search results matching tag: privilege
» channel: weather
go advanced with your query
Search took 0.004 seconds
| Videos (126) | Sift Talk (50) | Blogs (20) | Comments (1000) |
go advanced with your query
Search took 0.004 seconds
| Videos (126) | Sift Talk (50) | Blogs (20) | Comments (1000) |
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Already signed up?
Log in now.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Remember your password?
Log in now.
Car attempts to hit motorcycle - bonus ending
siftbotInvocations (dead) cannot be called by My_design because My_design is not privileged - sorry.
Car attempts to hit motorcycle - bonus ending
siftbotInvocations (dead) cannot be called by transmorpher because transmorpher is not privileged - sorry.
Ferry Vs. Container Crane
siftbotInvocations (dead) cannot be called by StukaFox because StukaFox is not privileged - sorry.
On The Nature Of Daylight
siftbotInvocations (canada) cannot be called by eoe because eoe is not privileged - sorry.
What did you think was going to happen?
siftbotInvocations (dead) cannot be called by phyman because phyman is not privileged - sorry.
When you're overqualified for the job
siftbotInvocations (isdupe) cannot be called by Ashenkase because Ashenkase is not privileged - sorry.
Samantha Bee, Full Frontal - Voter Suppression
BSRI don't travel TO work. I'm AT work 24 hrs. a day, 6 days week. I'm getting paid right now to reply to you. Someone would literally have to die to pull me away from replying to you right now. (not a compliment, just fact)
Then I will travel to the scene, pick up the deceased and take it just shy of its "final destination."
If I should happen to get pulled over for going 10 mph over the speed limit, the officer would gladly let me go or give me a police escort depending on the situation.
It is my job and a privilege to do my job which includes driving. As I stated earlier, it is also my right to travel as a licensed driver.
I also have verifiable proof of my pristine driving record.
Post my bail. I'm not falling that old trick again.
Go travel to work and get pulled over with out an ID and see what happens. Claim you Constitutional rights then call me and I'll post your bail
Samantha Bee, Full Frontal - Voter Suppression
BSRYou need a license to drive because it's a privilege . You have the right to travel.
Rights?
You need a license to Drive and it is a "right" Well the right to travel.
Jay finds a baby whale....
siftbotInvocations (dupeof=https://videosift.com/video/Extreme-Boston-Sun-Fish-Baby-Whale) cannot be called by mxxcon because mxxcon is not privileged - sorry.
Building A Leonardo da Vinci Bridge
bcglorf says...White privilege
Cool, but why is it a da Vinci bridge? China built this way for at least hundreds or possibly even thousands of years before Leonardo.
A Wild Canadian Lynx And A Cameraman
siftbotInvocations (quality) cannot be called by StukaFox because StukaFox is not privileged - sorry.
McKenna Denson Testimony in Joseph Bishop Mormon Church
RFlaggRICO will never be used against churches. Kavanaugh's appointment means more and more power handed to churches so long as they are Christian. We are heading to a theocracy, and it'll get worse. Kavanaugh doesn't believe in the separation of church and state, at least keeping the church out of the state and believes in the privilege of the church. Gay rights will go out the door. Give them time to replace one more justice on the court, and it may even become a crime. Kavanaugh believes that neutrality between faith and non-faith matters is in fact hostility against the faith.
The Mueller Investigation Is Not A Witch Hunt
newtboyAgain, you are 100% wrong.
You really need to stop taking legal advice from lying criminal know nothing's trying to weasel out of being caught breaking laws. Of course Trump tells you it isn't a crime. Try looking at the law.
Trump's assertion that using your own money for campaign related expenses without reporting it is legal is 100% wrong. That's an illegal contribution.
Having your lawyer do it for you and then lie to hide it, that compounds the crime, it doesn't erase it. This is why Cohen's recordings are evidence and not privileged. There's no attorney client privilege if you and the lawyer were conspiring to commit crimes, which they clearly and admittedly were.
Cohen admitted to intentionally violating portions of the following federal election laws on behalf of Donald Trump:
52 U.S. Code § 30116 – Limitations on contributions and expenditures
52 U.S. Code § 30118 – Contributions or expenditures by national banks, corporations, or labor organizations
Just duh, Bob. You need to stop talking about stuff you learned from Trump, it's 100% bullshit lies and makes you look incredibly stupid and naive when you repeat their dumb, easily debunked lies.
When he's impeached, I only wish part of the law said idiots who support him forfeit their vote next election and must pass a civics test to have them reinstated. Most of you would never vote again. You have absolutely abdicated your right to complain about the next democratic president. Anything and everything they do that you find criminal or unseemly will be excused/dismissed with one word....Trump. Be ready for a HUGE jump to the left in 2 years, the next president has carte blanche to do whatever they please, thanks to your ilk excusing and turning a blind eye to Trump's crimes.
It makes me wonder how you'll excuse his repeating violations of the constitution like the emoluments clause that he's violated daily since the day he took office. Clearly the constitution means less than Trump to your kind.
Only illegal if it cam from the campaign finance money pot.
Using you own money is fine.
Using you lawyers money is even better.
That is gonna leave a mark
siftbotInvocations (dead) cannot be called by StukaFox because StukaFox is not privileged - sorry.
newtboy
(Member Profile)
bcglorf says...it behooves us to give a leg up to those trying hard to do it for themselves....no?
I vehemently agree on this. I merely argue that giving the leg up shouldn't be based upon race but upon lack of opportunity. The two fellow black students you mentioned, who were nearly as advantaged as you would have similarly destroyed other black students from crappy inner city schools, but a race based system would give no quarter to the inner city kids in that insistence, still favouring privileged kids over the unprivileged, just so happens these privileged kids would be black.
I agree fully with helping out the disadvantaged. If a race is grossly over represented among the poor, then policies to help the poor will also grossly provide more assistance to that race. I don't consider that discriminatory though, it's just a historical consequence.
In the Canadian model, direct assistance or compensation for past harm is also something I can get behind. Of course, proving and carefully adjudicating what that should mean is a tough nut, but our courts are expressly for that kind of dispute.
I don't disagree, and we have much the same thing in practice if not by law with our native people's, they even have their own separate tribal police, courts, and laws. They are in many ways a different country inside our borders.
I agree, removing the disparities in lower education is far more desirable....but at least here we're doing the opposite, defunding public schools and programs that offer assistance like breakfast and lunch while also making it easier for affluent people to use public funds to pay for private schools, effectively defunding the public schools even farther.
That leaves us trying things like affirmative action in admissions to try to mitigate the continuing unfair, unequal opportunities lower income students face. Far from ideal, but better than another poke in the eye with a sharp stick, as my wife used to say....and she ought to know! ;-)
They might put the argument in different terms. Which do you prefer....giving admission advantages to aboriginal students in recognition of the piss poor opportunities they've had educationally, or give sentencing advantages to aboriginal criminals in recognition of the across the board piss poor opportunities they've had, recognizing that neither approach addresses the underlying problems, only the results of those long standing issues that simply are not being addressed at all.
What doesn't work is ignoring their lack of opportunities and expecting them to perform on par with other, non disadvantaged kids. That just gets you uneducated, pissed off adults with a chip on their shoulder and no prospects for improvement.
So.....until we actually get to work improving their overall situation, easier said than done, it behooves us to give a leg up to those trying hard to do it for themselves....no? Otherwise we're likely just perpetuating a cycle of criminality that hurts us all.