search results matching tag: marty
» channel: weather
go advanced with your query
Search took 0.000 seconds
Videos (133) | Sift Talk (3) | Blogs (9) | Comments (120) |
Videos (133) | Sift Talk (3) | Blogs (9) | Comments (120) |
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Already signed up?
Log in now.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Remember your password?
Log in now.
The Nike Air Mags are coming
Tags for this video have been changed from 'marty, mcfly, back to the future, 2015, future, nike, shoes' to 'marty mcfly, back to the future, 2015, future, nike, shoes, air mags' - edited by xxovercastxx
Two Kids React Announcements
I think the one in the hat is Marty Feldman Jr.
Family Guy - Back to the Future -- "It's your kids, Marty."
>> ^critical_d:
dead
Fixed with a cammed copy and thanks.
On the Broken Time Travel Logic of Back to the Future Part 2 (Blog Entry by lucky760)
Never mind Part 2 paradoxezez, Future Boy!
Howzabout Part One's odd goofs? Marty returns to the "improved" 1985 but neither of his parents recognize their offspring looks EXACTLY like that guitar-shredding "Calvin Klein".
On the Broken Time Travel Logic of Back to the Future Part 2 (Blog Entry by lucky760)
>> ^JiggaJonson:
@Sarzy YOU'RE NOT THINKING FOURTH DIMENSIONALLY!!!
Biff can't gradually return to a different future. Just like Doc says when they leave Jenifer behind "The change will be instantaneous!" I'm with Lucky on this one, if the past was modified, Biff should not have been returned to the original timeline, he would have gone to the future where Biff was a millionaire and built a casino in that shitty town.
And I for one think the second movie would have ended well with Doc and Marty sucked into a wormhole of nothingness, leaving no room for the pile of dead cheeseburger meat that was the third film.
Actually, there's a deleted scene on the DVD in which Old Biff, after breaking his cane and stumbling away from the Delorean, gradually disappears. You're supposed to infer that the alternate Biff didn't live to be that old, which made Old Biff disappear -- though that's pretty confusing (which is why they cut the scene).
That supports the fact that certain changes occur gradually, otherwise Old Biff would have disappeared the second he handed Young Biff the almanac.
On the Broken Time Travel Logic of Back to the Future Part 2 (Blog Entry by lucky760)
@Sarzy YOU'RE NOT THINKING FOURTH DIMENSIONALLY!!!
Biff can't gradually return to a different future. Just like Doc says when they leave Jenifer behind "The change will be instantaneous!" I'm with Lucky on this one, if the past was modified, Biff should not have been returned to the original timeline, he would have gone to the future where Biff was a millionaire and built a casino in that shitty town.
And I for one think the second movie would have ended well with Doc and Marty sucked into a wormhole of nothingness, leaving no room for the pile of dead cheeseburger meat that was the third film.
On the Broken Time Travel Logic of Back to the Future Part 2 (Blog Entry by lucky760)
"Doc replies that if they returned to 2015, they'd be going forward in the skewed timeline where Biff is a billionaire and has destroyed the world, so it wouldn't work. Hmm. Once Old Biff gave Young Biff the almanac, that changed the future and the timeline that Old Biff was existing on, right? That being the case, why is it that when he returned to 2015 he landed back exactly where he left from?"
Well -- and this might be a bit of a stretch -- maybe it's because when Old Biff travels from 1955 to 2015, Young Biff hadn't actually used the almanac yet. Thus the alteration of the timeline hadn't quite been set into motion yet, as it was still possible at that point that something could happen to prevent Young Biff from using the almanac and changing the future. But by 1985, that version of the future was already well underway, and thus Marty and Doc would only be able to travel to the new future, and not the old one. Plus, as we've seen previously in the series (with the fading photograph), alterations to the timeline occur gradually, and are not instantaneous.
On the Broken Time Travel Logic of Back to the Future Part 2 (Blog Entry by lucky760)
@lucky760: "Nice theory, but it's proven wrong in BTTF 1 where Marty didn't return..."
I'm saying at no point in any BTTF has anyone ever returned to their original future after traveling to the past. They return to an altered future.
I think Doc has a line about 'the future hasn't been written yet', as the norm is to alter the future all the time, but going into the past means altering the future again... and I'm arguing you can't ever return to that first time line in a BTTF universe. ... errr, multi-verse
On the Broken Time Travel Logic of Back to the Future Part 2 (Blog Entry by lucky760)
@bamdrew: "If this logic were strictly adhered to I don't see how you could ever return to your original future once you've gone to the past" -- Nice theory, but it's proven wrong in BTTF 1 where Marty didn't return to his original future. He landed in the altered future (where his brother's a lawyer, his father's an author, he has a truck, etc.).
@campionidelmondo: Those are some great thoughts that will help me sleep at night. I like the idea of #2, as it reminds me of Bill and Ted: "Later, I'll travel back to before we got locked in this cage and give myself the key... Now I have the key!"
Glad I'm not the only one who overlooked this gaping hole for so many, many years. That's how you know these movies are really great- they're capable of distracting you by entertaining you so thoroughly.
Side note: I learned in the new special features that the original ending was written so that Marty drove the Delorean into a nuclear bomb test detonation in the desert rather than hitting the lightning cable at precisely 88 mph. (And what are the odds he could hit the cable at the split second the lightning bolt was hitting it? Another quirk that's started bothering me.)
On the Broken Time Travel Logic of Back to the Future Part 2 (Blog Entry by lucky760)
Yep, definitely a plothole. I only noticed it a a while ago when seeing the movie for perhaps the 20th time...definitely felt like I should've noticed it before...and suddenly you can't not notice it.
If it bugs you too much and since it's time travel, you can always imagine some rules that will make it fit. Examples:
1) Doc and Marty are time travelers and thus isolated from time changes that happen around them. The future that old Biff returns to is actually different, but since they're just standing outside in the street they don't notice it.
2) The future old Biff returns to is the same, because all the events including Marty's retrieval of the Almanac already took place. However, since time is still a straight (but distorted) line to Doc and Marty, they first have to go "back" to the altered present, then go to the past and so on.
3) There are no time lines, it's all parallel universes.
JESUS CHRIST! Who said Christian music has to be bad?
Wow, this is loaded - Pokemon Parody - but aren't Pokemon supposed to be Demons?
Pokemon actually means Pocket Monsters but that's not what them Christians think...
The Best Pokemon Site Ever:
My little grandson is only 3 and a half, but is already obsessed with Pokemon, and his Mum, my daughter Deborah, {who is not saved as yet,} buys him whatever he asks for. The last time they visited us, he had his pokemon cards, coins, and figures with him, and he was DREADFUL!! He was rude, cheeky, wouldn't eat any lunch, tried to run away several times, bit his big sister hard on the arm and made her cry. He also likes Power Rangers!"
- http://www.cephasministry.com/save_our_children_pokemon_booklet.html
Another good one!
"Earlier this week at Landover's Wednesday evening service, children's pastor Marty Richards told 714 kids ages 2 through 10 that Pokemon is evil and was sent to this planet under direct orders from Satan himself. "
- http://www.landoverbaptist.org/news1099/pokemon.html
(landoverbaptist is a parody site)
Congresswoman Shot In The Head Point Blank 6 Others Killed
Sarah Palin and the Tea Party have used excessively violent rhetoric and symbolism at their rallies. The detail receiving the most attention is Sarah Palin's map graphic of Democratic 'targets' with sniper rifle crosshairs trained on each targeted opponent - Gifford being one of the targets. There have been warnings over the last couple of years that the influence of this kind of violent rhetoric on impressionable and unstable minds could lead to tragedy.
Here is the graphic: http://i.imgur.com/gs0t7.jpg
Here is an article with more details on this subject: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/marty-kaplan/gabrielle-giffords-shooting_b_806232.html>>
^blankfist:
Why is everyone blaming Palin? What did she do?
Just curious. I didn't hear anything about Palin in the report, but some of the comments here seemed to allude to her involvement.
Cowboys and Aliens -- trailer
First thing I heard in my mind was Marty Robbins' "Big Iron". Damn Mojave Music Radio.>> ^00Scud00:
Also I know I've been playing too much Fallout 3: New Vegas because the first thing I thought when I saw the bracelet was "Hey it's a Pipboy."
Marty McFly voice actor for new Back to the Future The Game.
>> ^ant:
Wait, why is MJ Fox not voice acting?
1) Even on "good days" he doesn't sound like a teenager anymore.
2) I don't think there are many "good days" anymore.
Marty McFly voice actor for new Back to the Future The Game.
>> ^Grimm:
BTW - Just came across this.
Telltale Games has Back to the Future Episode One (PC) for Free. Coupon should automatically be applied when clicking the link and added to cart, if not apply coupon code "121GIGAWATTS".
http://www.telltalegames.com/bttfoffer
Thanks! That worked great! Free game!