CNN uses more facts in a day than FOX has total since the days I watched it day in and day out and railed against the commie left, and the dangers of the Demoncrats some 11 years ago (here's a prior version of me on an account I couldn't recover: https://videosift.com/video/Fox-News-takes-Rep-Wexler-from-the-Colbert-Report-out-of-context-I-enjoy-cocaine-because#comment-12957 ... I thought there was another post under that account where I blasted evolution but I don't see it)... had I not opened my eyes and started vetting, I'd probably be right there with you though, so you go and do your thing.

Seems like a good fella.

Breaking the law is breaking the law.

Evey job an illegal has is 1 less for a needing American.

You can go back to Mexico and take do your thing there. Fight fro a better Mexico.

Trump is mostly right on this issue.

Sadly our Government have used this issue for 30+ years for their own political convenience. Good people like this man will get caught in the middle when the music stops.

All things *related to plants that eat some living shit.

Go on siftbot do your thing.

Lots of different/*related sifts of Tim Minchin's Christmas song. This song never gets old

Siftbot do your thing.

Lots of related stuff. Siftbot do your thing.

It is nice when you full screen your second monitor while you are working or whatnot, do your thing on one monitor but the second have this fire full screen. Really nice to be honest.

t is nice when you full screen your second monitor while you are working or whatnot, do your thing on one monitor but the second have this fire full screen. Really nice to be honest.

I don't think that's necessarily fair. I mean look at the presenter, she's a young lady who is used to editing and producing videos on YouTube. She can record the voice over several times. Make cuts and rewrites and basically hone stuff. She's not a public personality, maybe her only experience performing in front of people is making a prewritten talk about Mathematics, or playing music at a fair with bunches of other people. She needs training sure, but what kind of booking is this? I blame the people who put her on, you don't just say "Go up and do your thing!" to someone who makes YouTube videos, she's not a stand up comic.

The basic form of a social contract is the foundation for every state in the world. Every individual within the territory forfeits a set of rights and is imposed with a set of duties instead. That's a social contract as described in Jean-Jacques Rousseau's "Du contrat social".

Doesn't help much with regards to Anglo-Saxon capitalism, does it? Beyond its most basic definition, social contract means, in theory, a recalibration of metrics beyond mere profit, within a society. Whatever metrics one might think would reasonably map progress towards the ultimate goal: the pursuit of happiness.

A concrete example would be the political-economic system of Germany, 1948 onwards, the so-called "Soziale Marktwirtschaft", wherein capitalism is (or was) constrained by agreements to the benefit of the whole of society. Not any individual, not any group, all members of society. Manifestations of it would be the safety net in all its forms and shapes, the health system, the pension system, the rejection of military interventionalism, the preservation of nature, no tolerance for fascism, etc. All specific policies that have their origins in an understanding of what society agreed upon would be best for everyone. The extent is subject to constant political debate, but the underlying concept remains untouched.

So the claim that there is no such thing as a social contract strikes me as a continuation of Thatcher's insistence that there is, in fact, no society. I don't subscribe to that notion, and as far as I can tell, neither does continental Europe as a whole.

If people prefer a system without a "society" beyond the very basic neccessities of a functioning state, go ahead. Do your thing. Competition of ideas and whatnot.

But I'm going to stay a member of this society, thank you very much. And as such, I take the liberty of leaving this "discussion" again. Cheerio.

Also, you're going to die. So even when you are mildly inconvienced, you should realize: "at least I can be annoyed", suck it up and go about doing your thing.

*beg

Do your thing please Mr. Siftbot, this one is too cute not to share

Do your thing please Mr. Siftbot:

*beg

It's also a bit like those quirky British bands you used to hear many years ago (whatever happened to them?).

Do your thing please, Mr. Siftbot, *beg.

This made this game hilarious to play. You could go on for hours doing your thing and then out of nowhere someone is talking about the "cock" and you end up laughing and going "what the fuck... oh yeah."

>> ^KnivesOut:
>> ^MarineGunrock: I guess it's okay to come fuck with people when they're trying to make a living.

If by "making a living" you mean "stretching in public for money", then yes, its OK to fuck with those people.
Now if someone came into my office and started feeding pigeons whilst I was writing a particularly complex database query, then yes, I do believe I'd have every right to punch that cunt in the uterus.


I fail to see the difference. He's doing his thing to make some money (no matter how lame it is), and you're doing your thing to make some money. What makes it okay for someone to come up and do that shit to him, just because he's not "writing a particularly complex database query"?