search results matching tag: 1977

» channel: nordic

go advanced with your query
Search took 0.000 seconds

    Videos (313)     Sift Talk (8)     Blogs (7)     Comments (185)   

bobknight33 (Member Profile)

newtboy says...

Trump’s returns out.
He CLAIMS he lost money 4/6 years. Paid no taxes those years. None. Including 2016 when he made tens of millions from his campaign that he did not fund.
Paid zero taxes 2020 but definitely “made” money (hundreds of millions in donations used for personal expenses).
Claimed tens of millions in exemptions for donations he claimed to have made with zero receipts or evidence, not investigated.
Trump hid his taxes claiming he was under audit and couldn’t. 1st, being under audit in no way stops a person from releasing his taxes and 2nd, he was not actually under audit….not even the mandatory audit every president is subjected to by law. It was 100% lies, no audit ever happened.

The entire “I’m under audit” claim was another lie.

He had an obligation to be audited, but he knew for certain he had stopped that process and no audit was happening.
The IRS NEVER audited his returns, despite the legal requirement to do so since 1977 and claims they were being audited. IRS refused to turn them over to congress as required by law. Now we know why, they prove he’s a massive tax cheat and horrific business man so he installed criminal lackeys to protect his image. They now claim they didn’t know there was any obligation to audit him (with absolutely no explanation why they lied) despite being told on camera dozens of times and claiming on camera dozens of times they were auditing his taxes.
More MAGA fraud and criminality from the top. More subversion for personal gain. Always from MAGA. It’s all MAGA is, crime and lies, treason and sedition, hate and fear. Absolutely zero redeeming qualities in the party at all, not a one.

Remembering Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg

newtboy says...

You do know you have zero credibility, right?
If you claim she said or did these things, that's enough evidence for most people that she didn't.
Oh...surprise surprise surprise, 1 minute to find it's definitely utter bullshit. That was not in the 1977 report. Fuck you you liar.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2020/09/19/fact-check-ruth-bader-ginsburg-didnt-advocate-lower-age-consent/5838998002/


Also, you're a real piece of shit making up lies and talking ill of the dead before they're in the ground, one worthless human being in every way. Please tell your family to notify us when you die so we can spend a few days talking shit about you, telling everyone who will listen you sucked off 11 year old boys regularly, turnabout is fair play. Now kindly choke on a bag of baby dicks and die, liar.

bobknight33 said:

230-page book called Sex Bias in the U.S. Code, published in 1977 by the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights.

Remembering Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg

bobknight33 says...

230-page book called Sex Bias in the U.S. Code, published in 1977 by the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights.
Highlights:


Called for the sex-integration of prisons and reformatories so that conditions of imprisonment, security and housing could be equal. She explained, “If the grand design of such institutions is to prepare inmates for return to the community as persons equipped to benefit from and contribute to civil society, then perpetuation of single-sex institutions should be rejected.” (Page 101)





>Called for reducing the age of consent for sexual acts to people who are “less than 12 years old.” (Page 102)


>Asserted that laws against “bigamists, persons cohabiting with more than one woman, and women cohabiting with a bigamist” are unconstitutional. (Page 195)


>Objected to laws against prostitution because “prostitution, as a consensual act between adults, is arguably within the zone of privacy protected by recent constitutional decisions.” (Page 97)
>Ginsburg wrote that the Mann Act (which punishes those who engage in interstate sex traffic of women and girls) is “offensive.” Such acts should be considered “within the zone of privacy.” (Page 98)


>Demanded that we “firmly reject draft or combat exemption for women,” stating “women must be subject to the draft if men are.” But, she added, “the need for affirmative action and for transition measures is particularly strong in the uniformed services.” (Page 218)


>An indefatigable censor, Ginsburg listed hundreds of “sexist” words that must be eliminated from all statutes. Among words she found offensive were: man, woman, manmade, mankind, husband, wife, mother, father, sister, brother, son, daughter, serviceman, longshoreman, postmaster, watchman, seamanship, and “to man” (a vessel). (Pages 15-16)


>Wanted he, she, him, her, his, and hers to be dropped down the memory hole. They must be replaced by he/she, her/him, and hers/his, and federal statutes must use the bad grammar of “plural constructions to avoid third person singular pronouns.” (Page 52-53)

>Condemned the Supreme Court’s ruling in Harris v. McRae and claimed that taxpayer-funded abortions should be a constitutional right.
http://humanevents.com/2005

newtboy (Member Profile)

Air Canada plane’s near-disaster at SFO

Ashenkase says...

Those two pilots will probably never fly a commercial aircraft again after the investigation.

The negative outcome would have been horrific.

Its bad enough when two aircraft strike one another like in the case of KLM Pan Am Tenerife Accident (1977), the worse aviation disaster in history:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kjLrZ2SDDaU

If the Air Canada pilots didn't start their go around when they did they probably would have taken out 2 other aircraft at a minimum.

Thats one very bad day at work for those 2 pilots.

ravioli (Member Profile)

ravioli (Member Profile)

How Amazon May Monopolize ALL Of Retail - Nerdwriter

notarobot says...

@shagen454, You're on to something about the nature of the future of economics, and also society through the 1% vs. the 99%. You're not wrong that a lot of *money has made it's way to the top, and is staying there.

But it wasn't always this way.

In his film, Inequality For All, Robert Reich points out that during the time of great prosperity in the US (1947-1977) inequality was low, and taxes on the wealthy were much higher than they are today.

A correlation of the effect this was how marketing was thought of. In CBC's "Under The Influence" episode on The World of Business-To-Business Advertising they point out that B2B marketing used to be the boring place that nobody in advertising really wanted to work, but now B2B marketing is surging.

The CBC radio show doesn't get into asking why that changed, but through the lens of modern economics it isn't hard to see. B2B marketing used to be boring because with low inequality, consumers--*working people*--had all the money. Now, with high inequality, consumers are broke, and all that money is just flowing among corporations, never really trickling more than a few breadcrumbs upon the serfs.

This has deep impacts on society and politics, especially in a land where "money is speech" and all the money is just passed between a few companies and their owners. This means that in the US, there are as few as 144,000 people who have enough "speech" (meaning money) that their voice actually matters, as is pointed out by Lawrence Lessig.


Videos:

--Robert Reich --



--Lawrence Lessig--


Robot solves Rubik's Cube in One Second*

Truck attempting to go across a very thin wooden bridge

Truck attempting to go across a very thin wooden bridge

The Force Awakens - spoiler free review (Spacy Talk Post)

dotdude says...

' Saw it late Thursday night with a small group in a small theater opting out of IMAX 3D. ' Had to ask the staff if they had forgotten Theater 8. It was already five minutes after start time with no previews nor film on screen.

One individual had to inform the rest of us that this was already his second viewing of the film. He told us how much he liked it . . . .


In 1977 I saw the first film with my dad and my brother on a huge screen. I remember the crowd cheering when the two ships first came on screen.

Lucille Ball and Vivian Vance Reunited in 1975

Lucille Ball and Vivian Vance Reunited in 1975

Desi Arnaz Interviewed on Entertainment Tonight in 1982



Send this Article to a Friend



Separate multiple emails with a comma (,); limit 5 recipients






Your email has been sent successfully!

Manage this Video in Your Playlists

Beggar's Canyon