybe), but to be considered satire there still needs to be a contrast to the truth and the depiction, other-wise known as an irony. Where's the truth among the lies? Although I don't etirely know what is meant by reverse satire - do you mean that it depicts reality's opposite and is thus oppositively true? Even if that is what you mean, it must fit the description of the sub-genre satire, before the (sub?) sub-genre reverse satire. But I'm just geussing really.