Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Already signed up?
Log in now.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Remember your password?
Log in now.
3 Comments
notarobotsays...Seems like there could be more talked about why formula got a bad name. Thanks, Nestle...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nestl%C3%A9_boycott
yellowcsays...Talk about over extending an issue. The vast majority of the boycott stems around developing countries lack of sanitisation options. This has little to do with baby formula itself.
Let's destroy the reputation of a product that helps millions of babies and the stern non-use might actually be harming some babies, so we can put a maybe tiny dent in one of the biggest food companies in the world! Never mind all the other companies that make formula!
Yay! What a great idea!
How about they focus their charitable efforts in to providing cleaner sources of water in those developing countries instead, seems a tad more useful.
Seems like there could be more talked about why formula got a bad name. Thanks, Nestle...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nestl%C3%A9_boycott
MaxWildersays...Part of the problem with unnecessary formula use is that the mother can stop producing milk. The act of breastfeeding lets the mom's body know it should keep making milk for the next mealtime.
If you give a poor person a week's worth of formula, they might just stop lactating. Then they're *stuck* buying formula until the baby can be weaned from the bottle.
I don't know how true it is, but this was part of the accusations surrounding Nestle's aggressive formula marketing.
Discuss...
Enable JavaScript to submit a comment.