Translated lyrics

Sexy boy
Sexy boy
Sexy boy
Sexy boy
Where are your heroes
Athlete's body?
Where are your idols
Unshaven, well dressed?
Sexy boy
Sexy boy
In their eyes dollars
In their smiles diamonds
Me too, one day
I'll be handsome as a God
Sexy boy
Sexy boy
Apollo 2000
Zero defects, twenty-one years
It's the ideal man
Charm masculine
Sexy boy
Sexy boy
Sexy boy
Sexy boy
Sexy boy
Sexy boy
Sexy boy
Sexy boy

I find it difficult to believe people are willing to give this argument 45 minutes....I did not watch it, so I won't vote.

My opinion, if you knowingly surprise your partner during sex with what genitals you possess after doing everything possible to hide the fact that they don't match your outward appearance, you are trying to trick them and you are a trap....and I hope that label is distressing and insulting to you because you are a deceiver and a liar.

Be who you want to be, but be honest about it.
If you're a chick with a dick, wear a codpiece when you go out picking up dudes, not tape. You wouldn't be happy if that sexy buff dude you took home turns out to be a butch lesbian with a rolled up sock in their pants and a taped chest and you certainly wouldn't just go ahead and have sex with them even though you like dudes and penises....why would someone ever think that's ok?

Edit: and I think the answer to the question is obvious, if your sex organs are homogeneous with the sex organs of the partners you prefer, you are homosexual.

Boston Dynamics was bought last year by the Japanese. Shortly thereafter sexy dances were given a much higher priority.

this really needs a sexy sax man music

Yeah, I've got to agree, that cannot be a coincidence. It is creepy on the same level as a hooters or any other business that hires exclusively hot women to do a job that should have nothing to do with looks.

It's not so much that I worry about the average female gun enthusiast going without work, but that it's hard to imagine that sort of workplace culture isn't rife with sexual harassment. Any time a woman looking sexy is a job requirement, it's a fair bet that her boss wants more than to look at her.

I still think the Koeniggseggsggegsneggsgg looks like a soulless blob of playdough. Pay that much? You should get at least a slap dash attempt at sexy.

Tags for this video have been changed from '90s, bauhaus, zebra shirt, hair, sexy, Love and Rockets' to '80s, bauhaus, zebra shirt, hair, sexy, Love and Rockets' - edited by lurgee

Tags for this video have been changed from '90s, bauhaus, zebra shirt, hair, sexy' to '90s, bauhaus, zebra shirt, hair, sexy, Love and Rockets' - edited by lurgee

That goddamn thing. I am sick of hearing about it.

Also, that other thing? I liked before the rest of you bastards ruined it. Now, I no longer like that other thing. Instead, I like THIS thing, which none of you are smart/funny/sexy/strong enough to understand/appreciate/wear/do.

You all suck.

Excellent. But, I have a reaction to your (Green's?) text in the description.

1. Nostalgia is a motivator. But I think it tends to be a *strong* motivator only of individuals, not of collective societies. If Trump has nostalgia for fossil fuels (personally I think his motivations lie elsewhere), the good news is that that nostalgia won't be very contagious to American citizens. At least not for long.

People like Elon Musk / Tesla are making it clear that electric and renewables are the sexy high-tech future. That appeal to our vanity will be much more effective as a "carrot" motivation, as compared to a "stick" with carbon taxes etc.


2. This essentially boils down to an industrial version of Isolationism. Trump represents a bigger push in that direction by far compared to being motivated by nostalgia. BUT, I think that trying to explain that resistance in him and others purely through that anti-globalization lens misses some things.

Just as nostalgia is a better motivator for individuals than societies, altruism (if you believe it can exist) functions the same way. And that's 90% of what the Paris Accords are: altruism.

On paper, it makes sense for us as individuals in the US to acknowledge that we got a disproportionate level of advancement out of fossil fuel usage through our history. As individuals, we can see the undeniable truth in that. But ask us to act -- collectively -- on that and watch as our collective altruistic tendencies are drastically reduced compared to the sum of our individual altruistic tendencies.

That's not really evil, that's just human nature. But it is precisely the reason that I feel that encouraging people like Elon Musk is by far the superior way to lead us into the future. Tesla makes cars that are better than competing ICE vehicles for many/most use-cases. And not "better" in the sense that our individual sense of altruism gets triggered to reward our brain's pleasure center because we've prevented some Pacific islander's house from getting wiped out in a sea level rise by buying one. No, better in real, measurable criteria: less expensive to operate, better performance / top speed / acceleration, features ... potentially even panty-dropping sexiness. That shit can motivate us as a collective society much more reliably than altruism.

And that's why I think it is more important to encourage the Elon Musks of the future than it is to get TOO overly concerned about the Donald Trumps of the present. Although admittedly, there's certainly ways to try to do both.

Thank you bud. It sure is one sexy machine. I prefer the poor mans Porsche, the 914.