Its Sweden's new nudist division, a reworking of the American shock and awe strategy.

Also, after some quick Googling, I think this is from "Nudist Colony of the Dead"

Fletch, nudity does not = pornography (which is what is banned here, no one ever said no to boobies). Just because a person is naked does not mean they are doing anything remotely erotic or sexual (pornographic). Eroticism is all in the actions, scenario, atmosphere and other psychological factors employed... just being naked does not a porno make. These models are a pretty good example because they are not only naked, but displaying, uh... art(?) in an area considered to be erogenous; yet still, they are not doing anything at all sexual, rather they are acting like typical underfed, prissy, pissed off, walking clothes racks... I'm pretty sure very few people viewing this felt at all aroused, probably most of them were like me and were just fighting to keep lunch down.

And for anyone who still thinks that a lack of clothing instantly equals porn or is bound to trigger some kind of sinful, impure thoughts, I highly recommend you take a life drawing class (even if you suck at drawing or have never done it before), not only will you come to appreciate the fact that about 90% of people probably look better with their clothes on, but you will be treated to one of the most un-erotic experiences of your life... and even the most juvenile of you boys will probably realize that, surprise! It is entirely possible to be in a room with a neked woman and not get a big rubbery one...

If you can't get yourself enrolled in a drawing class, then take a trip to a nude beach, because THAT will probably be just as instructive... although the nudists might insist you take off your trunks too, in which case, well, don't say I didn't warn you

Fascinating sift.

The "truth" is 2.5 years. I am not going to cross dag's wife. Will take my pink diamond away.

I am glad that the discussion is getting away from the ad hominems of "she's mental" and "those kids are screwed" and I think that persephone has a very, very valid point when he/she/they point out that there is a whole baby industry built on telling families that only certain ways to raise children are correct and that if you don't purchase certain products or la leche it for 20 years . . .well . . .your child will certainly die.

This mother's behavior and her willingness to televise it is certainly socially aberrant. It reminds me of nudists in a way. I don't want to go so far as to say that they are stupid, mental, or damaging the kids, but at the same time, I don't want to see a guy without pants when I go to get a bagel in the morning.

I agree with ladybug that the health benefits at this late age are nonexistent and that this whole story reflects more on the mother's need for connection/attention than the needs of her children.

And the "mango" girl is so cool.