I'm tellin' ya, and the cheesy zombie effects are on par with the best of the best-I maintain, that this segment is better than all 3 seasons so far, of The Walking Dead..which sucked donkey balls, IMLTHO.....Like watching a rotting soap opera of imbeciles without a clue.

Any writers of the show, feel free to chime-in on the thread, you wasted all that coke on the 1st season, so very paltry for the money invested, your final product, may your 4rth season fall flat, die zombies!

♝unsolicited review of Walking Dead #2936

Someone needs to hold a real press conference for half the pop. of those that HAVE access to water who have yet to to discover the wonders of soap 'n deodorant...Weekly exfoliation even??
For more information, go to scrubyershit.org

LOTR soap opera with lots of sex.

...I mean that in a good way.

Chingalera you keep getting on your soap box about this issue. Drop it already, you don't need an M-16 to protect yourself.

I want one of those bars of liposuction fat soap from Fight Club.
Hmmmm, snake oil-Someone should market some novelty soap touting human adipose as superior to other rendered fats-The revenue is all n the labeling:))

I love how Jon points out that we are a nation of overreactors while at the same time he too is overreacting (along with the rest of the media). Guns are used in less than 10% of violent crime, yet that's all the media is concerned about. Jon and the media are both overreacting about so called assault rifles as well. Only 3% of crimes are committed with any type of rifle, and "assault rifles" are only a small sub-category of rifles. Why is the media only focusing on less than 10% of violent crimes (those that only involve guns), and why put so much of that focus on the least used type of gun to commit violence? Mass shootings barely make up 0.1% of all murders, yet it gets constant media coverage for weeks after it happens. If we do something to cut down on ALL violence, gun violence will also drop.

Jon also gets a lot of his "facts" wrong. The CDC has an average (1999-2010) gun homicide rate of 12,807 per year and an average accidental gun death of 758 per year, that doesn't add up to 30,000. There is no epidemic of gun violence either. Violence, including gun violence has been on a steady decline every year.

He was almost about to make a good point about gun control with the comparison to drunk driving. Drunk driving deaths were reduced through common sense laws, stricter sentences for drunk driving offenders and educating the public, not by banning alcohol or cars, or imposing ridiculous limits on cars like reducing the size of fuel tanks so drunk drivers would have to stop and refuel more often. When has banning anything ever solved a problem? We tried that with alcohol already, it didn't work. Drugs are illegal, and hows that war on drugs going? I don't use drugs, but I'm all for legalizing and regulating them. It's our generation's prohibition and it needs to end because all it's doing is causing more crime than it's preventing.

The argument that muskets were all that was available when the constitution was written is ridiculous. When the constitution was written they also didn't have radio, TV or the internet, so should we limit free speech and freedom of the press to only newspapers and soap boxes?

I'm willing to have a common sense discussion on how to reduce not just gun violence but all violence, but I'm waiting for the "anti-gun" side to show up with some common sense instead of fear and ignorance.

Guns are already highly regulated, but I'm not opposed to any new regulation as long as it will keep guns from criminals, include harsher punishment for criminal use of guns, and doesn't put any added burden on responsible gun owners. The current legislation being cooked up (what little has been revealed so far) is completely insane.

And by the way (since Jon brought up Mr. Belding), in 1997 at the Pearl, MS high school, it was the school's assistant principle with a gun that stopped the shooter. This was reported only in local papers. Only one national media network covered it, NBC, they mentioned it only twice, and then it was forgotten. Under the law the assistant principal was considered a criminal for having a gun in a gun free zone, yet if he didn't have his gun in his car that day to stop the shooter, the shooter would have been able to carry out his plan to drive to the junior high and kill more students while police were responding to the high school.

Is it so wrong?? To let the herd cull itself ?? Johnny can't use his hammer correctly so he beat himself in the face and needs stiches. Ban Hammers.
Billy slipped on dish soap in his kitchen wearing defective non-slip soles, ban those, we're too fucking stupid to walk around in our own ki9tchen.
Little Timmy threw a rock and it entered the man's brain through his temple. BAN ROCKS.

This argument is as sound as any that have spewed from all on this subject with a fear of the unknown and a severe lack of basic motor skills and critical thinking-

It is wrong to rely on what is reported and what is not reported by news media, local blotters, etc. to shape one's understanding of the constitution and the history of the United States. YOU PEOPLE WATCH TOO MUCH FUCKING TELEVISION (in whatever country you're in) AND KNWO DICK ABOUT RECENT HISTORY, MUCH LESS ANCIENT.!! The fact that this shit is even up for vote, retooling, or added restrictions boggles, man. Short of a constitutional amendment, the shit reads clearly and plainly in the 2nd and 4rth-If you amend the 2nd you have fucked the thing up, which will consequently, screw the 4rth.

More laws for idiots and imbeciles, less for the operations managers of a realistic unfolding of our immediate future.

A fastidious child with an hour of training and two of practice could kill 100 people with a .22 pistol before the police come or someone wrestles her to the ground, be it school, mall, fast-food joint or post-office line.

Fuck, give morons a goddamn tattoo so we know who to keep sharpened toothbrushes away from

Cenk, misinterpreting the report (yet again), stating that the 11 year old pulled out the gun as a result of a conflict, yet nothing in Anna's report suggests that this is at all what happened.

Sounded more like the 11 year old pulled out the gun to "show off," and then it created a conflict.

This "news" reporter needs to spend a bit more time learning how to listen and evaluate the facts and less time on his soap box, turning news items into vendettas for a personal axe to grind...

It's my belief (& please give the benefit of the doubt to somebody who lives in Britain here) that Pratt made one genuine point that "Moron" side-stepped very nicely, namely the fact that violent crime is much higher here than it is in America. (Example):- You don't see Americans getting drunk & then beating seven barrels of shite out of each other over a lousy football game, happens here all the time.

P.S........ Before anybody asks, yes I HAVE been to America a number of times.

*Climbs off soap-box.

So basically, a light rain shower with some soap. I hope the new one the wife made me buy has more pressure. heat, or magic than this.. just looks like a rinsing off.

How about you don't put words in my mouth? I never said "They get what they ask for". I said "If you don't like it, STOP DOING IT". Same with BR, only with a little less tact.

Seriously, did you read my post? It's effectively 4 or 5 paragraphs saying A) We don't know what goes on prior to filming, and B) If you don't like what you're doing, find the strength to walk away.

I won't go into a full breakdown of my original post, because I feel that if anybody actually took the time to read it, they'd see that i'm definitely not advocating rape (I'd like to point out a quote from my original post: "Maybe we will get rape sites, and if that happens then I fear for the sake of civilized society" you know, saying that I'm hoping that never becomes a reality because of the shear horror that would bring.)

In short, get off whatever soap box you think you're on, because your comment was effectively "Fuck BR->fuck the chick in this vid her views are unrealistic and silly->Fuck BR and Sheppard."

Particularly scary was the fact that the mattress played a soap opera audio snippet as it narrowly missed the driver.

Hey Discovery channel, stop bringing us the soap opera that is "American Chopper" and let us watch any of the builders portrayed in this video every week. Nothing the Tuttles have done even comes close to these amazing bikes.

*beg your pardon, can you spare a moment and listen to what my soap box has to say ?

>> ^dystopianfuturetoday:

I find Hi-Def to be jarring when watching old beloved films. It loses that dreamy painted quality and looks more like closed circuit television. Filmmakers put a lot of effort into creating a beautiful celluloid pallor, which HD Blu-Ray usually just rudely brushes aside. I have a sneaking suspicion that QT feels the same way, because he is a student of classic cinema. I'll be curious to see if QT finds a way to keep the old school warmth. Either way, this looks awesome. Take my money, please.


Are you sure you don't have some kind of motion smoothing on, or some similar effect? Because it sure sounds like it. A good Blu-ray transfer of a classic film looks far, far more film-like than any DVD is able to muster. Modern TVs default to the closed circuit television, or soap opera look, which absolutely baffles me.

I read an article that said that a good rule of thumb is that any video setting that can be turned off on a TV should be turned off. Modern TVs look like garbage by default. Though I suspect that you know how to calibrate your TV, and in that case I honestly have no idea what you're talking about. Blu-rays are awesome.